Jump to content

OldNick

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    24513
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by OldNick

  1. Stevo, you will come back and eat your words in couple of seasons time. Iam prepared to back him. Of course we might not have a team or even a forum then though
  2. So were my team, but thats enough about the 1970's
  3. Dont worry Fry will make sure there is enough for his fees and commissions. The administrator will probably take a commission from the sales of players as well of course.
  4. Iam very sad that DMG has gone, he will prove all the doubters wrong. i do hope we have been clever enough to put a damn good sell on clause on him. Goning inot administration was always going to be tough, I could see ot and many others warned of it, sadly many could not. I would love to be have been wrong as I'll be a loser as well. Good luck DMG you will be a tyop player even though many of the people on here dont think so.
  5. Now that is deisappointing. Pinnacle are the last real hope if that is the case. The carpet baggers will be readying for a swoop
  6. NSS it depends though, the frigging christmas doesnt ever seem to come and us turkeys been doing our uptmost to vote in vegetarians but all we are getting is hamfisted cooks who seem to be hellbent in spoiling the broth.
  7. Have the Echo retracted any of their peice regarding Fialka? or even issued an apology
  8. No idea. I expect it will depend on who is owns the club.
  9. of course you are correct BUT Mandaric bankrolled leicester to the tune of 10m last season to egt their way out.
  10. whats a coco clock??? Is that a breakfast cereal?
  11. that is true but if they have more ability to spend more you have a chance. Your arguement could be used if Paul Allen was buying or A N Other. Pinnacle seem to me to be really short of funds to really push us on and so we rightly look at other bids that may give us more of a hopeful future. I want us to be purchased and so what will be will be, but it would be nice to have a real advantage.
  12. that may addup, if Pinnacle are using leverage to fund the buy out then the FL may well be saying no. Again speculation but would make sense.
  13. Hypo I wasnt told specifically, but it seems part of the agreement ties yuo close to the FL and you have to follow certain conditions they impose. The words were like Leeds have had to do. I know no more
  14. a very little i have found out is that it is not just the -10, but there is a document attached they need to sign and that basically has a list of things the FL require they do.Like in the Leeds case the FL basically have quite a bit of control for a couple of years and the requirements to be adhered too are something costly. This is a ramble but I only can remeber a little of what was said but I got the impression that the funding for Pinnalce may not be able to cover this.
  15. Lol, have changed it. Im just putting up confirmation from someone who knows, not paper talk and which clubs
  16. Thorpie you know I cant tell you that. Take it how you like, whether Ive made it up or have somebody who knows has told me.
  17. well I suppose if they have that much interest just coming in off wealth there is aq chance some could come our way, if we have to rely on a semi detached in Finchley being let out it might be more difficult As for Frys comment, he was probably just stating from a personal level trying to keep the staffs mrale up aftter telling them they were not to be paid.
  18. Surman going to either Sheff utd or Wolves. said to be holding back for Wolves and PL. DMG to Forest. Whether this is Fry's Pinnacles contingency I dont know to pay wages, but also probably to cover Frys fees if he starts the winding up
  19. I was told that Fry has told the staff that the Swiss said they would be back by this lunchtime if they were interested. He also said if he was the staff he would rather have the Swiss take us over as thye earn interest a year more than they need to buy us etc. Now that is the thing that confuses me as a company would not be doing tht and so it may be an individual rather than a company.
  20. If they complete then at least we will have transfers to talk about
  21. Trouble is he'll go around as if he owns the site
  22. I would nt worry about getting any height on the ball Drgbaj and foxy had no problems kicking in Lol We have gone over why we were robbed.
×
×
  • Create New...