Farmer Saint Posted Friday at 18:11 Posted Friday at 18:11 1 hour ago, Mixedkebab said: Yes, they are humans, and most humans are cunty- you just don’t know any other cultures personally except your rural English cunty middle class pals. Always trying to show off, but no-one cares what you say 😂
Farmer Saint Posted Friday at 18:14 Posted Friday at 18:14 1 hour ago, Osvaldorama said: So you’re racist? Nice How does that make me a racist - the English aren't a race, they're an ethnicity?
Farmer Saint Posted Friday at 18:15 Posted Friday at 18:15 1 hour ago, Weston Super Saint said: So any family that has roots in England for over 500 years, but that may have come from Norway or Germany, cannot possibly be "English" as they will not share the Anglo Saxon roots. I would suggest you take a look at your own family tree as this may well preclude you. That would be awful wouldn't it? He's sounding very much like Hitler isn't he? 1
badgerx16 Posted Friday at 18:33 Posted Friday at 18:33 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said: He's sounding very much like Hitler isn't he? "If you were as blond as Hitler, as fit as Goering, as tall as Goebbels, as intelligent as Bormann, and with the eyesight of Himmler, you would be the perfect Aryan". Edited Friday at 18:34 by badgerx16 1
egg Posted Friday at 18:45 Posted Friday at 18:45 1 hour ago, Osvaldorama said: On what planet am I losing this argument 😂 You guys have raised nothing except insults and pretending not to know what ‘English’ means Well he asked you a question and replied with your usual leftist bollox. That's not the sign of a bloke winning the argument. That's feet stamping.
badgerx16 Posted Friday at 19:35 Posted Friday at 19:35 (edited) 50 minutes ago, egg said: Well he asked you a question and replied with your usual leftist bollox. That's not the sign of a bloke winning the argument. That's feet stamping. I have actually asked 6 questions ; At what point do immigrant families become entitled to claim "Englishness" ? So what were they before 927AD ? Where did all the non Anglo-Saxons go in that year ? As with my earlier post, were my wife's parents Scottish, Welsh, or English ? If they were Welsh and Scottish, what is my wife's ethnicity ? So anybody descended from the Norman invaders isn't English ? Are Kernewek speakers not English ? And he accuses "leftists" of avoiding giving answers. Edited Friday at 19:36 by badgerx16
Osvaldorama Posted Friday at 20:52 Posted Friday at 20:52 2 hours ago, Farmer Saint said: He's sounding very much like Hitler isn't he? If ethnicity doesn’t exist, what was the Holocaust?
Osvaldorama Posted Friday at 20:59 Posted Friday at 20:59 1 hour ago, badgerx16 said: I have actually asked 6 questions ; At what point do immigrant families become entitled to claim "Englishness" ? So what were they before 927AD ? Where did all the non Anglo-Saxons go in that year ? As with my earlier post, were my wife's parents Scottish, Welsh, or English ? If they were Welsh and Scottish, what is my wife's ethnicity ? So anybody descended from the Norman invaders isn't English ? Are Kernewek speakers not English ? And he accuses "leftists" of avoiding giving answers. Im not answering because your questions are fucking daft. You’re pretending not to know what an English person is, like a school child would do
badgerx16 Posted Friday at 21:02 Posted Friday at 21:02 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said: Im not answering because your questions are fucking daft. You’re pretending not to know what an English person is, like a school child would do You are not answering because the questions show up your hypocrisy and ignorance. Edited Friday at 21:02 by badgerx16 1 1 1
Farmer Saint Posted Friday at 21:11 Posted Friday at 21:11 18 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said: If ethnicity doesn’t exist, what was the Holocaust? Where did I say ethnicity doesn't exist?
