Holmes_and_Watson Posted August 1 Posted August 1 1 hour ago, badgerx16 said: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4g4djgdyk2o ".....on this occasion, Yehuda Shimon, a lawyer with an organisation that represents Israelis arrested for violence against Palestinians, agreed to speak." "He told me that attacks on Palestinian villages last weekend were justified as revenge for the killing of the outpost's security guard. "I think now, after they killed one Israeli, we need to kill all the people in Tal and Sarra, even Jit and Farata," he said, naming the Palestinian villages closest to the outpost. I put it to him that he was equating one Jewish life with hundreds or even thousands of Palestinian lives. "No," he said, "millions. One Jewish life, it's 10 million [Palestinians]." Challenged on the racism of his statement, he did not deny it. "Yes, I know," he replied. "But this is the truth, because God chose us [and] because of this you are jealous."," Yes HAMAS need to be removed as a terrorist force, but until a way is found to deal with people like this there cannot be a lasting peace in the Middle East. I was just going to post it. I was just coming up with a SaintsWeb Sentence to show by linking to this dreadful loon's quotes, I wasn't endorsing it.
Gloucester Saint Posted August 1 Posted August 1 4 hours ago, Holmes_and_Watson said: I was just going to post it. I was just coming up with a SaintsWeb Sentence to show by linking to this dreadful loon's quotes, I wasn't endorsing it. They’re revolting and a direct by-product of having a white supremacist government in the White House. One hopes once Trump is boxed in after November that Israel’s security and financial support is under review until their electorate pull their finger out and jettison the two Mad Bens. I doubt the Democrats have the bollocks to challenge them either sadly. 1
Holmes_and_Watson Posted August 1 Posted August 1 1 hour ago, Gloucester Saint said: They’re revolting and a direct by-product of having a white supremacist government in the White House. One hopes once Trump is boxed in after November that Israel’s security and financial support is under review until their electorate pull their finger out and jettison the two Mad Bens. I doubt the Democrats have the bollocks to challenge them either sadly. That extreme of Israel realise that this has turned out to be their best chance to essentially ethnically cleanse the area of Palestinians. Whether they justify it through revenge for conflicts generated through their encroaching settlements, revenge for the Hamas attacks, general racism or using a book. Whether those reasons are religious or for self enrichment through property grabs. They must be so frustrated that their government and the US were not extreme enough to remove Palestinians altogether, or have whoever remained surrender everything they own. They must look with disappointment at all those historic conflicts with one clear winner, and a wiped out or subservient loser. 1
egg Posted August 1 Author Posted August 1 It's interesting to note that those previously supportive of Israel on here have gone quiet. I hope that means that they now acknowledge that the behaviour of the IDF (in Gaza, West Bank, and Lebanon) is and has been an utter disgrace. 3
egg Posted August 2 Author Posted August 2 3 settlements now proposed in Gaza. No surprise. https://aje.news/rlfmko?update=4823185
Weston Super Saint Posted August 2 Posted August 2 3 hours ago, egg said: 3 settlements now proposed in Gaza. No surprise. https://aje.news/rlfmko?update=4823185 Which one is Trump building? 1
sadoldgit Posted August 3 Posted August 3 (edited) I got hammered by the usual suspects for saying that the IDF killed many of their own on 7th October. It has now been admitted. Edited August 3 by sadoldgit
badgerx16 Posted August 3 Posted August 3 (edited) 34 minutes ago, sadoldgit said: I got hammered by the usual suspects for saying that the IDF killed many of their own on 7th October. It has now been admitted. It has not "now been admitted". Thisi is old news. The interview in which he said this was in early February 2025. Edited August 3 by badgerx16
whelk Posted August 3 Posted August 3 No you didn’t. It was your rabid anti-semitic views desperate to give equivalence and/or deflection to a barbaric murderous Hamas attack on civilians. 3
Weston Super Saint Posted August 3 Posted August 3 7 hours ago, sadoldgit said: I got hammered by the usual suspects for saying that the IDF killed many of their own on 7th October. It has now been admitted. Your self imposed, much trumpeted sabattical from the Lounge didn't last long then. It's almost like you can't resist.
