I find it a bit odd though. I was waking up in daylight, then I was waking up in the dark, now I'm waking up in daylight again, and in a few weeks I'll be back to waking in the dark.
Well I guess we are about to see. For most people it's not a boycott as such, just despair at what has become of the club. There can be no doubt though, attendances will continue to fall. And all the time that they do, the club will continue to do nothing about it.
I wouldn't be surprised. A large part of me thinks that the only reason we've played him in the last couple of games was to show another club that he is capable of playing. Same as we did with John last week.
I thought BWP was far more deserving of criticism. Fair enough, left wing isn't his natural position, but there's no excuse for his lazy attitude.
Skacel with Mills looked far more productive. I'd give those two a run of games together.
I thought he was one of our better players actually. Mills played quite well when he came on at left wing.
I don't think people say Skacel is a world beater, just that as we are paying him so much money, we may as well be playing him. He is plenty good enough to get in our team.
No chance. James has been our weak link since day one of the season. Not his fault, as he's not a right back, but he gets torn to shreds every game.
I actually feel very sorry for him.
Only if it was written in Dowie's contract that he had to play who he was told, surely? And if it was, then that's not much of a manager's position is it.
Hang on, I thought the general consensus was that the falling attendances were nothing to do with Lowe? People on here reckon there are only a handful that aren't going because of Rupert, so how does it warrant a major story in the Echo?