Glasgow_Saint Posted 26 November, 2012 Share Posted 26 November, 2012 Pardew lost his job because he wouldnt play Guly! Said as much yesterday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glasgow_Saint Posted 26 November, 2012 Share Posted 26 November, 2012 No goals in last 27 for Guly...... Says it all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 26 November, 2012 Share Posted 26 November, 2012 Pardew lost his job because he wouldnt play Guly! Said as much yesterday When did he say this exactly ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dig Dig Posted 26 November, 2012 Share Posted 26 November, 2012 When did he say this exactly ? He didn't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glasgow_Saint Posted 26 November, 2012 Share Posted 26 November, 2012 When did he say this exactly ? Read between the lines Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 26 November, 2012 Share Posted 26 November, 2012 Read between the lines No pray tell, where in what he said did Pardew even imply anything about Guly ? Im interested ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Majestic Channon Posted 26 November, 2012 Share Posted 26 November, 2012 I'm surprised the society of black lawyers aren't complaining about guly's ommision Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stain Posted 26 November, 2012 Share Posted 26 November, 2012 No pray tell, where in what he said did Pardew even imply anything about Guly ? Im interested ? You're detracting from Turkish's backdown with this idiocy. Stop it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkish Posted 26 November, 2012 Share Posted 26 November, 2012 You're detracting from Turkish's backdown with this idiocy. Stop it. I'm not backdown, just admitting I made it up, plenty bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_clark Posted 26 November, 2012 Share Posted 26 November, 2012 I'm not backdown, just admitting I made it up, plenty bit. Shock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 26 November, 2012 Share Posted 26 November, 2012 You're detracting from Turkish's backdown with this idiocy. Stop it. Ahh Turks is alright, we have a special bond, we used to be bestests you know. Im allowed to disagree with him, he is allowed to disagree with me. We dont e-scrap on here though. Its all about the Krav for us titans of SWF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stain Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 Ahh Turks is alright, we have a special bond, we used to be bestests you know. Im allowed to disagree with him, he is allowed to disagree with me. We dont e-scrap on here though. Its all about the Krav for us titans of SWF I don't think you have any idea what this thread is about or what is being said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 I don't think you have any idea what this thread is about or what is being said. Meh If you really got your knickers in a twist over Guly supposedly having 15 minute clauses in his contract then I really am sorry for you, I suppose you'll believe that Cortese meddles in team tactics and selection too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 GULY has been average at best for nearly a whole year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkish Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 Ahh Turks is alright, we have a special bond, we used to be bestests you know. Im allowed to disagree with him, he is allowed to disagree with me. We dont e-scrap on here though. Its all about the Krav for us titans of SWF Used to be? We have that eternal bond and are such great mongboard buddies that even when we don't post on the same thread for ages, when we do it's like we've never stopped. This thread proves it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkish Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 Just to be clear, here is what happened. At a recent home game Guly came on with on 75 minutes, I noticed that had happened a few times in the past and when we played West Brom put a thread on the UI, 'will Guly come on with 15 minute to go?' thou and behold bang on 75 minutes, there he was. So I thought that'll be a funny thing to wind up the Mongs on TSW with and see how many bite, I'll pretend I'd been told he had a clause in his contract that was when he was fit he had to play for at least 15 minutes. It was funny watching so many people questioned it and went to great lengths to prove something that was so obviously bulls*it wasn't true. Even now people are going on about it. Anyway, I'm going to be sensible for a while now and only post serious things as I know how upset some of you get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank's cousin Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 Just to be clear, here is what happened. At a recent home game Guly came on with on 75 minutes, I noticed that had happened a few times in the past and when we played West Brom put a thread on the UI, 'will Guly come on with 15 minute to go?' thou and behold bang on 75 minutes, there he was. So I thought that'll be a funny thing to wind up the Mongs on TSW with and see how many bite, I'll pretend I'd been told he had a clause in his contract that was when he was fit he had to play for at least 15 minutes. It was funny watching so many people questioned it and went to great lengths to prove something that was so obviously bulls*it wasn't true. Even now people are going on about it. Anyway, I'm going to be sensible for a while now and only post serious things as I know how upset some of you get. Not upset Turks, confused maybe as to why this amuses you so much - I bite as do others, could we say we are providing a public service to meet your special needs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkish Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 Not upset Turks' date=' confused maybe as to why this amuses you so much - I bite as do others, could we say we are providing a public service to meet your special needs?