Sergei Gotsmanov

They once asked Colonel Tom Parker if it was true he was taking 50% of Elvis's earnings. He replied no, he is taking 50% of mine.

They have young most of the year now.

Thank god fo that

Thank god fo that

You are using extremes to justify your argument. It is quite evident when a child is being abused. The state has no place in people's home. As it happens my wife wears the trousers!

It is quite evident when a child is being abused.

Of course it does but in my opinion identifying when a child is being abused and when they are being disciplined is quite straight forward.

I am sure that in Nazi Germany or North Korea the State had different definitions of what is acceptable. I am responsible for my children and not the State.

That is all well and good but the State has absolutely no role to play in how I bring my children up. You bring your chidren up how you want and I will bring mine up how I think is best.

I thought it was clever, witty, wacky, warm, very British but too long. I am afraid Verbal's taste is more North Korea.

You mean Alan Mcloughlin. In fairness we only gave him 29 games because if he reached thirty we had to pay even more

Was he in goal when MLT scored through his legs at Old Trafford?

For me it is a bit like Scotland playing rugby; you want to support them but they hate us so much that you simply cannot even if some of your mates follow them.

No offence GM but Saint Army has a sort of charitable feel about it - a bit god squad.

Would that be Mitchel - I thought he was a Liverpool fan

A shameful episode. Our justice has failed to deliver justice once again. The Met's reputation remains and the long tradition of perception of corruption and brutality is still intact.

Like the attitude but take advantage of it while you need to.

If you were able to grasp the context of how it was said I was pointing at that your argument was flawed because you were not able to grasp reality.

and I have patiently but not patronisingly explained that if you open your eyes then you will see that it clearly is racist - it is an insult based on race broadcasted publicly. Can you not understand that I do not care what was said more the hypocrisy of those that are constantly pointing the finger at others the whole time. Are you really unable to understand the importance of context in calling somebody a wigger.

It seems sad that you are blind to your hypocrisy. It is always those that are losing the argument that revert to just abuse and smear.

I am not bothered by what he said or even John Terry; I just think that both of them are idiots and I can decide that myself without needing justice system to get involved. What I do find unpleasant is that those that cry racism at the first opportunity seem to be blinkered when the shoe is on the other foot.

Its very easy to change the goal posts to defend Ferdinand. Racism is about race and that is what Ferdinand's insult was playing on. Its about highlighting the boundaries between the two groups and cultivating suspicion and resentment. Now I do not really subscribe to this but I know that if the case was reversed and a white footballer insulted another white footballer by saying that he was black inside then it would be totally different and you in particular would be frothing at the mouth and demanding retribution. Suiddenly it is only racism if somebody gets a good kicking. Double standards.

You are discounting the fact that Ferdinand used Twitter to abuse Cole. This is not a one on one scenario. If you read what I was saying then you would know that I think that it is absurd that the law is taking people to caught for name calling.