Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said:

Typical response. Tells others to Google it whereas he calls you out for not providing links.

Here he is “mr I can’t answer any questions” - do you have the 5 replies to my questions. Where did I ever call him out for not sharing links? Question 6

I’ve given him the name of the report and there is only one government report with that name.  He wants me to be his secretary. I’m not stupid I know how his weird mind works it’s a sad attempt at a power play, which I won’t enter into.  Come back when you have the answers rather than hiding behind your friends

Edited by Sir Ralph
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Weston Super Saint said:

The question you added in your edit after I quoted you?

Absolutely, yes.  That's exactly what Mrs WSS has done having gained ILR over 25 years ago.

You've previously mentioned you are a Reform supporter.  Do you agree that those that have integrated into society, paid their taxes, worked and not had a penny in benefits should have their ILR cancelled?

I can’t remember which bit I edited - I was probably trying to ensure accuracy. I’m not a reform supporter as such Iprobably more of a conservative.

Eveb if I did vote for them doesn’t mean I agree with every policy. ILR shouldn’t be cancelled in cases such as your wife on the assumption she has contributed to British society through working and taxes and isn’t a criminal (I’m not making a disparaging comment I’m just stating some criteria which could void ILR)

Edited by Sir Ralph
Posted
7 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

Here he is “mr I can’t answer any questions” - do you have the 5 replies to my questions. I’ve given him the name of the report and there is only one government report with that name.  He wants me to be his secretary. I’m not stupid I know how his weird mind works it’s a sad attempt at a power play, which I won’t enter into.  Come back when you have the answers rather than hiding behind your friends

You haven't given me the name - you just said Home Affairs Select Committee. That's just a site. Why won't you just send me the link? There is no power play here, you have quoted statistics based on something you've read, yet you won't post the site. Just asking you to post where you got them from.

Have you read the articles/reports I sent?

Posted
47 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

Here he is “mr I can’t answer any questions” - do you have the 5 replies to my questions. Where did I ever call him out for not sharing links? Question 6

I’ve given him the name of the report and there is only one government report with that name.  He wants me to be his secretary. I’m not stupid I know how his weird mind works it’s a sad attempt at a power play, which I won’t enter into.  Come back when you have the answers rather than hiding behind your friends

Hahahaha.

You really are a condescending smeghead. 

All questions answered. Not my issue if you're too lazy to go back and see.

  • Like 3
Posted
1 hour ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said:

Hahahaha.

You really are a condescending smeghead. 

All questions answered. Not my issue if you're too lazy to go back and see.

image.png.ac8422469a75d6feb488e5d69e2f32ac.png

Posted
5 hours ago, Farmer Saint said:

You've got to be some sort of moron to defend these planks.

I could even understand someone defending the general idea of what he is doing and still think he is a fucking idiot.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
51 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Some of you lot need to go for a beer or a wank, maybe both

Sank a bottle of Perla - wonderful Polish Pils - whilst watching Cheltenham beat Chesterfield 2-1 in a highly entertaining contest.

Great to watch two sides going at it at a consistently high tempo unlike the plodding sideways shit beloved of SR.

Finn Azaz was on loan there a few years ago and still remembered fondly by the Robins faithful.

I see Harrogate whacked Beastleigh 4-1. Carlisle 5th from bottom - Rob Elliott still a crap manager. Sacked Mark Hughes after 93 points and appointed that plum instead. 

Edited by Gloucester Saint
Contest, not context
  • Like 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Sank a bottle of Perla - wonderful Polish Pils - whilst watching Cheltenham beat Chesterfield 2-1 in a highly entertaining contest.

Great to watch two sides going at it at a consistently high tempo unlike the plodding sideways shit beloved of SR.

Finn Azaz was on loan there a few years ago and still remembered fondly by the Robins faithful.

Did you knock one out in the toilet?

  • Haha 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Sank a bottle of Perla - wonderful Polish Pils - whilst watching Cheltenham beat Chesterfield 2-1 in a highly entertaining contest.

Great to watch two sides going at it at a consistently high tempo unlike the plodding sideways shit beloved of SR.

Finn Azaz was on loan there a few years ago and still remembered fondly by the Robins faithful.

I see Harrogate whacked Beastleigh 4-1. Carlisle 5th from bottom - Rob Elliott still a crap manager. Sacked Mark Hughes after 93 points and appointed that plum instead. 

Yes good win today back up to 4th I’d have liked to have gone today but missus has got a 100 quid M&S voucher so had to go to the big one in Leeds so she could spend all afternoon looking round that FFS. Don’t go much anymore as most of sons futsal games are on a Saturday and involves quite a bit of travelling to away games. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
21 hours ago, Sir Ralph said:

We’re going round In circles. The figures show a huge difference - around 360 blm protests resulting in 135 arrests compared with 250 protests and 1,804 arrests for illegal migrant protests. The stats prove a significant and marked jump in arrests for lesser protests by illegal migrant protesters.