[/quote'] So it wasn't you having drunken rants the other night then?!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DT Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 Perhaps we bought out the clause. Or are just ignoring it and telling him to see us in court. Either way, it's working. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dig Dig Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 .......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 If GULY was fit, he would probably find a cure for aids Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shurlock Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 Just to be clear, here is what happened. At a recent home game Guly came on with on 75 minutes, I noticed that had happened a few times in the past and when we played West Brom put a thread on the UI, 'will Guly come on with 15 minute to go?' thou and behold bang on 75 minutes, there he was. So I thought that'll be a funny thing to wind up the Mongs on TSW with and see how many bite, I'll pretend I'd been told he had a clause in his contract that was when he was fit he had to play for at least 15 minutes. It was funny watching so many people questioned it and went to great lengths to prove something that was so obviously bulls*it wasn't true. Even now people are going on about it. Anyway, I'm going to be sensible for a while now and only post serious things as I know how upset some of you get. Just had a look at the thread on the UI -and you were peddling the same s**t there. It seems that you do honestly believe it. Or did. Or are you going to claim that was also a wind-up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkish Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 Just had a look at the thread on the UI -and you were peddling the same s**t there. It seems that you do honestly believe it. Or did. Or are you going to claim that was also a wind-up Yes yes it is! You've got me. It's one of the many true things i have posted on the innnernezzz mongboards and i am now pretending it is a wind up because i care so much what you all think of me and i made myself look silly by claiming that I had managed to find out the contents of a players contract somehow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dig Dig Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 Wow, it's going to be hard to believe ANYTHING Turkish says after this shocking revelation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank's cousin Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 So it wasn't you having drunken rants the other night then?!! Rants yes, Drunken No, maybe a little fuelled by soem of New Zealand's finest, but to old for excess these days... A good rant lets off a bit of steam old boy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkish Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 Wow, it's going to be hard to believe ANYTHING Turkish says after this shocking revelation. I am a fat, scruffy, middle aged virgin that doesnt wash. FACT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkish Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 Rants yes' date=' Drunken No, maybe a little fuelled by soem of New Zealand's finest, but to old for excess these days... A good rant lets off a bit of steam old boy[/quote'] Do you question something is missing from your life if you find it nessasary to rant on an internet mongboard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony F Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 (edited) Pardew lost his job because he wouldnt play Guly! Said as much yesterday On 28 August 2010, Alan Pardew's Saints team won 4-0 at Bristol Rovers and shortly after that Pards was sacked. National press were incredulous at the timing. This forum was alive with theories, including one that Guly had been bought by NC without reference to Pardew. The story continues that Pardew didn't rate him, nor want to play him. NC told Pardew that Guly would play OR ELSE. Pardew brought Guly on with 5 mins of the 90 left (sub for Scheiderlin), Although Saints won 4-0 Pards was unceremonously sacked (for complying with the directive but taking the p*ss) and also, it seems, signed a gagging order as nothing has ever been revealed about the reasons or events leading to his departure. (apology that this is a re-hacked post from another thread but it does answer the question to some degree, I think....) Edited 27 November, 2012 by Tony F Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank's cousin Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 Do you question something is missing from your life if you find it nessasary to rant on an internet mongboard? Nope, perfectly happy, but nice to know you care - letting off the frustrations and stresses of work on the saints web internet 'mongboardTM' (sic) - cleanses the soul and means Mrs FC and sprog dont have an old grumpy stressed out fecker to deal with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dig Dig Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 On 28 August 2010, Alan Pardew's Saints team won 4-0 at Bristol Rovers and shortly after that Pards was sacked. National press were incredulous at the timing. This forum was alive with theories, including one that Guly had been bought by NC without reference to Pardew. The story continues that Pardew didn't rate him, nor want to play him. NC told Pardew that Guly would play OR ELSE. Pardew brought Guly on with 5 mins of the 90 left (sub for Scheiderlin), Although Saints won 4-0 Pards was unceremonously sacked (for complying with