Chris27687

Been good - VVD, Romeu, Clasie, Bertrand & Redmond in particular. They seem to get frustrated as a team when the press doesn't work - Sturridge hasn't been in the game at all and you can see why Klopp doesn't like him. Great save by Karius rather than a bad miss by Redmond in my book.

On Southampton Transfer Rumours they are saying that we have made a Loan offer - i'm guessing with an option to buy in the summer & Liverpool want a fee up front.

Hopefully they are crap without Mane. Coutinho can't be at his freshest either!

Cuco will probably be playing for Curacao in 10 years - bet he'd love a WC.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/38565246 "Scottish FA chief executive Stewart Regan welcomed the expansion, saying it was a a "positive step"." I suppose they have to try to get involved some how!

Didn't someone do a run through earlier and the summary was - looks like bambi on ice but has good passing and tackling - head like a 50p piece. Good little pairing with him and VVD then! Sakho for Fonte and Berahinio or this Italian bloke is pretty good business this window and I would be happy. I guess Fonte was going from the start hence why he didn't start in Europe.

Just need to do more of this - https://streamable.com/tw7dl Straight out of the Vinnie Jones school of defending.

Is anyone even interested in him? Benfica are not going to pay him the salary he wants and United no longer seem interested. Could be awkward if no one makes an offer!

Yeah this - if you look at teams that a furthest to the right they are the best, based on his model. Doesn't tie in with the popular narrative round here that we are really bad! Ive seen quite a lot of statistical analaysis rating us really highly.

Hopefully it's Semedo - we seem to have scouted him for ages.

https://mobile.twitter.com/11tegen11/status/812412047409479681 Good and lucky vs Good and unlucky!

he gets 120,000 reasons a week - so i doubt he cares that much.

Sign and loan to Nice for the rest of the season might work if they won't sell now.

My point is you aren't going to solve **** by banning immigration of a certain religious group to the UK - in fact it won't help and just be a waste of cash. If however your goal is to reduce serious crimes which are commonly related to mental health issues or disenfranchisement of young adult men - then changing the environment people live in is the major way of doing that. Is that hard to understand?

I'm not in any way - we have lots of problems with other mentally ill people - countless rapes, murders and serious assaults happen each and every day by lots of subjects of society. The point I'm trying to make is you can solve a lot of these problems by improving the conditions in which people live. I appreciate Islamic terror is the most important thing in the world to you - but your more likely to be effected by a whole world of other crimes which are created by the same environment which radicalises people.

Pretty much every single terrorist attack prior to 2000 in the UK was IRA. http://www.globalresearch.ca/non-muslims-carried-out-more-than-90-of-all-terrorist-attacks-in-america/5333619 Look we are all trying to answer the same question - Why do bad things like this happen? The answer isn't going to be simple - and banning large groups of people will not solve the problem. The problem is more a failing of society in the sense that we have rampant mental health issues and large about of dis-enfranchisement across young angry men (for the most part). The reason it's easier to say ban all the immigrants is because solving the actual problem is going to cost billions and billions - and no one wants to spend the money. If you ever bothered reading about Molenbeek where the Paris attackers came from, i can virtually guarantee you haven't, you would find that it's an incredibly poor **** hole, practically law-less. Why is it a **** hole that's practically law-less - because there are no jobs, no investment and no future. What happens in poor ****-holes that are practically law less with no jobs, no investment and no future - they have mentally high crime rates, health care issues, mental health issues, broken families galore etc. It's not hard to understand people do mental **** when they grow up in these environments - solve the environmental problems (Socio-economic) and you solve everything else.

No one has said they can't have some form of education. Read from Fatwah to Jihad - it will explain a lot of the context you clearly don't understand. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents_in_Great_Britain - Since 2010 there have been 4 terror attacks on UK soil, 2 white supremacists and 2 people of some form of association to the Islamic faith.

Guardian as well.

Try reading this book - https://www.amazon.co.uk/Fatwa-Jihad-Rushdie-Affair-Legacy/dp/1843548232 Modern terrorism has much less to do with main stream religion and way more to do with angry disenfranchised young men who can't/don't fit into society.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wylan_Cyprien You are correct - lazy journalism.

This seems to be getting a bit of traction about the place - seems sufficiently random that there might be something in it and worth it's own thread. Short story - used to play under Puel so we think we might have a chance - Atletico also interested. Having a blinding season for Nice at the moment and enjoying life at the top of the table. I guess he would be a potential Davo replacement down the line - adding a bit more attacking flair to our midfield 3 which is currently a bit too defensive in my opinion. http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/wylan-cyprien/profil/spieler/182889 https://www.whoscored.com/Players/123873 Why not.

JWP has the best free kick and the best delivery out of any of our players - by a long way. it's hard to score from free kicks - http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/9804389/cristiano-ronaldo-free-kick-goals-are-rare-show-whoscored-com-stats JRod or Tadic i guess for the pens.

The main benefit i can see is that building a bespoke stadium geared for creating a great atmosphere rather than having an identi-kit stadium makes for better live & TV viewing, it wouldn't need to be massive, but would help generate a bigger overseas following which seems to be the future of growing club revenues and therefore being more competitive.

Equity release for a new ground seems like a sensible idea - would probably allow us to push the coaching stuff in Asia as well as the states.

I would have thought the council would be keen as well - unless they really are emotionally attached to having a concrete works in prime central real estate. It's mental how that entire river front hasn't been converted to anything else - literally anything else.