alpine_saint

No fluke he is straight back into England contention.

Not 100% convinced, but not sure we could have done better without it costing an arm and a leg.

When players and managers move on to bigger and better things, they seem to forget the ingredients that got them into the position of having a choice in the first place. Rodgers did a good job at Swansea, but lost himself and his principles (worst case: picking the players to buy). It really is all to do with money, sadly. I dont even buy the "big club" crap any more. Chelsea are not historically a big club, and Liverpool are no longer a big club. F**k knows what Spurs were/are.

Weeeelll, he does try to create some sort of formation with them.

Your usual standard of post.

No, it would be much better if the superb individual performances cant be differentiated across the team. But I guess then someone would come sniffing for Koeman. I didnt say I dont want us to have good players with good performances. What a strange interpretation.

Really hope that Klopp has the sense to hold off for a few days....

I hate it when players like him and Mane have such an obvious impact, because it puts them straight in the shop window.

They went out in the 3rd Qual Round (where they entered) to Fenerbahce, so if he did play he didnt get much of a run.

Thought he was a gem when I saw him against Leipzig. But he is short. Will be dropped for some matches, I guess.

Yes, something like this. Otherwise he's gone in January.

An accurate summary.

Tough question. Manyoo last season were a better team than Chelsea this season. But Mourinho is a c**t, they are reigning champions, and we came from behind with 3 goals.

He meant in a PL game.

Comic genius...

Toby who ?

Wow..

What now ?

Thats a good question. Wasnt the ref of the Germany v England game in SA on record as watching Lampards disallowed goal at half time and saying "Oh My God" ?

Mourinho will still be bleating to the press about refs being biased against Chelsea the minute a big decision goes against them........

There was an argument about gun crime vs. violent crime on Facebook yesterday. Violent Crime victims (per 100,000 pop.) UK : 2500 US : 500 Gun deaths (per 100,000 pop.) UK : 0.25 US : 10 It might only be me, but if these figures are correct, looks to me like overall, forgetting the sensational headlines, guns prevent violent crime at statistically low cost.

Woy wants to move him on to Liverpool ASAP.

Like taking candy from a baby........

The irony is, of course, that the particular bellend you are parodying didnt actually put a single penny of his own money into the club.

I'm of half-a-mind to hope he does, every week, just so he gets some playing time so we can kill this f**king debate one way or the other, once-and-for-all.