Farmer Saint Posted Friday at 21:28 Posted Friday at 21:28 (edited) 28 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said: Im not answering because your questions are fucking daft. You’re pretending not to know what an English person is, like a school child would do If they're so daft you should be able to smash them out the path. My guess is a low IQ individual as yourself is just not a serious person, and so can't answer his "daft" questions. Edited Friday at 21:28 by Farmer Saint 1
Holmes_and_Watson Posted Saturday at 00:07 Posted Saturday at 00:07 6 hours ago, Osvaldorama said: you’re doing it again Go and look in a dictionary. English and Ethnicity are very very clearly defined words. If someone were to say that they are English, I've not seen a post here that is saying that it doesn't exist. This seems to be something you're projecting. There has been discussion on what "English" means to different people. The definition you agree with is :- "The English are an ethnic group and nation native to England, defined historically by a shared ancestry originating from Anglo-Saxon and Celtic roots, as well as a common language, culture, and history." And this is why I asked. "The English are an ethnic group and nation native to England." - If native means place of birth, that's anyone born here. "...defined historically by a shared ancestry originating from Anglo-Saxon and Celtic roots." - People born/ citizens of here can and do share in the history/ culture of the nation, adding to it as lots of people have done since it started being a nation. If, in your view, they are to be added together, then it really falls apart. The Celtic Britons included what would be Welsh and Cornish speakers for a start. So there goes the common language, and that shared ancestry goes across different countries. The Anglo-Saxons might have got a unified England going. There's a massive influx of cultures across the period from when the Angles and the Saxons arrived. But, to give you your definition, you are English if you can trace your line back to Alfred or even AEthelstan. Except there were the successful invasions by the Danes and the Normans. Events that very much shaped England. But that's not included in your definition. So, anyone post-Norman conquest or possibly any number of Scandinavian raids and settlers don't count as English. There's not even a union flag to wave, under your definition, as that didn't make an appearance until the 17th century. Perhaps they can tie other people's comments about leftists to lamp posts instead. 3
badgerx16 Posted Saturday at 07:24 Posted Saturday at 07:24 7 hours ago, Holmes_and_Watson said: If someone were to say that they are English, I've not seen a post here that is saying that it doesn't exist. This seems to be something you're projecting. There has been discussion on what "English" means to different people. The definition you agree with is :- "The English are an ethnic group and nation native to England, defined historically by a shared ancestry originating from Anglo-Saxon and Celtic roots, as well as a common language, culture, and history." And this is why I asked. "The English are an ethnic group and nation native to England." - If native means place of birth, that's anyone born here. "...defined historically by a shared ancestry originating from Anglo-Saxon and Celtic roots." - People born/ citizens of here can and do share in the history/ culture of the nation, adding to it as lots of people have done since it started being a nation. If, in your view, they are to be added together, then it really falls apart. The Celtic Britons included what would be Welsh and Cornish speakers for a start. So there goes the common language, and that shared ancestry goes across different countries. The Anglo-Saxons might have got a unified England going. There's a massive influx of cultures across the period from when the Angles and the Saxons arrived. But, to give you your definition, you are English if you can trace your line back to Alfred or even AEthelstan. Except there were the successful invasions by the Danes and the Normans. Events that very much shaped England. But that's not included in your definition. So, anyone post-Norman conquest or possibly any number of Scandinavian raids and settlers don't count as English. There's not even a union flag to wave, under your definition, as that didn't make an appearance until the 17th century. Perhaps they can tie other people's comments about leftists to lamp posts instead. Childish, Marxist, nonsense. 1 2
Weston Super Saint Posted Saturday at 07:50 Posted Saturday at 07:50 7 hours ago, Holmes_and_Watson said: There's not even a union flag to wave, under your definition, as that didn't make an appearance until the 17th century. Perhaps they can tie other people's comments about leftists to lamp posts instead. Presumably we'd all have to get behind the flag of Essex which is believed to be the oldest flag representing the Kingdom of Essex?
Holmes_and_Watson Posted Saturday at 07:54 Posted Saturday at 07:54 26 minutes ago, badgerx16 said: Childish, Marxist, nonsense. I refuse to accept any opinion that's not backed up with a meme. 🙂 Just now, Weston Super Saint said: Presumably we'd all have to get behind the flag of Essex which is believed to be the oldest flag representing the Kingdom of Essex? Will it look as good on a lamppost, to cry into and to be as shaggable?
badgerx16 Posted Saturday at 08:05 Posted Saturday at 08:05 14 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said: Presumably we'd all have to get behind the flag of Essex which is believed to be the oldest flag representing the Kingdom of Essex? The banner of Aethelstan, first King of England..... The cross of St George didn't enter use until at least the 14th century. 1
Sheaf Saint Posted Saturday at 08:26 Posted Saturday at 08:26 12 minutes ago, badgerx16 said: The banner of Aethelstan, first King of England..... The cross of St George didn't enter use until at least the 14th century. I wonder how Ossie and the rest of the flag-shaggers would react if a religious crusader from Cappadocia tried to enter Britain today? 🤔 1
Osvaldorama Posted Saturday at 08:40 Posted Saturday at 08:40 11 hours ago, Farmer Saint said: If they're so daft you should be able to smash them out the path. My guess is a low IQ individual as yourself is just not a serious person, and so can't answer his "daft" questions. So your high IQ argument is that ethnicity exists, to everyone except the English, because English people are cunts?
