Daft Kerplunk
Members-
Posts
1,429 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Daft Kerplunk
-
How many times have we let the opposition back in? Remember the times when being 2-0 up meant that was 3 points in the bag. Les needs to call in on Lady Luck and buy some players who know how to play to win a game of football. Then maybe let the manager be the dominant figure in the football department and not just a part of a model that is no longer working.
-
If he was a serious target and it doesn’t happen then it is a significant fail from our current board. We either were serious or not. Regardless of the player’s perceived value (by fans) this deal should have been wrapped up as soon as VVD went if we wanted to do it.
-
Absolutely the best atmosphere at SMS ever, even though the inevitable was going to happen that season. Wonder if we fans remember how to be loud again in time for this season’s relegation run in.
-
This match is an exceptionally uncomfortable watch thinking where we could have been had Katarina been willing to properly invest for growth of our football club instead of priming it for selling. And don’t say it could not have happened because Man City have made something happen from relatively little because of genuine ambition by rich owners and stretching within (and beyond when it got them further) the rules to work for them. Now we are among the favourites for relegation. Nice one.
-
This stadium revamp / improved customer experience.
Daft Kerplunk replied to alpine_saint's topic in The Saints
Heard this was only about hospitality revamp to make it ‘Champions League ready’ so nothing for the oiks. -
Ah okay, there seemed to be an indication that more would come soon. Maybe it was a dream though!
-
Where is part two of this blunderful interview? Club legal team desperately trying to stop publication perhaps!
-
Listening to it makes it even worse. Uninspiring load of rubbish when it comes to the most important thing at a football business: the football.
-
Desperate stuff that. Not a confident Ralph piece
-
Because the media team haven’t had time to put a video/photo montage together yet. Can’t just announce a player without all that in place!
-
Walcott will fit a club narrative of ‘one of our academy players making it to the first team’ so that’s a PR/spin win.
-
He’s not a coach (yet), he’s the resident cheerleader and bants leader. Which is probably going to be helpful. But certainly a different decision than a leading football club might take.
-
Bit harsh on the media man there, can only imagine the orders of secrecy come from on high, and the football side will close ranks and not allow any access. We march on to becoming a secretive non family club that was once a selling point.
-
A first team without a heart.
-
The person at fault for VVD is Reed. Ultimately he’s the one in charge of contracts and whether players leave or not and he has not been able to convince players like VVD, and Bertrand etc. that they still have a career here with a team doing good things whilst looking for a truly top team to move to. The ‘strategy’ of Reed et. al. has fundamentally not worked and they need to rethink ASAP or we are going to continue on a downward spiral and not towards the European competition that Chairman Gao has been sold. They can sack the manager but it will not stop the problems that come with having a football board that is set up to be average. Unless of course that is the real aim. Problem is, when you aim for average you can miss and go to the lower level. That is Saints right now
-
Until an arrogant board stop thinking they are headed for the Champions League with the current football leadership then we will continue bumbling along. Rees hasn’t no idea what it take so to get success and neither do the board. And by success, this is to be the best we can be, not about being ready for the Champions League, as that isn’t happening any time soon.
-
Players don’t give a sh!t about playing for Southampton which is the biggest part of the problem. So much for the ‘due diligence’work on player’s character before they are signed. Absolute tosh. Problems run far deeper than the manager/head of the first team department!
-
Sell him. He’s not here in spirit and we aren’t in a strong enough position to have players who don’t care. I’m sure the Liverpool fans would enjoy him going to Man City as well.
-
The game is a results business and Les isn’t on form and hasn’t been for awhile. Academy has got worse under his stewardship too. Time for him to do the honourable thing and leave.
-
This game will go against type for both managers. Us in a 6-5 thriller
-
Amazing what can happen when you move the ball forward into space quickly and keep on tryin JK he. Everton look as close to being a relagated side as you can at this stage of the season so the 4-1 is probably flattering but far more positive play.
-
Because it was bullsh!t and the longer you leave it, the hope is that people forget. Easy when you’re a regular company, not so much when people care passionately about their team and what goes on with the people who are the current people running he clib
-
Heard from someone who has contacts at the club that the new owner is not likely to (as in not going to) invest anything in the football side of the SFC and has purchased us for other business reasons.
-
The only reason I’m personally not in the Pellegrino Out camp is that the problem for me is largely with the way the football part of SFC business is run. He has had to use coaches he didn’t appoint, players he didn’t have a say in buying, an academy that is no longer producing players good enough for the first team, a DoF (sorry, Vice Chairman for Football) who has overseen the purchase of more defenders when we were absolutely crying out for creative and attacking players, and a core of players who since Koeman has left have lost their motivation to play for the club, probably because the ambition that they were sold it on has all it gone. Something is clearly just not right at the club overall and Pellegrino will be just another fall guy for the ineptitude that is the club’s football leadership right now. Maybe he is not the right man for the job as far as our situation needs but the board put him there after all their brilliant due diligence, just as they did with Puel who was unsuitable too. How long can he obvious individual be blamed whilst the people who put him there and have given him average tools to do the job skulk away in the shadows without saying a word?
