Jump to content

OldNick

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    24,077
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by OldNick

  1. that is probably the best way to look at it
  2. Im a fan and that is all. If I had been part of the decision making at the club over the last 5 or so years i would not expect to be involved as i would be too ashamed of letting thousands of peope down.
  3. I myself would be less than overjoyed. LC I will stomach
  4. I realise you were there but I was worried the old brain had gone into forgetfull mode and gone all befuddled
  5. I have stalkers as well. I may also say I was not part of the disasters that befell the club .
  6. I cant understand how you are happy to have bakc those people who were a major part of where we are now. RL can also go and get stuffed by the way, he also is part of our inglorious recent history, but the crowd you would accept put us in the financial mire as much as him as they didnt react to the conditions at the time they were in charge.It was negligence IMO
  7. I just think he has baggage and so it will something to keep us uniting as a fan-base as there are always suspicions of him
  8. FC when did you last speak to TL or NSS? The few posters who seem to know are not as postive today as they were yesterday even
  9. well it depends how long we have before we need a cva to stop us getting -25. The moment that is levied i respectfully suggest that any money man will run a mile
  10. CS I hate to cut you down there but neither MC or KK were in the teams in those 2 seasons glory
  11. Hypo, we were on a crest of a wave of renewed optimism and a clean sweep. I had naively hoped that all the past perprtrators are to be gone. MLT is the star that burns brightly lets hope he can keep LC under control.LC has the brownie points in the money he put in of course but I hope he learns to keep a very low profile. I mention LM as he is close to LC and may be shipped in for his football contacts.
  12. whilst i join with the excitement I think we should worry about the deal going through first. Im a little perturbed by some of the comments by people who are said to be closer to the deal than most.If Doggface's info is correct then we should be a little concerned. I think we are getting close to the next wages being paid and also at this time of year Loyalty bonusses etc are due to be paid to the playing staff. that would be quite a wedge.
  13. I assume the 3 are LC MLT and LM. The new dawn is the same as the last dawn except one ray of sunshine
  14. OldNick

    Hypocrisy?

    Well it is quite easy, they have come up with an idea and so by actually putting it up for consultation they would be in favour. If the idea was to shoot the unemployed would they say 'oh lets put that up for consultation' No they wouldn't give it a second thought.It is just another thing to take peoples minds away from the main point that was to Tax by stealth people with landlines.
  15. that was when he was playing for Fulham and sent off for caling the ref a c###
  16. I have faith in your integrity and so read what you say with interest.the tone or wording can be important.Afterall you seem to know as much about the takeover if not more than anybody on here.
  17. That is much more reassuring. Thanks. I assume you hear much from the people involved and may hear before the rest of us
  18. Well he came on and announced the good news. Therefore we see him as someone who can allay any rumour.It cant be both ways. We have secrecy and that in itself breeds rumour and fear/worry. That leads to people making stuff up that needs to be quoshed as quickly as possible.The Farmer has that power, his reply so far does not assure me 100%
  19. OldNick

    Hypocrisy?

    I would nt go for consultation Id get it sorted before publishing it.Why not put every decision to consultation if that is the way of government nowadays, lets have a referendum on it, of course that doesnt happen if there is the slightest chance they might get the decision go against them.Or just have a public enquiry behind closed doors much better, so they can have a good old cover up
  20. OldNick

    Hypocrisy?

    'well that beggars belief if it goes ahead.' my wording in my initial post about the money going to media companies. If it goes ahead. Yes more quangos for civil servants to waste more money, we are a nation of consultors. Of course you will be all for that
  21. That may be the case WSS, but if he has and hasn't quelled the rumour? That is what causes concern.
  22. The Farmer is sound, I think you can withdraw from criticism of him NC. i just believe if he was online and it is not something for people to worry about he'd come on and say so. Afterall he has done so in the past. WSS thinks he doesnt need to, that is fine but a post just to say it is not true would have been sufficient
  23. OldNick

    Hypocrisy?

    who the Liberals or you??? And the difference between bombing civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan is?
  24. OldNick

    Hypocrisy?

    So you are saying it is correct to pay commercial broadcasters money to make news bulletins! I dont get handouts to help run my business in these hard times and so why should media companies. They sink or swim
×
×
  • Create New...