Weston Super Saint Posted Saturday at 08:41 Posted Saturday at 08:41 33 minutes ago, badgerx16 said: The banner of Aethelstan, first King of England..... The cross of St George didn't enter use until at least the 14th century. To be fair that looks like it would go well with the perfect description of an "English" person who hails from Aberdare. 1
Osvaldorama Posted Saturday at 08:41 Posted Saturday at 08:41 8 hours ago, Holmes_and_Watson said: If someone were to say that they are English, I've not seen a post here that is saying that it doesn't exist. This seems to be something you're projecting. There has been discussion on what "English" means to different people. The definition you agree with is :- "The English are an ethnic group and nation native to England, defined historically by a shared ancestry originating from Anglo-Saxon and Celtic roots, as well as a common language, culture, and history." And this is why I asked. "The English are an ethnic group and nation native to England." - If native means place of birth, that's anyone born here. "...defined historically by a shared ancestry originating from Anglo-Saxon and Celtic roots." - People born/ citizens of here can and do share in the history/ culture of the nation, adding to it as lots of people have done since it started being a nation. If, in your view, they are to be added together, then it really falls apart. The Celtic Britons included what would be Welsh and Cornish speakers for a start. So there goes the common language, and that shared ancestry goes across different countries. The Anglo-Saxons might have got a unified England going. There's a massive influx of cultures across the period from when the Angles and the Saxons arrived. But, to give you your definition, you are English if you can trace your line back to Alfred or even AEthelstan. Except there were the successful invasions by the Danes and the Normans. Events that very much shaped England. But that's not included in your definition. So, anyone post-Norman conquest or possibly any number of Scandinavian raids and settlers don't count as English. There's not even a union flag to wave, under your definition, as that didn't make an appearance until the 17th century. Perhaps they can tie other people's comments about leftists to lamp posts instead. So Erling Haaland is English and should have been made to play for England?
badgerx16 Posted Saturday at 08:42 Posted Saturday at 08:42 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said: So your high IQ argument is that ethnicity exists, to everyone except the English, because English people are cunts? Some of them. Edited Saturday at 08:58 by badgerx16
Farmer Saint Posted Saturday at 08:42 Posted Saturday at 08:42 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said: So your high IQ argument is that ethnicity exists, to everyone except the English, because English people are cunts? Nope, I've never said it doesn't exist - you brought that up. Perhaps you can show me where I said that. Edited Saturday at 08:43 by Farmer Saint
badgerx16 Posted Saturday at 08:50 Posted Saturday at 08:50 1 minute ago, Osvaldorama said: So Erling Haaland is English and should have been made to play for England? Which brings us back to what makes a person "English" ? 1) They live in England and identify as English. 2) They were born in England and identify as English. 3) They were born of one English parent. 4) They were born of two English parents. 5) They can trace back an unbroken pure bred line of "English" ancestors to 927AD. 6) Some other definition. But you will refuse to answer because either this is a childish question, or more likely, you are full of shit. 4
Farmer Saint Posted Saturday at 08:53 Posted Saturday at 08:53 1 minute ago, badgerx16 said: Which brings us back to what makes a person "English" ? 1) They live in England and identify as English. 2) They were born in England and identify as English. 3) They were born of one English parent. 4) They were born of two English parents. 5) They can trace back an unbroken pure bred line of "English" ancestors to 927AD. 6) Some other definition. But you will refuse to answer because either this is a childish question, or more likely, you are full of shit. The issue is he isn't a pure blood, he has dirty veins and as such should be deported. We don't need his like here.
Weston Super Saint Posted Saturday at 09:05 Posted Saturday at 09:05 13 minutes ago, badgerx16 said: Which brings us back to what makes a person "English" ? 1) They live in England and identify as English. 2) They were born in England and identify as English. 3) They were born of one English parent. 4) They were born of two English parents. 5) They can trace back an unbroken pure bred line of "English" ancestors to 927AD. 6) Some other definition. But you will refuse to answer because either this is a childish question, or more likely, you are full of shit. Oswald certainly looks completely out of his depth on this one. Maybe he should stick to memes and black shirts. 1
Winnersaint Posted Saturday at 09:10 Posted Saturday at 09:10 29 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said: So your high IQ argument is that ethnicity exists, to everyone except the English, because English people are cunts? Clearly some of them maybe. 2
egg Posted Saturday at 09:17 Posted Saturday at 09:17 34 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said: So Erling Haaland is English and should have been made to play for England? Any reason why couldn't have chosen to identify as English?
