Jump to content

List the players still at SFC with suspect temperament/commitment


alpine_saint
 Share

Recommended Posts

yeh lets slag off all our players, based on assumed knowledge, maybe we can even whip up a witch hunt. What a great thread.

 

What makes saints so great......supporters like you Alpine.

Now youve got what you wanted, a reaction... feel good............

 

He posted three names. Hardly the whole team. And he's probably quite right, bar Lallana.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Over-reaction due to the OP

 

Aye, the happy-clappy censors at it again.

 

I made the OP based on a collection of comments made on here over the last few months as things unravelled at SFC. They are not necessarily my opinion (I dont doubt Saga or believe half of what is written on here about him, for example; the only time I doubted his commitment is when it was his turn to be pessed about by Burley). Of course, players like Rasiak and Euell werent included in the OP because they are now gone.

 

Why is it so taboo to discuss whether all the lack of commitment and give-up culture of the last 2 seasons has been finally whittled out of the club ?

 

Especially considering how easily we have given up 4 leads already this season ?

Edited by alpine_saint
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aye, the happy-clappy censors at it again.

 

I made the OP based on a collection of comments made on here over the last few months as things unravelled at SFC. They are not necessarily my opinion (I dont doubt Saga or believe half of what is written on here about him, for example; the only time I doubted his commitment is when it was his turn to be pessed about by Burley). Of course, players like Rasiak and Euell werent included in the OP because they are now gone.

 

Why is it so taboo to discuss whether all the lack of commitment and give-up culture of the last 2 seasons has been finally whittled out of the club ?

 

Especially considering how easily we have given up 4 leads already this season ?

 

I am in agreement

 

But it seems on ere these days, you have to be positive about anything and everything otherwise you get shot down

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Less negative, more realistic

 

That's a typical response from a negative person. Negative people think they're being realistic, and positive people are being happy clappy. The truth is, negative people aren't being realistic, they're being negative. Because it's the easy way out....to avoid disappointment if high expectations aren't met. Very sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a typical response from a negative person. Negative people think they're being realistic, and positive people are being happy clappy. The truth is, negative people aren't being realistic, they're being negative. Because it's the easy way out....to avoid disappointment if high expectations aren't met. Very sad.

And some people can only think in binary oppositions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aye, the happy-clappy censors at it again.

 

I made the OP based on a collection of comments made on here over the last few months as things unravelled at SFC. They are not necessarily my opinion (I dont doubt Saga or believe half of what is written on here about him, for example; the only time I doubted his commitment is when it was his turn to be pessed about by Burley). Of course, players like Rasiak and Euell werent included in the OP because they are now gone.

 

Why is it so taboo to discuss whether all the lack of commitment and give-up culture of the last 2 seasons has been finally whittled out of the club ?

 

Especially considering how easily we have given up 4 leads already this season ?

 

 

No issue with the discussion - its not about slagging off its about views on existing Saints players attitude.

 

I do have an issue with all this Happy Clapper stuff tho'. Its devisive and gets us where exactly? Why is it that everyone wants to labell others on here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you say suspect temperament/commitment. Do you mean wanting to further their careers?

 

I'd put Lallana/Morgan and I hope any other player in our squad in that list if thats the case.

 

If you seriously believe that young players like Lallana/Morgan/Mills/Surman/McGoldrick/Walcott/Bale should not be looking to further their careers and play at higher levels and improve themselves as players just to please fans then you are seriously retarded.

 

Young players have ambition and i'm pretty sure that doesn't include sitting bottom of the table in league 1. If they get the chance to earn more money at better clubs then I honestly do not see the problem.

 

As Pardew said though, its when those players move knowing they will be sitting on the bench. Thats pretty stupid. But if they get the chance like Walcott to go and improve themselves at a top club, then I don't see the problem. Same goes for Morgan and Lallana. If they get the chance to play for a better club fair play. Untill then, the only way they are going to get a move is by playing well for us.

 

We are a stepping stone club now. Get over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a typical response from a negative person. Negative people think they're being realistic, and positive people are being happy clappy. The truth is, negative people aren't being realistic, they're being negative. Because it's the easy way out....to avoid disappointment if high expectations aren't met. Very sad.

