Dry Toast Posted Sunday at 00:13 Posted Sunday at 00:13 He wanted to leave more than once and has come up short again. None of us outside of his family should invest any emotion in his future unless you are a masochist. He's set for life, barring some horrendous financial decisions. Well done to him and his advisors. We don't need him back here, that is certain. 9
saintant Posted Sunday at 09:33 Posted Sunday at 09:33 11 hours ago, St. Ciervo said: Looking forward to buying him back for peanuts. Telling an introverted "quiet boy" to "take his finger out" is not going to be a successful approach. He needs to be boosted. I would imagine Moyes is quite a tough manager to work for and has now run out of patience with the softly softly approach. This is his way of telling Tyler the honeymoon period is well and truly over and it's time for him to start performing.
East Kent Saint Posted Sunday at 13:17 Posted Sunday at 13:17 I would suggest he needs careful handling and his rebirth may take some time , he needs personal coaching to understand he is part of a team . He needs to realise that assisting other members of the team is a good thing and just being on the pitch is not enough . He needs to understand that just waiting for an opportunity is not the way to go etc . Things he should have been taught at Saints , you could say if he dosen't fit in why bother but developing youngsters is important. 1
beatlesaint Posted Sunday at 20:13 Posted Sunday at 20:13 6 hours ago, East Kent Saint said: I would suggest he needs careful handling and his rebirth may take some time , he needs personal coaching to understand he is part of a team . He needs to realise that assisting other members of the team is a good thing and just being on the pitch is not enough . He needs to understand that just waiting for an opportunity is not the way to go etc . Things he should have been taught at Saints , you could say if he dosen't fit in why bother but developing youngsters is important. I would suggest Everton totally ignored the chance to do some homework on him before spending big bucks. After the Chelsea debacle the warning signs were there. That’s why I’m surprised he left when he did but hey ho not our problem anymore. 4
St. Ciervo Posted Sunday at 21:25 Posted Sunday at 21:25 11 hours ago, saintant said: I would imagine Moyes is quite a tough manager to work for and has now run out of patience with the softly softly approach. This is his way of telling Tyler the honeymoon period is well and truly over and it's time for him to start performing. I responded to a Moyes-type coach growing up. But I see that coaching style falling out of favor these days with my teenaged students. Kiddos don't respond like we did back in the day... OMG, I sound like an old man. I imagine that is starting to funnel up to professionals, as well (hence RM was a hit with the squad). 1
macca155 Posted yesterday at 09:42 Posted yesterday at 09:42 We mustn't forget the lad is exceptionally talented. Game changing players like him are very rare. Everton paid for the potential, but seem to have forgotten their responsibility to nurture that talent. Particularly as he is quite introverted and in need of a gentle touch. RM was good at that, it certainly isn't Moyes's style. Now they have a broken player on their hands. They should have paid less, but arranged a loan back to Saints. The one place he was comfortable with. Both teams would have been winners. Both Chelsea and City are good at loaning youngsters, and retaining those that live up to their billing. It seems a good model. 2
Willo of Whiteley Posted yesterday at 09:54 Posted yesterday at 09:54 Let’s not get too carried away. He looked decent at times but was largely ineffective for us. The reason he gets hyped up is: - He’s from the academy - He’s English - He was one of the best in an awful barrel of players last season You could argue that Ryan Manning was a better player for us last season than him. He probably was. 1
malcolm waldron Posted yesterday at 10:12 Posted yesterday at 10:12 17 minutes ago, Willo of Whiteley said: Let’s not get too carried away. He looked decent at times but was largely ineffective for us. The reason he gets hyped up is: - He’s from the academy - He’s English - He was one of the best in an awful barrel of players last season You could argue that Ryan Manning was a better player for us last season than him. He probably was. Hopefully Everton will pay £40M for him this summer too then... 1 6
Colinjb Posted yesterday at 10:12 Posted yesterday at 10:12 12 hours ago, St. Ciervo said: I responded to a Moyes-type coach growing up. But I see that coaching style falling out of favor these days with my teenaged students. Kiddos don't respond like we did back in the day... OMG, I sound like an old man. I imagine that is starting to funnel up to professionals, as well (hence RM was a hit with the squad). You see it in the classroom. A disciplinarian would just be ridiculed by children now, it becomes a game to get a reaction and run rings around them. Maintaining high standards whilst building positive relationships is a big challenge, often seemingly opposing in aim.... But not impossible. RM clearly couldn't maintain high standards of approach in the areas that needed discipline even if he could (and it was his clear strength) get the players on side. 1
Baird of the land Posted yesterday at 10:31 Posted yesterday at 10:31 42 minutes ago, macca155 said: We mustn't forget the lad is exceptionally talented. Game changing players like him are very rare. Everton paid for the potential, but seem to have forgotten their responsibility to nurture that talent. Particularly as he is quite introverted and in need of a gentle touch. RM was good at that, it certainly isn't Moyes's style. Now they have a broken player on their hands. They should have paid less, but arranged a loan back to Saints. The one place he was comfortable with. Both teams would have been winners. Both Chelsea and City are good at loaning youngsters, and retaining those that live up to their billing. It seems a good model. Everton do seem to have given opportunities to young players this season and some of them are thriving. Honestly, he probably needs the kick up the arse (everton feeling they need to loan a chelsea youngster) as he's been coasting since early last season. 1