the directive but taking the p*ss) and also, it seems, signed a gagging order as nothing has ever been revealed about the reasons or events leading to his departure. (apology that this is a re-hacked post from another thread but it does answer the question to some degree, I think....) What question does it answer? Stick to 9/11 conspiracies or somthing lad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shurlock Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 On 28 August 2010, Alan Pardew's Saints team won 4-0 at Bristol Rovers and shortly after that Pards was sacked. National press were incredulous at the timing. This forum was alive with theories, including one that Guly had been bought by NC without reference to Pardew. The story continues that Pardew didn't rate him, nor want to play him. NC told Pardew that Guly would play OR ELSE. Pardew brought Guly on with 5 mins of the 90 left (sub for Scheiderlin), Although Saints won 4-0 Pards was unceremonously sacked (for complying with the directive but taking the p*ss) and also, it seems, signed a gagging order as nothing has ever been revealed about the reasons or events leading to his departure. (apology that this is a re-hacked post from another thread but it does answer the question to some degree, I think....) Long, long ago in a place far, far away.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony F Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 What question does it answer? The question it tries to answer is the much asked one: "so why WAS Pardew sacked?" A question that has been aired on this forum numerous times, was widely posed in national press at the time and which raised its head again this week with the return of Pardew to St Mary's with Newcastle. Strictly speaking, the answer is "no-one knows" but in reality at least 2 people do....... and in the meantime there have been many various guesses and attempt. Mine is just one such; conspiracy theory or not. HTH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony F Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 Long, long ago in a place far, far away.... Bristol really isn't that far away you know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glasgow_Saint Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 On 28 August 2010, Alan Pardew's Saints team won 4-0 at Bristol Rovers and shortly after that Pards was sacked. National press were incredulous at the timing. This forum was alive with theories, including one that Guly had been bought by NC without reference to Pardew. The story continues that Pardew didn't rate him, nor want to play him. NC told Pardew that Guly would play OR ELSE. Pardew brought Guly on with 5 mins of the 90 left (sub for Scheiderlin), Although Saints won 4-0 Pards was unceremonously sacked (for complying with the directive but taking the p*ss) and also, it seems, signed a gagging order as nothing has ever been revealed about the reasons or events leading to his departure. (apology that this is a re-hacked post from another thread but it does answer the question to some degree, I think....) Nigel was "very close" to walking for similar reasons before the 'showdown' talks earlier this month Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dig Dig Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 The question it tries to answer is the much asked one: "so why WAS Pardew sacked?" A question that has been aired on this forum numerous times, was widely posed in national press at the time and which raised its head again this week with the return of Pardew to St Mary's with Newcastle. Strictly speaking, the answer is "no-one knows" but in reality at least 2 people do....... and in the meantime there have been many various guesses and attempt. Mine is just one such; conspiracy theory or not. HTH So the reality is that it doesn't answer "the question" to any degree? HTH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony F Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 So the reality is that it doesn't answer "the question" to any degree? Sorry if you don't see it.........and observing the warning in your user name.......... but I think its as plausable an answer as any. And Glasgow Saints recent post points to a suggestion that there may be (may be, not IS) ongoing smoke from this particular pile of sticks. And if that indicates a fire which Mr Adkins has recently stamped on and extinguished - then good for him (and probably the club). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkish Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 So the reality is that it doesn't answer "the question" to any degree? HTH It's confirmed my view on it. HTH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony F Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 Thanks Turkish - so does that mean that if you, Glasgow and me see the possibility of this theory having some modicum of truth, I no longer need to submit the paperwork of self-referral to the asylum? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dig Dig Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 Sorry if you don't see it.........and observing the warning in your user name.......... but I think its as plausable an answer as any. And Glasgow Saints recent post points to a suggestion that there may be (may be, not IS) ongoing smoke from this particular pile of sticks. And if that indicates a fire which Mr Adkins has recently stamped on and extinguished - then good for him (and probably the club). If you're relying on a post from Glasgow Saint to add weight to your argument, it's pretty thin to say the least. (no offence Glasgow) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkish Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 Thanks Turkish - so does that mean that if you, Glasgow and me see the possibility of this theory having some modicum of truth, I no longer need to submit the paperwork of self-referral to the asylum? In a court you need at least two witnesses to attend to testify, based on what i've heard and your statement, you can count on me to be one of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkish Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 If you're relying on a post from Glasgow Saint to add weight to your argument, it's pretty thin to say the least. (no offence Glasgow) Are you trying to mug Glasgow off and make him look like a toby in front of his mongboard mates? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony F Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 But - with Turkish also on board this changes everything - right????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank's cousin Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 On 28 August 2010, Alan Pardew's Saints team won 4-0 at Bristol Rovers and shortly after that Pards was sacked. National press were incredulous at the timing. This forum was alive with theories, including one that Guly had been bought by NC without reference to Pardew. The story continues that Pardew didn't rate him, nor want to play him. NC told Pardew that Guly would play OR ELSE. Pardew brought Guly on with 5 mins of the 90 left (sub for Scheiderlin), Although Saints won 4-0 Pards was unceremonously sacked (for complying with the directive but taking the p*ss) and also, it seems, signed a gagging order as nothing has ever been revealed about the reasons or events leading to his departure. ... and you believe Nige was happy to work in such an environment and accept these decisions?.... A different take is that whatever 'interference' comes form upstairs whether there is truth in it or not, ultimately its all about whether we progress or not. Does the set up, whatever it is, allow the club to succeed on the pitch? Two promotions, heavy investmnet in both players and infrastructure would seem to suggest something is working - Sure we may have 100 different opinions on what the policy SHOULD be, Sure we can all point to what are in our HOs mistakes made, but the proof is always in the pudding - does it work? I was once, perhaps rightly, criticised for using a defence for Lowe, that it mattered not that there was logic in the strategy or approach, but if it did not work, it was pointless - now some seem to be saying the opposite, that the approach and strategy are more imporatnt than the evidence of the success we have had/having... some want it both ways as it enables a criticism of thsoe in charge no matter what... strange. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dig Dig Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 Thanks Turkish - so does that mean that if you, Glasgow and me see the possibility of this theory having some modicum of truth, I no longer need to submit the paperwork of self-referral to the asylum? Turkish has admitted making up Guly stories on this very thread and Glasgow Saint hasn't made a serious post on this forum I doubt ever. I'd recruit a new crew if I were you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkish Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 But - with Turkish also on board this changes everything - right????? I am mongboard royalty, When i speak others do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkish Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 Turkish has admitted making up Guly stories on this very thread and Glasgow Saint hasn't made a serious post on this forum I doubt ever. I'd recruit a new crew if I were you. You mess with my Krew you mess with me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank's cousin Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 Nigel was "very close" to walking for similar reasons before the 'showdown' talks earlier this month Are these the talks that Weston (who spoke with player family) said never happened and were a figment of media and fan speculation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dig Dig Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 You mess with my Krew you mess with me. You don't want to start a mong-turf war with me son. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkish Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 You don't want to start a mong-turf war with me son. I'm on the verge of ordering one of my Krew to take out a hit on you via PM. You have been warned. Pipedown or you'll be wacked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony F Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 ... and you believe Nige was happy to work in such an environment and accept these decisions?.... No I absolutely don't think that Nigel would have been happy with this as his start point for a managerial career but I think it's fair to say that, on Day One, he did not know about these things. However over time he has found out, and initially was struggling to keep the boss happy without entering into a direct conflict - but sometime after the "we play 4-3-3" quote on TV (was it after the West Brom match?), he felt he had no choice but to face up to the man, tell him he'll do things his way and be judged accordingly, and since then the team has progressed in a manner that pleases us all. Which is why I feel it is significant that "the ghost of Bristol Rovers away" may finally have been exorcised. If Nigel can keep our newly-found run of form going, we stay up this season and move on from a firm foundation, it will be something he just may be able to look back on as a major turning point in both his career and the club's fortune. And also keep his bed free of horses heads ...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now