sadoldgit

I am not too good to apologise but you have constantly abused me today and did so on a different thread a while back so I figure that there is no point in trying to build bridges with someone who calls you a fucking plank, prick and a bellend on the Israel thread.

This place gets weirder all the time. The very people who accuse me of making things up make stuff up about me? At least have the decency to provide evidence eh? Anyway, I need to put the record straight about yesterday. The person who had her window smashed in Bristol was not in the car at the time it happened and there was no rioting going on around her car when she got to it. She was very shaken up because there had been rioting a few days previously and she was concerned that someone had deliberately targeted her car and knew which car was hers. So, no definitive link to the recent riots and a lot of fuss about nothing on here. Still, the good news is that last night wasn’t to nationwide carnage we were fearing.

And you expect me to apologise?

What? I was agreeing for a ban for myself so long as the other protagonist were banned also. I don’t disagree that I am complicit and have said many times that I will give as good as I get.

He was arrested so I expect he will be at some point.

Are the poorer children not to get breakfasts too? That was one of many plans to help under privileged children. Again, they did say that they would act in the cap when they can. Just for the record, did you speak out about it when the Tories cut it?

I agree, as long as all of those concerned are given bans too.

So you are not going to answer my questions then. Ok.

If you think that piling on to someone on an internet form is funny

Yep, I agree. I can imagine the usual suspects got to spend more times with their families then.

You think, when they are lying on their death beds drawing their final breaths, they will think to themselves, I wish I had spent more time slagging off a complete stranger on a football forum?

Why should I apologise when you continue to accuse me of lying?

Saint68, not 86, was the poster on TUI that you had a very long spat with. You remember, surely? Show the evidence where I said that you were banned for multiple logins please. I have no idea why you were banned. I made an assumption that it was for trolling but have asked you to confirm why. I assume that you know the reason. Show me where I said that you were banned for being a “cock” and for stalking. If I said it the evidence must be there eh? I wouldn’t know what it takes to be a good liar. You seem to know a lot about it though.

If you had of believed what I thought I had been accused of you would have been gullible. As it is you think it funny that I relayed here something that I had been told so I don’t think I need to apologise for anything. At least I don’t play the silly games that you do on COT. 😉

I don’t know, I thought it was an attention seeking device. Most people ITK don’t play games. They post what they know without riddles or silly cartoons. The episode in TUI involved the two of them going at it hammer and tongs, slagging each other off. It was all playground stuff, much like he does here.

If you actually read what I said I am not a liar, I just misunderstood what had been suggested. I am glad to hear that you run your farm well.

So I didn’t read this properly and misread it that I had sat next to him. My bad. Where you go wrong is when you say that it “backed up Soggys POV to the letter.” It didn’t back up my POV. It backed up what had been reported on the news item. Even with your limited capacity to differentiate between the truth and a wind up, you should be able to tell the difference and you have chosen to embellish the story to try and prove a point that doesn’t exist.

If you bother to read what I said I thought that you had said that I sat next to Parker-Bowles, which I hadn’t. Where did I say that you got banned for multiple log ins? I assumed that you got banned for trolling. If not that, what was the reason that you did get banned? I seem to recall it was after a long spat with Saint68 about who was the ITK king but appreciate some clarity as you will obviously know the reason better than I.

Good for you.

It wasn’t a lie. I thought you had said that I had sat next to him which I hadn’t. From memory it was the same guy who works in military intelligence, which would make sense as I believe Parker-Bowles served in the military too. It really isn’t, and wasn’t a big deal. You are a very sad, obsessive person. You stalk people who cross you and seem to spend your life trying to pull them down. You did exactly the same with Saint68 on TUI which eventually got you banned. You really need to take a look at your behaviour. It is not normal for a grown man with a family.

He is trying to prove that integration doesn’t work and that migrants, particularly Muslims, are a problem. They are a problem because they don’t subscribe to British values etc etc. Fortunately the vast majority of the people in this country do not agree with him or the far right thugs who do his bidding on the streets. It is clearly a growing problem though and one that he and his like are working constantly on pushing. This isn’t the end, it has just started.

It really doesn’t matter. From memory he was in the news for some kind of indiscretion. It came up in conversation and another person said that they knew him and that he was a bit of a shagger. People know people. People talk about people. You seem to be falling into the trap of being a bit of a twat like the other twats on here.

I have never met or sat next to Andrew Parker Bowles. People make stuff up and you find it funny. You seem a bit gullible. I hope that you run your farm better than you operate on social media.

He is not just an MP. He is the leader of the Reform party. He has also been very vocal about the cause of the ripts as well as very vocal about immigrants and immigration. Do you understand the difference? Do you think that maybe the riots serve his purpose? He has been trying to stoke up race hate for years. Why would he call for the rioters to stop?

Fair enough.