saintant Posted yesterday at 10:41 Posted yesterday at 10:41 56 minutes ago, macca155 said: We mustn't forget the lad is exceptionally talented. Game changing players like him are very rare. Everton paid for the potential, but seem to have forgotten their responsibility to nurture that talent. Particularly as he is quite introverted and in need of a gentle touch. RM was good at that, it certainly isn't Moyes's style. Now they have a broken player on their hands. They should have paid less, but arranged a loan back to Saints. The one place he was comfortable with. Both teams would have been winners. Both Chelsea and City are good at loaning youngsters, and retaining those that live up to their billing. It seems a good model. Unfortunately for Tyler he arrived with a huge fee weighing him down so, like fans across the country, Everton's are looking for signs that the money wasn't wasted. You can't blame them so Tyler is going to have to start looking like he's interested in getting them off their seats. 2
saintant Posted yesterday at 10:43 Posted yesterday at 10:43 29 minutes ago, Colinjb said: You see it in the classroom. A disciplinarian would just be ridiculed by children now, it becomes a game to get a reaction and run rings around them. Maintaining high standards whilst building positive relationships is a big challenge, often seemingly opposing in aim.... But not impossible. RM clearly couldn't maintain high standards of approach in the areas that needed discipline even if he could (and it was his clear strength) get the players on side. I can't imagine any players trying to ridicule Moyes to be honest 🙂
St. Ciervo Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Maybe not outwardly. But not responding well or shutting down, absolutely. 1
suewhistle Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago I think it's called 'sulking'. 'Dumb insolence' in the army, I believe..
Colinjb Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 6 hours ago, St. Ciervo said: Maybe not outwardly. But not responding well or shutting down, absolutely. Which is what you will see from the quieter kids/less inclined to be twats in a classroom in that situation.
redandwhitey Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago But these aren’t kids in a classroom, they are young men earning a small fortune every month. 100% effort every day as a minimum in my book. Sulking ?? Bollocks !
Colinjb Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 22 minutes ago, redandwhitey said: But these aren’t kids in a classroom, they are young men earning a small fortune every month. 100% effort every day as a minimum in my book. Sulking ?? Bollocks ! Have you ever been in a dressing room? They may be in theory grown men, in practice they are single minded over grown adolescents with more money then sense and egos to match. Match that with various different little sub groups and cliques, all with the slightly different behavioural trends. I stand by the comparison. Edited 1 hour ago by Colinjb
Saint86 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) On 08/02/2026 at 00:13, Dry Toast said: He wanted to leave more than once and has come up short again. None of us outside of his family should invest any emotion in his future unless you are a masochist. He's set for life, barring some horrendous financial decisions. Well done to him and his advisors. We don't need him back here, that is certain. Agree, there is no point stressing about his future - other than to probably look at it as an example of how the footballing industry chews up youngsters and spits them out. End of the day he's a young lad (clearly sensitive/sheltered/other etc.) that had an Agent adivisng him not to extend (and to go for a big move) and a selling club that were probably pretty damn keen for the money (if we're all being honest). He's been badly advised (i think thats obvious), and clearly he now isn't happy with the move - which may ultimately kill his career with respect to the potential he has. I hope personally that he gets through this period and at least has a decent career in the prem, because otherwise that would just be a tremendous waste of his potential and a real shame - and on a human level, no one wants to see that happen. For purely footballing reasons, he blatantly should have stayed at saints and had a year dominating the championship, with a team being built around him where he can grow into himself. Grealish shin pad comparison incoming, but i think had he done this he could have had that kind of growth and progression. Perhaps Lallana is another example, stay and learn with less pressure, become a main man in the team, develop your abilities and confidence without the spotlight, and then take your well earned big move later in your career. Dibling had a higher potential than Lallana for their respective ages, difference is one of them worked their way up the football league in their younger years... But money talks - and so saints, his agent, and indeed his own wage packet, have all done well in the short term. Edited 1 hour ago by Saint86 1
swannymere Posted 46 minutes ago Posted 46 minutes ago Leave the lad alone, he's clearly struggling and nobody should be happy at this; also anyone saying that they would'nt have moved to a bigger club and better money that could set them up for life is delusional. PS this is my current opinion, tomorrow i'll be up for being part of the mob.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now