Weston Super Saint Posted May 17 Posted May 17 Just now, Matthew Le God said: Yet again, you fail to address anything in the post. Top avoidance! There's nothing to address in the post. If you don't think 'Leadership' (or lack thereof), 'Governance' (or lack thereof) and 'Financial Stabililty' (or lack thereof and most certainly a reduction thereof) of a football club contribute to the 'abject failure' of said football club, then you are clearly still 'not getting it'. I'm glad you're able to use chat GBT. It's a pity you can't apply your learnings to real world situations.
ChrisPY Posted May 17 Posted May 17 Would you rather have penises for fingers or a pinky finger for a penis? 3
Turkish Posted May 17 Posted May 17 20 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said: The same applies to responsibilities as it does duties. While CEOs share core responsibilities (like financial sustainability, governance, and leadership), the emphasis and scope of those responsibilities vary depending on the club’s size, structure, ownership, and current goals. One CEO might be a strategist, another a day-to-day operator, it’s not one-size-fits-all. Kraft or Ankersen may have had responsibilities people are trying to use as something to tarnish Pasons with. We just do not know! The very nature of Saints being a part of a wider group makes things less clear in regard to who is in charge of strategy. No it doesn’t
Weston Super Saint Posted May 17 Posted May 17 Just now, ChrisPY said: Would you rather have penises for fingers or a pinky finger for a penis? How big are the penises?
Matthew Le God Posted May 17 Posted May 17 6 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said: There's nothing to address in the post. If you don't think 'Leadership' (or lack thereof), 'Governance' (or lack thereof) and 'Financial Stabililty' (or lack thereof and most certainly a reduction thereof) of a football club contribute to the 'abject failure' of said football club, then you are clearly still 'not getting it'. I'm glad you're able to use chat GBT. It's a pity you can't apply your learnings to real world situations. Yet again, you've cherry picked bits out of a reply without reading them in the context they were written. Quote While CEOs share core responsibilities (like financial sustainability, governance, and leadership), the emphasis and scope of those responsibilities vary depending on the club’s size, structure, ownership, and current goals. One CEO might be a strategist, another a day-to-day operator, it’s not one-size-fits-all. Kraft or Ankersen may have had responsibilities people are trying to use as something to tarnish Pasons with. We just do not know! The very nature of Saints being a part of a wider group makes things less clear in regard to who is in charge of strategy. Consider those things you listed in the context of a post that includes the bits I've put in bold.
Matthew Le God Posted May 17 Posted May 17 1 minute ago, Turkish said: No it doesn’t Which bit are you saying no to?
Turkish Posted May 17 Posted May 17 2 minutes ago, ChrisPY said: Would you rather have penises for fingers or a pinky finger for a penis? If you were to suck your own finger in the first option does that class as giving yourself a BJ?
Weston Super Saint Posted May 17 Posted May 17 Just now, Matthew Le God said: Yet again, you've cherry picked bits out of a reply without reading them in the context they were written. Consider those things you listed in the context of a post that includes the bits I've put in bold. They are irrelevant - some might say they are a strawman argument - as there is only one CEO. I haven't 'cherry picked' just not bothered with your add on bits that are unnecessary.
ChrisPY Posted May 17 Posted May 17 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said: How big are the penises? Range between 4-7 inches so the ratio remains as you’d see on a normal fingered hand from thumb to pinky. Girth would follow the same rules so the thumb is likely to be short but wide. Edited May 17 by ChrisPY
Turkish Posted May 17 Posted May 17 1 minute ago, ChrisPY said: Range between 4-7 inches so the ratio remains as you’d see on a normal fingered hand from thumb to pinky. How long are they?
Weston Super Saint Posted May 17 Posted May 17 2 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said: Consider those things you listed in the context of a post that includes the bits I've put in bold. Again, you've got yourself confused between 'duties' and 'responsibilities'. Some of those tasks 'may' be duties assigned to the people you listed, but the 'responsibility' for them lies with the CEO. Maybe use chat GBT to tell you the difference between the two? 1
Matthew Le God Posted May 17 Posted May 17 Just now, Weston Super Saint said: They are irrelevant - some might say they are a strawman argument - as there is only one CEO. I haven't 'cherry picked' just not bothered with your add on bits that are unnecessary. They are not irrelevant at all. Are you denying that strategy decisions can be made above the level of CEO when that CEO is only in charge of one part of a wider group with a parent company? We've already had journalists mention Ankersen being involved in decisions. 2
Weston Super Saint Posted May 17 Posted May 17 2 minutes ago, ChrisPY said: Range between 4-7 inches so the ratio remains as you’d see on a normal fingered hand from thumb to pinky. Girth would follow the same rules so the thumb is likely to be short but wide. Definitely the pinky as a penis then - otherwise I'd have hands like King Charles and sir Keir would want even more sausages freed.