Holmes_and_Watson Posted Saturday at 09:52 Posted Saturday at 09:52 1 hour ago, Osvaldorama said: So Erling Haaland is English and should have been made to play for England? Haaland was indeed eligible to play for England, having been born there. He spent some of his early childhood in England too, I believe. The only person with a fixation in making people be a certain thing, even though you can't give a coherent definition, is yourself. Haaland had the option of picking Norway based on the rest of his upbringing. It was your own definition that said the English are native to England. This example shows things are a bit more fluid in the real world. Also by your definition, Haaland couldn't really be English unless he could trace family back to before the Norman conquest. No one is English, unless they can do that. You should be updating the FA on that. 2
Gloucester Saint Posted Saturday at 17:15 Posted Saturday at 17:15 Not difficult to work out who this scrote votes for 1
badgerx16 Posted Saturday at 18:13 Posted Saturday at 18:13 57 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: Not difficult to work out who this scrote votes for If that is what being "English" is then count me out. 2
Holmes_and_Watson Posted Saturday at 18:33 Posted Saturday at 18:33 17 minutes ago, badgerx16 said: If that is what being "English" is then count me out. Since badgers have been in what would become England for more than 50 000 years, you can't be English as your roots aren't Celtic or Anglo Saxon. 🙂
badgerx16 Posted Saturday at 18:52 Posted Saturday at 18:52 17 minutes ago, Holmes_and_Watson said: Since badgers have been in what would become England for more than 50 000 years, you can't be English as your roots aren't Celtic or Anglo Saxon. 🙂 So you lot are all incomers ? In which case 1
Holmes_and_Watson Posted Saturday at 18:57 Posted Saturday at 18:57 4 minutes ago, badgerx16 said: So you lot are all incomers ? In which case Typical badger. Set(t) in his ways. 🙂 1
West end Saints Posted Saturday at 23:38 Posted Saturday at 23:38 (edited) On 09/10/2026 at 17:50, Osvaldorama said: you’re doing it again Go and look in a dictionary. English and Ethnicity are very very clearly defined words. You are right, English is clearly defined. "An inhabitant of England." (Oxford English Dictionary). So if you want to use the dictionary definition an illegally arriving migrant is English on arrival! I am more comfortable with the citizenship criteria or even being able to play for the national team rules etc. But, I 100% wouldn't tell anyone they can't be English because of what their skins looks like. That is clearly racist and wrong. Edited yesterday at 07:20 by West end Saints 6
Mixedkebab Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago (edited) On 09/10/2026 at 19:11, Farmer Saint said: Always trying to show off, but no-one cares what you say 😂 You aren’t even Southampton, you out of town, shire inhabiting, privileged, prejudiced bastard Get on a strictly come dancing thread on mums net with your cheese eating, Mainstream, guitar based rock gammon pals Up the fucking saints by the way, you stay away bitch Edited 12 hours ago by Mixedkebab
Mixedkebab Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago (edited) On 09/10/2026 at 22:28, Farmer Saint said: If they're so daft you should be able to smash them out the path. My guess is a low IQ individual as yourself is just not a serious person, and so can't answer his "daft" questions. It’s the “park” you gammon prick, not the “path”. Cosseted, comfortable, bigoted, every advantage in life from your poncey parents but still low iq as fuck This over privileged out of town lot on here like you and one or two others are tiresome and pompous to say the least. Edited 11 hours ago by Mixedkebab
Farmer Saint Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 8 hours ago, Mixedkebab said: It’s the “park” you gammon prick, not the “path”. Cosseted, comfortable, bigoted, every advantage in life from your poncey parents but still low iq as fuck This over privileged out of town lot on here like you and one or two others are tiresome and pompous to say the least. Blimey, been drinking on a Sunday night have we? Yes, should have checked the phone autocorrect for "park" I agree. No poncey parents here unfortunately, not sure why you've assumed that. Grew up in a standard semi on outskirts of Southampton, so no privilege here, apart from being white of course and born into a first world country. Anyway, I hope you had a lovely evening, and I hope your kids and wife weren't subjected to this anger. At least with you being angry on the internet I'm providing a service to your unfortunate family. Don't drink kids! Edited 2 hours ago by Farmer Saint
egg Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, Farmer Saint said: Blimey, been drinking on a Sunday night have we? Yes, should have checked the phone autocorrect for "park" I agree. No poncey parents here unfortunately, not sure why you've assumed that. Grew up in a standard semi on outskirts of Southampton, so no privilege here, apart from being white of course and born into a first world country. Anyway, I hope you had a lovely evening, and I hope your kids and wife weren't subjected to this anger. At least with you being angry on the internet I'm providing a service to your unfortunate family. Don't drink kids! Mixedhisdrinks has certainly taken a shine to you mate. 2
Farmer Saint Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 15 minutes ago, egg said: Mixedhisdrinks has certainly taken a shine to you mate. Very odd behaviour, I've never really noticed him until recently, but only noticed him because he just comes on here to try and be a hardman and shout insults at me 😂 2
badgerx16 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 36 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said: Very odd behaviour, I've never really noticed him until recently, but only noticed him because he just comes on here to try and be a hardman and shout insults at me 😂 Imagine a night out with him, Ossie, and Wade G. 2
Farmer Saint Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 8 minutes ago, badgerx16 said: Imagine a night out with him, Ossie, and Wade G. Christ, that'd be a nightmare. I think the issue is they fancy me. I don't blame them TBH.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now