whelk Posted August 14 Posted August 14 On 01/08/2026 at 17:26, egg said: It's interesting to note that those previously supportive of Israel on here have gone quiet. I hope that means that they now acknowledge that the behaviour of the IDF (in Gaza, West Bank, and Lebanon) is and has been an utter disgrace. I guess I am counted as one of these? If it helps, regarding the settlers, I wish the IDF would apply the same tactics to them ie shoot the fucking cunts.
egg Posted August 14 Author Posted August 14 1 hour ago, whelk said: I guess I am counted as one of these? If it helps, regarding the settlers, I wish the IDF would apply the same tactics to them ie shoot the fucking cunts. I'm not sure you were the strongest Whelk. Duck, in particular, has/had this belief that the Israelis are a peaceful lot, and that all would be well if their neighbours were more tolerant of them. Hypo got upset when I, rightly, described him as naive on the issue. On the wider issue, we've not yet seen the tip of the iceberg. 2
badgerx16 Posted August 14 Posted August 14 (edited) Netanyahu has described the UK as "...the Islamic republic of Great Britain", and will be the first nuclear armed Islamic republic. This is of course incorrect, the first was Pakistan. Edited August 14 by badgerx16 1
egg Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago Now turning up the heat in Syria. Chunks of the West occupied (plus Golan), attacks to the north, coupled with veiled threats to Turkey which Bibi has said is due to "security", but basically means Turkey will stop them doing what they want. So Gaza destroyed and occupied, the west bank being eroded daily, more settlements promised, southern Lebanon smashed up and occupied, western Syria occupied, and now teeing up for a scrap with Turkey. Fair play to Turkey for doing more than strongly worded letters, but the west beed to do more about this expansionism and behaviour.
badgerx16 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 25 minutes ago, egg said: Now turning up the heat in Syria. Chunks of the West occupied (plus Golan), attacks to the north, coupled with veiled threats to Turkey which Bibi has said is due to "security", but basically means Turkey will stop them doing what they want. So Gaza destroyed and occupied, the west bank being eroded daily, more settlements promised, southern Lebanon smashed up and occupied, western Syria occupied, and now teeing up for a scrap with Turkey. Fair play to Turkey for doing more than strongly worded letters, but the west beed to do more about this expansionism and behaviour. Article 5 of lthe NATO charter ?
egg Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, badgerx16 said: Article 5 of lthe NATO charter ? It'll be a test for sure. I suspect the line will be that Turkey were the aggressor, so article 5 shouldn't apply, or some nonsense.
Farmer Saint Posted 48 minutes ago Posted 48 minutes ago 2 hours ago, egg said: Now turning up the heat in Syria. Chunks of the West occupied (plus Golan), attacks to the north, coupled with veiled threats to Turkey which Bibi has said is due to "security", but basically means Turkey will stop them doing what they want. So Gaza destroyed and occupied, the west bank being eroded daily, more settlements promised, southern Lebanon smashed up and occupied, western Syria occupied, and now teeing up for a scrap with Turkey. Fair play to Turkey for doing more than strongly worded letters, but the west beed to do more about this expansionism and behaviour. I don't think picking on Turkey is a wise thing to do. They have a fair old army, and it is very technically advanced. They are not Iran mark 2. Oh, and obviously they're part of NATO.
egg Posted 34 minutes ago Author Posted 34 minutes ago (edited) 18 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said: I don't think picking on Turkey is a wise thing to do. They have a fair old army, and it is very technically advanced. They are not Iran mark 2. Oh, and obviously they're part of NATO. Israel could attack any NATO country and article 5 wouldn't get invoked, and Turkey wouldn't have entered into the middle east defence pact if they had confidence in NATO article 5 support. Edited 29 minutes ago by egg
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now