Matthew Le God Posted May 17 Posted May 17 1 minute ago, Weston Super Saint said: Maybe use chat GBT to tell you the difference between the two? Maybe you should learn what it is called.
Weston Super Saint Posted May 17 Posted May 17 Just now, Matthew Le God said: They are not irrelevant at all. Are you denying that strategy decisions can be made above the level of CEO when that CEO is only in charge of one part of a wider group with a parent company? We've already had journalists mention Ankersen being involved in decisions. See.above.
Weston Super Saint Posted May 17 Posted May 17 Just now, Matthew Le God said: Maybe you should learn what it is called. Not whilst it upsets you so much 1
ChrisPY Posted May 17 Posted May 17 3 minutes ago, Turkish said: If you were to suck your own finger in the first option does that class as giving yourself a BJ? I’m not sure sucking a cock is always classed as a BJ. Some cocksuckers have different responsibilities so I’d need to check with ChatGPT. 3
Weston Super Saint Posted May 17 Posted May 17 Just now, ChrisPY said: I’m not sure sucking a cock is always classed as a BJ. Some cocksuckers have different responsibilities so I’d need to check with ChatGPT. GBT 1
Matthew Le God Posted May 17 Posted May 17 1 minute ago, ErwinK1961 said: Do you guys know it’s sunny outside at the moment? In the garden, children playing, garden furniture on decking, pint in hand and having a pointless argument with @Turkish Carlsberg don't do sunny days, but if they did! 😉😇
Holmes_and_Watson Posted May 17 Posted May 17 2 hours ago, ChrisPY said: Would you rather have penises for fingers or a pinky finger for a penis? Would the pinky finger as a penis automatically rise when I raise a glass? Could save money on pills later on. 🙂
Fitzhugh Fella Posted May 18 Posted May 18 22 hours ago, Fabrice29 said: Wouldn't mind a bit more on this FF... Most of what was said is now out there. AA agent/family were making ridiculous demands. They were/are interested in Rohl but at the time the compo was at least 10m which was prohibitive. PP did not rule him out in the future (this was pre Spors mind) but they also were concerned Rohl's eventual sightsmay might be more in the direction of Germany or Austria. 3
Smirking_Saint Posted May 18 Posted May 18 22 hours ago, Matthew Le God said: The radio silence is deafening @Turkish Talking of deafening I see you completely ignored my post pertaining to the fact Parsons was directly implicated in being obstructive to our summer transfer business Tbh though, ive been on this forum for probably best part of 20 years, quite how the mods allow you to consistently derail basically every thread is beyond me 2
Matthew Le God Posted May 18 Posted May 18 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Smirking_Saint said: Talking of deafening I see you completely ignored my post pertaining to the fact Parsons was directly implicated in being obstructive to our summer transfer business That was all very vague and we do not know exactly what happened and the reasoning for it. Edited May 18 by Matthew Le God
Smirking_Saint Posted May 18 Posted May 18 2 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said: That was all very vague and we do not know exactly what happened and the reasoning for it. Things are always vague to protect sources But I can tell you it was part if the reason for Delap moving to Ipswich and why we almost lost out on Downes
Weston Super Saint Posted May 18 Posted May 18 8 minutes ago, Smirking_Saint said: Things are always vague to protect sources But I can tell you it was part if the reason for Delap moving to Ipswich and why we almost lost out on Downes You're beating your head against the wall unless you've got statements from 25 people all written and signed in their own blood with corresponding DNA tests.