Youre justification is a perceived threat which means this radical jump in arrests is justified. I don’t think your explanation gets close to covering it. Hence why the police are being accused of being two tier.
 

I think those stats are misleading.

The BLM protests were generally peaceful, and over a short period - the arrests reflect the exceptions, and of course, when sudden outbursts in large protests could have been higher.

The illegal immigrant protests have been over longer periods, involved organised riots, setting fire to hotels, looting shops, and attacking mosques over sustained periods. Over 100 officers injured. 

There are people who will always join in for violent sport, get too agitated etc, across the spectrum however the nature of the EFL led right wing protests is violent criminals ( Tommy and Tommo) stoking crowds to make money.

Police and courts have a long history of right wing bias.

 

Edited by West end Saints
  • Like 3
Posted
19 hours ago, Farmer Saint said:

You haven't given me the name - you just said Home Affairs Select Committee. That's just a site. Why won't you just send me the link? There is no power play here, you have quoted statistics based on something you've read, yet you won't post the site. Just asking you to post where you got them from.

Have you read the articles/reports I sent?

I guess not then.

Posted

Breaking: Several men have been arrested overnight on suspicion of offences under the Explosives Act amid what appears to be a threat to RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire, a major base for US operations in Iran.

The security posture has also been stepped up at US airbases in Suffolk, with an air ambulance denied access to Mildenhall airspace last night while returning to base.

It remains unclear who has been arrested and what stage the potential plot was at, but the police operation comes months after the IRGC made threats towards Fairford and the "British monarchy regime". 

This week, GB News revealed that American personnel at bases in Suffolk had not been made aware of plans to house small boat migrants at RAF Barnham. 

One councillor told me that when he spoke to some USAF officers about the possibility of unvetted Iranian migrants being placed near the base, "They had no idea about what was going on there. They had no idea what was planned for there."

Several Iranians who have crossed the Channel illegally have been arrested by counter-terror cops. 

The IRGC has claimed that it controls several smuggling routes and that covert operators have been moved into Britain.

So far the Trump administration has mentioned the RAF Barnham plans and the security risks it poses to the US airbases. But after these arrests and the major security shift, what will they think of potentially having unvetted Iranian migrants near to some of their critical bases?

Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

Just can't back yourself, can you. You've not given me a report name, a date etc, you've just given me Home Affairs Select Committee.

I've tried to be cordial, I've tried to get you to explain yourself, supply statistics, supply links and evidence, but as ever - unfortunately - you just can't do it. I was warned by @egg TBF, I just thought you may try if I gave you the respect and the chance. Turns out I was wrong.

Shame.

Back on ignore you go, you can sit back with the racists, nonces and uneducated - it suits you well.

Edited by Farmer Saint
Posted
21 hours ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said:

Hahahaha.

You really are a condescending smeghead. 

All questions answered. Not my issue if you're too lazy to go back and see.

Absolute rubbish you haven’t answered any questions I asked. You didn’t even answer my latest question.
 

There is no point engaging with you. You run off when you are asked anything. 

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said:

Just can't back yourself. I've tried to be cordial, I've tried to get you to explain yourself, supply statistics, supply links and evidence, but as ever, unfortunately, you just can't do it. I was warned by @egg TBF, I just thought you may try if I gave you the respect and the chance. Turns out I was wrong.

Shame.

Not really I gave you the stats and the report name you can do the rest if you want to. Shame if you can’t.
 

You and egg giving me a chance. What a privilege! It’s as if you think I need to earn your respect - the perception of self importance is interesting . 

Edited by Sir Ralph
Posted
1 minute ago, Sir Ralph said:

Not really I gave you the stats and the report name you can do the rest if you want to. Shame if you can’t

You haven't given me the report name.

Posted
Just now, Sir Ralph said:

Absolute rubbish you haven’t answered any questions I asked. You didn’t even answer my latest question.
 

There is no point engaging with you. You run off when you are asked anything. 

You avoid a question, but pose all sorts of vaguely related (at best) questions, then demand your questions are answered whilst claiming you've answered the initial question. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

Not really I gave you the stats and the report name you can do the rest if you want to. Shame if you can’t.
 

You and egg giving me a chance. What a privilege! It’s as if you think I need to earn your respect - the perception of self importance is interesting . 

Egg wasn't giving you a chance - he has consistently said you're a uneducated fraud. I was giving you a chance, and yes, you do need to earn the respect of people, especially when you spend your time making yourself look more and more foolish every day.

Posted
1 hour ago, Osvaldorama said:

 

One councillor told me that when he spoke to some USAF officers about the possibility of unvetted Iranian migrants being placed near the base, "They had no idea about what was going on there. They had no idea what was planned for there."

Which councillor told you this and when did you see them?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...