-
Posts
18,162 -
Joined
Everything posted by Smirking_Saint
-
Andy Carroll pulls out of squad.. Lambert in?
Smirking_Saint replied to bowers-sfc's topic in The Saints
It was a decent sentiment, but unfortunately flawed, Rickie isnt good enough. Much like the norwich fans clamoured for Holt last year... -
Cheers blud, Id be getting it hire purchase anyways, makes it easier for me as I do a hell of a lot of miles, changed two windscreens in my Qashqai already in a single year etc. Either that or CL 220 CDI AMG. Whats pros cons for the BMW though turks ? For our gammy legged friend
-
Looking at the 320D when I change jobs soon. I am also looking at a couple of others. Plenty of Pros from my end, the cons being that they are expensive to insure and maintain but Ill be getting it hire/purchase so I dont need to worry about that
-
Andy Carroll pulls out of squad.. Lambert in?
Smirking_Saint replied to bowers-sfc's topic in The Saints
I tried to explain this fact a while ago, it was largely ignored.. You also cant flood a team with players not used to playing together, as basically, they will find it harder to play together, hence why you pick the bulk from teams that have the most english players of int ability -
Andy Carroll pulls out of squad.. Lambert in?
Smirking_Saint replied to bowers-sfc's topic in The Saints
No johnson ? No welbeck ? Britton ? Parker ? Lambert ? Still, its too early to name a squad, another whole season of football, Lambert wont be first choice next year. -
You could probably build a half decent chsmpionship team out of that lot
-
Who are you picking as first on the tream sheet.?
Smirking_Saint replied to david in sweden's topic in The Saints
Boruc, Clyne, Yoshi, shaw, schneiderlin, ramirez, maybe cork New players in all other positions, a mobile forward to make us competetive, two tricky pacey wingers, a dominant CB and a CM to be of same quality or better than cork and morgan. -
You realise that the buildings were not just 'supporting the same weight' any more and were seriously weakened by thr plane impacts and then fires ? Kerosine burns incredibly hot btw. Once the top layers started to collapse then the forces on its supporting structures would be far greater then when the building was sitting there unweakened. A building that had much support through the centre and its centre column had been weakened aswell ? The rest is as you say, pretty much a load of waffle, a paranoid conspiracist clinging in to the hope they can topple the big bad governments ? I have always wondered what they expect to achieve however, if they did manage to get enough people to believe this crap ? Besides, a single fact remains, no conspiracy has ever been proven correct, no shred of conclusive proof has ever been found and the majority of people believe conspiracists to be pie in the sky fanatics. No doubt that that is a conspiracy in itself, but in reality it is because there has never been a reasoned arguement worth talking about.
-
I actually feel quite sorry for those that actually believe this crap
-
Poll - Should Miltonroader07 be reinstated?
Smirking_Saint replied to Glasgow_Saint's topic in The Muppet Show
Well done mods, more fine work your doing......... -
Its not logical to look at a widely accepted set of results, take on board the counter arguements and potential theories and then make my mind up that there is little validity in the small amount of so called evidence that eventually falls down as mere ambiguities then ? As far as the bbc thing is concerned, I wasnt saying that you were necessarily wrong to contact them, just that you didnt envisage a situation within which they thought you were slightly mental ? Or that they hadnt had a brief look at so called evidence before ? Im not saying dont question, I love science, I love my job, it allows me to question and investigate things. But there are certain situations that just arent worth the effort. If there was a shred of credible evidence in any of these big 'conspiracies' they would be exposed and a major government would topple
-
The reason your getting flak papster is because to everyone but yourself you are so far off the mark it isnt true, ok, you have found a single point of discussion which has been effectively counter argued to the point that you were not able to oppose it effectively ? Also emailing the BBC about the 'controlled explosion theory' and not expecting to be shot down shows the level that you have been dragged in on this, I notice you ignored my post earlier btw. The reason that conspiracists are called nutters pap is because to the layman they are, they havn't revealed some massive secret that none of us are intelligent to see, they have just gripped onto a small piece of info and run away with their own imaginations. This essentially makes them and unfortunately you akin to those that follow the bible pap, grabbing a few bits of substantial evidence which can more then easily be proven incorrect but failing to see (or blindly ignoring) the logical path that the majority of us follow.