Smirking_Saint Posted May 18 Posted May 18 8 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said: You're beating your head against the wall unless you've got statements from 25 people all written and signed in their own blood with corresponding DNA tests. Unfortunately Im well aware of MLGs MO Shame on me for continuing to be drawn in by it 1
SaintsLoyal Posted May 18 Author Posted May 18 Honestly are people still questioning this ? and YES his dibs have been all over the football stuff and agents mugging him off. Thats because its been a total failure by Sport Republic to hire a CEO that had football experience and instead we got someone from a hoover manufacturer that once played a handful of games for Woking FC ffs How did that happen ? They had several months plus from Martin Semmens leaving Parsons also has zero knowledge about brand image PR employing the toxic buffon Matt Le Tissier. Probably because Parsons is a mate of Glenn Cockerills Dont just take my word for it, have a scooby around the corridors of St Marys Stadium. 1
CSA96 Posted May 26 Posted May 26 (edited) 34 minutes ago, SaintsLoyal said: tick tock my space Edited May 26 by CSA96 1 1
Convict Colony Posted May 27 Posted May 27 On 16/05/2025 at 5:06 PM, Weston Super Saint said: Jesus wept. He is the CEO Matthew. Try and think of ALL the things he's responsible for. Give it your best, we're all rooting for you. Can someone fact check this please, only just catching up on the thread, thank you 2
SuperSAINT Posted May 27 Posted May 27 4 hours ago, Convict Colony said: On 16/05/2025 at 16:06, Weston Super Saint said: Jesus wept. He is the CEO Matthew. Try and think of ALL the things he's responsible for. Give it your best, we're all rooting for you. Can someone fact check this please, only just catching up on the thread, thank you #JesusWatch 1
Weston Super Saint Posted May 28 Posted May 28 14 hours ago, Convict Colony said: Can someone fact check this please, only just catching up on the thread, thank you 2
suewhistle Posted May 28 Posted May 28 Could WSS and MLG please get a room together? Then they could argue and compare pinkies, or whatever, and spare the rest of us who do not need to know or care how many angels can dance of the point of a needle, or whatever the argument has now descended to. Thank you. 3 2
Matthew Le God Posted May 28 Posted May 28 3 minutes ago, suewhistle said: Could WSS and MLG please get a room together? Then they could argue and compare pinkies, or whatever, and spare the rest of us who do not need to know or care how many angels can dance of the point of a needle, or whatever the argument has now descended to. Thank you. No need, I am no longer engaging with him and can't see his posts. 1
Convict Colony Posted May 29 Posted May 29 On 28/05/2025 at 9:46 AM, Weston Super Saint said: Sounds like Saintsforever website
Dman Posted May 30 Posted May 30 3 minutes ago, SaintsLoyal said: Not a word from Parsons, shameful I hate to go all MLG, but what exactly do you want him to say? 😂
Gloucester Saint Posted May 30 Posted May 30 (edited) 36 minutes ago, Dman said: I hate to go all MLG, but what exactly do you want him to say? 😂 Fancy a hoover or hand dryer at half price? Edited May 30 by Gloucester Saint 2
Turkish Posted May 30 Posted May 30 On 28/05/2025 at 09:09, Matthew Le God said: No need, I am no longer engaging with him and can't see his posts. 2023/24 saw the great sulk 2025/26 sees the great submission After years of being a willing opponent it was one defeat to many for MLG. Staggering around the forum punch drunk, getting ironed out every time he got onto a thread he finally threw in the towel. History will show that whilst he was a gallant opponent, he was was never quite good enough to compete at the top level against the elite posters. A kind of Frank Bruno, Ricky Hatton character, but significantly less popular. MLG should be applauded for his stamina and tenacity but most posters will agree he quit top level posting way too late. The damage already done to his reputation. However as those that were there will know, he was always an outsider looking in, desperately wanting to be part of the party but was the kid with his nose pressed up against the window wanting to be asked in whilst all the cool kids partied, but never getting the invite. 1
Tommy Mulgrew Posted May 30 Posted May 30 The level of intolerance, lack of understanding and empathy and sheer disregard for anyone who has a different outlook, opinion or behaviour on this forum is shocking. It’s time you all resolved to do better. If you did, this forum would be a better place. 1
Dman Posted May 30 Posted May 30 2 minutes ago, Tommy Mulgrew said: The level of intolerance, lack of understanding and empathy and sheer disregard for anyone who has a different outlook, opinion or behaviour on this forum is shocking. It’s time you all resolved to do better. If you did, this forum would be a better place. snowflake 1 1
Weston Super Saint Posted May 30 Posted May 30 1 hour ago, Tommy Mulgrew said: The level of intolerance, lack of understanding and empathy and sheer disregard for anyone who has a different outlook, opinion or behaviour on this forum is shocking. It’s time you all resolved to do better. If you did, this forum would be a better place. Indeed. Although there is only one poster who has admitted his posting style is deliberately belligerent, actively aiming to annoy and frustrate as many posters as possible with no apology or intention to change that posting style. Would you like one guess as to whom that may be? 1
Tommy Mulgrew Posted May 30 Posted May 30 His interests, motivations and communication style is different from those of most of us on here; I have no problem with that but do consider him annoying occasionally. I believe it acceptable to engage in gentle ribbing at times of his undoubted problem with an emphasis on logic and an inability to understand emotive considerations (plenty of other people have similar traits to a greater or lesser degree) but IMO the persistent persecution meted out on this forum by the anti-MLG gang is vastly OTT and reflects badly on those who do it. On balance, I think we gain from his ‘difference”; that might not be accepted by all - fair enough - but thinking otherwise does not justify the incessant abuse that he receives almost every day. You might find it amusing but others do not. Some tolerance and understanding would not go amiss. I totally understand your point of view but not your way of expressing it. Unedifying and unnecessary.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now