 

I just say it how i see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a typical response from a negative person. Negative people think they're being realistic, and positive people are being happy clappy. The truth is, negative people aren't being realistic, they're being negative. Because it's the easy way out....to avoid disappointment if high expectations aren't met. Very sad.

 

I think whether you are possivite or negative depends on how accurate your prediction is.

 

Last season for example, some people claimed we'd definitely be in the top half, probably at least make the play offs. Others said it was a ridiculously poor squad and we'd get relegated. The former were accused of being happy clappy, the latter we're negative budgies. At the end of the season we were relegated, so the latter proved to be correct rather than negative.

 

Sadly I can't think of a recent example for the other way around as Saints have seldom exceeded expectations in recent years. I guess those happy few who went to the Mad Stad expecting a win would count, whereas the vast majority expecting us to get dicked were just being negative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do wonder why he took so long to agree to join us.

 

The WP issue ?

 

It does seem convenient that he has signed "subject to WP clearance" on the day of/ morning following the transfer window closing.

 

I do wonder whether he was holding out for other clubs from CCC to make an offer to him, and realised yesterday, through his agent, that this wasn't going to happen.

 

I'm still delighted that he has signed and believe he will be 100% committed from here on in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you say suspect temperament/commitment. Do you mean wanting to further their careers?

 

I'd put Lallana/Morgan and I hope any other player in our squad in that list if thats the case.

 

If you seriously believe that young players like Lallana/Morgan/Mills/Surman/McGoldrick/Walcott/Bale should not be looking to further their careers and play at higher levels and improve themselves as players just to please fans then you are seriously retarded.

 

Young players have ambition and i'm pretty sure that doesn't include sitting bottom of the table in league 1. If they get the chance to earn more money at better clubs then I honestly do not see the problem.

 

As Pardew said though, its when those players move knowing they will be sitting on the bench. Thats pretty stupid. But if they get the chance like Walcott to go and improve themselves at a top club, then I don't see the problem. Same goes for Morgan and Lallana. If they get the chance to play for a better club fair play. Untill then, the only way they are going to get a move is by playing well for us.

 

We are a stepping stone club now. Get over it.

 

 

There is a world of difference between playing out of your skin to get the move you feel you are entitled to and sitting back, not appliyng yourself in the games, sulking and damaging squad morale as certain players have been accused of in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not it at all...it's just a fact of life that successful people think positively and don't "allow for pleasant surprises". I suppose you think all happy and successful people are "lucky" then?!

You're doing your binary oppositions again.

I happen to think (as if it is relevant) that all happy and successful people (as you call them) have had very varied and different routes to where they are now, none of which can be simplistically branded. I'm not sure why you brought in luck, by the way, but hey ho. Best stick to the footie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It does seem convenient that he has signed "subject to WP clearance" on the day of/ morning following the transfer window closing.

 

I do wonder whether he was holding out for other clubs from CCC to make an offer to him, and realised yesterday, through his agent, that this wasn't going to happen.

 

I'm still delighted that he has signed and believe he will be 100% committed from here on in.

 

Its not convienet at all. Maybe the Home Office have only just indicated that his WP application would be successful, and with the various Ts & Cs sorted out with the club weeks ago, there was nowt to discuss in-between ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're doing your binary oppositions again.

I happen to think (as if it is relevant) that all happy and successful people (as you call them) have had very varied and different routes to where they are now, none of which can be simplistically branded. I'm not sure why you brought in luck, by the way, but hey ho. Best stick to the footie.

 

Because negative, miserable and unhappy people all think that rich and successful people have been lucky. Because any success a negative person experiences comes through a "pleasant surprise", so if they see success in another person, they think they got lucky and had a whole heap of pleasant surprises. The truth is, if you believe you'll be successful, there's a much greater chance of it happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because negative, miserable and unhappy people all think that rich and successful people have been lucky. Because any success a negative person experiences comes through a "pleasant surprise", so if they see success in another person, they think they got lucky and had a whole heap of pleasant surprises. The truth is, if you believe you'll be successful, there's a much greater chance of it happening.

 

Doesnt quite apply to a football team we have no control over tho eh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...