-
Not quite, Chalet is mostly h-armless and oscar is well..... You get where this is going
-
FWIW conspiracies like the whole asbestos thing are believable and probably true, that certainly wouldnt surprise me at all, governments have a lot more to lose though and, esp in civilized countries like ours I find atrocities against its populace v hard to believe
-
I really dont know, for me, I can see how they possibly can, entering a plea of not guilty with such an overwhelming amount of evidence is crazy, added to that the fact that they did what they did for their cause then no, they will definately plead guilty. From a conspiracy POV though, if there were to be others involved, or lets just say, if it were me I wouldnt leave any chance of anything coming out, people cracking under pressure etc I would have taken them out there and then. From a 9/11 POV its difficult, having worked alongside officials which carry out situation planning every day on every occurance (they seem to have an amazingly interesting job) on a loss of grid scenario I got talking and found out they basically go over and over a range of situations all the time, we didnt talk about 9/11 but it makes you think it was probably coincidence and unfortunate it happened that day. Also no one (from memory) flew a plane into a building before, should the military have shot down a passenger airline they would have been slammed, should they have shot them down at the point of no return over a city then there would have been damage and would have been slammed, nobody knew they were going to slam two planes into the towers, it was a surprise to everyone.
-
Bear, think you need to think about the path your taking yos, here is promo video for ya https://www.youtube.com/embed/Kppx4bzfAaE
-
Looked into possibility of moving to Dubai, Oz or New Zealand I can get work reletively easily out there, its just whether I can be arsed to move, personally I dont think the wife will want to emigrate, even for a year, so short of leaving her behind or drugging her it looks like I have to put up with the UK Obviously this post hasnt helped you at all
-
I sort of disagree with you a little here from the perspective that they allow most extremist nutjobs to bang on and on with their bile etc but it seems they like to pick and choose yes. As for pap, no of course I havn't believed everything that I have ever been told or read but when the evidence categorically points to a certain action there really is no need in my mind to persue it any further, as I said before the fact none of these massive grand conspiracies have ever turned out to be true and in that I am talking aliens, JFK, boston, 9/11 etc the shear amount of people involved you would think there would be a leak somewhere and with all posibility there would be international outcry and perhaps war. I get your its wrong to believe claptrap but that means you must live a sad existance ? Can never accept a promise or believe anything no matter how trivial and its dangerous as it A. Cant be healthy and B. Goes to help create some of the brainwashed nutjobs we see carrying out these atrocities (not saying your there BTW) As per Woolwich, if the government had set these guys up for it, surely they would have killed them when they had the chance ? Wouldn't have been hard would it ? And there wouldnt be many complsining about their deaths. Instead they are standing trial within which anything could be found out ? Unless they control the jury aswell ? Wow this is a very intricate plan isnt it ?
-
You should invents a bearsy app yos, where you can writes what you want but it adds yos n stuffs ? That would be well worth 69p yo Try not to get a permaban though, you'll have to get a new username like donkey or platipussy
-
I dont think he is a troll viking, I think he positively believes what he is typing, which is pretty scary when you think about it.
-
After not valuing me in this post your never gonna touch me again bear
-
Suarez' is better I have heard
-
Buctootim was sent by the government to discredit pap......
-
I did forget about the thread about the boston bombings. Wow simply wow Pap I think unfortunately you have yourself defamed your own character, now I dont condone what Tim has said at all but you have to realise you are posting on a public medium things that people not only disbelieve but are a little disgusted and certainly surprised to be reading. Im not commenting on any psychological issues, as you say, I dont know you etc You do come across as a very intelligent chap, however you seem to be a bit of a fantasist wanting there to be alterior motives. I personally cant understand this, but if you dont want people to judge those fragments you leave on here then think about what you are writing ? No doubt the ban hammer is on its way though, or atleast the lock, which is unfortunate and frankly not needed