Lighthouse

Surely that should read 'subbed on'?

He has had an excellent scoring record since leaving Holland, although I fear his form will dip significantly under Koeman.

They aren't swans. Tadic speaks English well enough, we don't need another Serb to hold his hand.

I was in Lincolnshire a few years ago when we had an absolute monster by UK standards. 5.2 I think it was and I was 10 miles from the epicentre.

I know and it was done a thousands times before that. Normally by 15 year olds who want to be proper naughty by saying something rude on TV. The dildo was predictable enough as well. If you're going to all the effort of driving down to the stadium and standing there until midnight at least come up with something original. Form a barber shop quartet or something.

I don't know why SSN bother getting reporters to stand outside the stadium in front of a bunch of kn*b heads. It's not as if Bale and Messi are going to come walking through the main entrance at Selhurst Park. It's never long before some razor sharp pioneer of modern comedy shouts, "f**k her right in the pussy!" Or something equally as original and hilarious. I don't think we will do anything. Personally I would like another striker but I think the only business will be Osvaldo out on loan again.

Not last season, or at least not convincingly they weren't. Anyway, here is the new Lotus The nose is a bit 'Matt Le Tiss' but again it's a big improvement on last year's Janet Street Walrus. They have taken over McLaren's supply on Merc engines.

Anyone else remember GBTTFFS!

The Sunderland game was the first one following that incident.

Which is obviously a bull sh*t saying, Ronaldo was sent off in his last game. Tadic is a decent player suffering from some bad form.

Ah, it's like being back in League 1. 5 goals and our game is done and dusted in less than a minute.

I like your jokes Fry, please don't stop! On a separate issue, why is our game being shown after a 0-0 draw?

Paddy Power just tweeted that an Ayrton on 2-0 Boro and 4-2 Bradford would have paid out around £355,000. I doubt there were any takers on that.

Can we get JRod a ticket in row A of the Northam, just behind the goal. I reckon if he wears his kit and yells at JWP for a pass, he will bang in about 15 goals a season.

He created 5 goals in one game against Sunderland and our first winner at Old Trafford for 27 years and you post that after one sh*t cup game? The 4th top assister in the Premier League and you never want him to play for us again. Wow.

There was a dribble of applause in the Northam and a half hearted attempt at 'he sh*ts when he wants' but that was about it.

This. We just need to go easy on the ketamine at lunch time.

It does indeed, I'm glad we finally agree. I'm sure you will agree also that, using this logic, every team will score the same number of points for the remainder of the season. I'm looking forward to our Champions League campaign with great excitement.

Haven't we sold out for the last 6 home games? We don't need a cup run this year to get people through the gates, decent football every week will do that by itself. I would rate our chances of matching Arsenal, Spuds and United over 16 game much higher than winning 6 consecutive games. A cup is strike one and you're out, it would be like if after the Man City game that was the end of the League campaign. Each game is as good as 50/50. When Chelsea and City are losing in their own back yard to Boro and Bradford, anything can happen. So from that point of view there is a 1 in 64 chance of winning the Cup if you enter at the 3rd round. If you can find me a bookies offering 64/1 on Saints to finish top 4 please let me know because I'm definitely having £50 on that.

There are no trophies for winning the FA Cup 4th round either. The trophy comes from winning 6 consecutive FA Cup games. If you win 6 consecutive Champions League games you win the qualifier and your group.

I will refer again to many Middle Eastern countries where images of porn and nudity are strictly forbidden and yet they have pretty much the worst record for women's rights on the planet. People don't base their morality around a picture on one page of a newspaper. If they started publishing 'ISIS weekly' magazine in WH Smiths would we all turn in to terrorists if we read it for a few weeks? Obviously not because we form our own opinions and don't just agree with everything we see on a piece of paper. If page 3 was indeed promoting the message that women are just sexual objects then all the girls on this thread would be saying, "I'm just a silly girl, would you like me to post a picture of my boobs," whilst all the men would be saying, "phwooooar boobs!!!... tits!!" The fact that we aren't and that most people generally don't approve of it shows that we are more advanced as a species than we give ourselves credit for. Basically, the people who see girls as objects will do so anyway because that is the way they are geared. Page 3 is just one source of material, if you take it away pervy men aren't going to go away, rethink their lives and set up a women's literacy programme in Djibouti.

I went today but I can't say I'm that bothered about the results. I remember saying to my mate with 10 minutes left that it was decision time, either two goals or no goals. Basically I wanted anything but a replay from today's game. At least now we don't have to worry about players getting injured in cup games and affecting our league form. It was a shame to lose Long today, hopefully he is back soon. You can see Pardew has got Palace looking a much better team from the shambles we beat on Boxing Day. On the other hand if your making Chamakh look good you're not doing something right. We looked lacklustre to be honest, like the players weren't really that interested in the game. A few poor misplaced passes and some very dodgy defending first half. Forster didn't really look with it either.

Poor bloke must have post natal depression after taking a 2st sh*te and an arse like a Japanese flag to go with it. Hope it doesn't affect his performance.

It's tough being a dyslexic paedo.

Leaving the eating disorders issue to one side, you may well think page 3 is pointless but it's not your newspaper so it's not your decision. They clearly think there is some merit to printing it so they do. The placements of it is not an issue as far as I'm concerned. It is well known there are topless girls on page 3, you can't have any complaints about images you are making a free choice to look at.