Gloucester Saint Posted January 4 Posted January 4 25 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said: Fuck off you absolute cunt. Atherley’s is open again tomorrow. He is excited that he has Ben Garner’s dry cleaning to do now. 2 3
hypochondriac Posted January 4 Posted January 4 3 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: Atherley’s is open again tomorrow. He is excited that he has Ben Garner’s dry cleaning to do now. Is he even a Saints fan? 1
tdmickey3 Posted January 4 Posted January 4 1 hour ago, Fabrice29 said: You don't have to watch you know. Or keep commenting on it. You didn't even enjoy it when we won games, mainly because your silly matter of fact opinions were being proven wrong. I'd walk away. Most on here wish you would walk away or are you waiting for Lego to get that big European job, unfortunately for us and you, it’s going to be a long wait 5
tdmickey3 Posted January 4 Posted January 4 Just now, hypochondriac said: Is he even a Saints fan? Just a club stooge
Fabrice29 Posted January 4 Posted January 4 6 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: Atherley’s is open again tomorrow. He is excited that he has Ben Garner’s dry cleaning to do now. 1 minute ago, tdmickey3 said: Just a club stooge Got the team news wrong but still a club stooge. Levels. 😎
Fabrice29 Posted January 4 Posted January 4 3 minutes ago, hypochondriac said: Is he even a Saints fan? Are you even a Saints fan if you're not advocating someone somewhere else comes up with a chant to let people you know at the club you don't like the 3 defenders strategy and in fact want more. Fair question. 2
Fabrice29 Posted January 4 Posted January 4 5 minutes ago, tdmickey3 said: Most on here wish you would walk away or are you waiting for Lego to get that big European job, unfortunately for us and you, it’s going to be a long wait Not just Lego. All the managers remember. No exceptions. Apart from the exceptions.
lambtiss Posted January 4 Posted January 4 16 minutes ago, hypochondriac said: Can we get a chant started against three at the back so the club are aware of the strength of feeling about it? We hate back 3 and we hate back 3, We hate back 3, and we hate back 3. We hate back 3 and we hate back 3. We are the back 3 haters.
lambtiss Posted January 4 Posted January 4 Nice to still see the 3 CB lineup that has defended so well all season ..
tdmickey3 Posted January 4 Posted January 4 1 minute ago, Fabrice29 said: Not just Lego. All the managers remember. No exceptions. Apart from the exceptions. Give it up stooge, we all see right through you. 1
tdmickey3 Posted January 4 Posted January 4 1 minute ago, lambtiss said: Nice to still see the 3 CB lineup that has defended so well all season .. But it’s going to work at some point 1
tdmickey3 Posted January 4 Posted January 4 6 minutes ago, Fabrice29 said: Got the team news wrong but still a club stooge. Levels. 😎 Dry cleaner who follows like a little lamb
SaintNewForest Posted January 4 Posted January 4 Just now, tdmickey3 said: But it’s going to work at some point Would that be when we start the greatest era in our history?
hypochondriac Posted January 4 Posted January 4 3 minutes ago, lambtiss said: We hate back 3 and we hate back 3, We hate back 3, and we hate back 3. We hate back 3 and we hate back 3. We are the back 3 haters. 3 at the back and you fucked it up. Why the fuck do we play 3? Why the fuck do we play 3? We want 4 at the back say we want 4 at the back
hypochondriac Posted January 4 Posted January 4 7 minutes ago, Fabrice29 said: Are you even a Saints fan if you're not advocating someone somewhere else comes up with a chant to let people you know at the club you don't like the 3 defenders strategy and in fact want more. Fair question. You got me. I just post on here for a laugh. 1
lambtiss Posted January 4 Posted January 4 1 minute ago, SaintNewForest said: Would that be when we start the greatest era in our history? When we had our long unbeaten run in the Champ under RM, wasn't it achieved with 2 CBs .. THB and Bednarek? I seem to remember the run came to an end when Captain Shoehorn became available 2 1
tdmickey3 Posted January 4 Posted January 4 4 minutes ago, SaintNewForest said: Would that be when we start the greatest era in our history? Could be
Farmer Saint Posted January 4 Posted January 4 2 minutes ago, hypochondriac said: 3 at the back and you fucked it up. Why the fuck do we play 3? Why the fuck do we play 3? We want 4 at the back say we want 4 at the back Like a modern day Bob Dylan. 1 1
Gloucester Saint Posted January 4 Posted January 4 2 minutes ago, hypochondriac said: You got me. I just post on here for a laugh. I was going to ask him if the beetroot stain on my dry clean only top I did yesterday might come out fully. 2
Fabrice29 Posted January 4 Posted January 4 1 minute ago, lambtiss said: When we had our long unbeaten run in the Champ under RM, wasn't it achieved with 2 CBs .. THB and Bednarek? I seem to remember the run came to an end when Captain Shoehorn became available Stephens was an unused sub against Bristol when that run came to an end. We played 4 at the back. 1
hypochondriac Posted January 4 Posted January 4 We only waaaant four defenders waaaant four defenders. We're walking along singing a song moaning at the club for playing five.
tdmickey3 Posted January 4 Posted January 4 1 minute ago, Gloucester Saint said: I was going to ask him if the beetroot stain on my dry clean only top I did yesterday might come out fully. I believe his area of expertise is for hair gel removal 1
DellBlockH Posted January 4 Posted January 4 28 minutes ago, hypochondriac said: Can we get a chant started against three at the back so the club are aware of the strength of feeling about it? Most people, outside of this forum, really don't give a toss about formation, just results and performance. 1 2
Gloucester Saint Posted January 4 Posted January 4 Just now, tdmickey3 said: I believe his area of expertise is for hair gel removal And other fluids if Rasmus has visited and watched a 50 pass goalkeeper-CBs-Manning passing move. 1
Gloucester Saint Posted January 4 Posted January 4 Just now, DellBlockH said: Most people, outside of this forum, really don't give a toss about formation, just results and performance. Results and performance are directly linked to the fact midfield is conceded every single game and free headers are regularly conceded with 3 CBs. HTH. 5
saintant Posted January 4 Posted January 4 1 minute ago, DellBlockH said: Most people, outside of this forum, really don't give a toss about formation, just results and performance. Not another one 🙂 1
tdmickey3 Posted January 4 Posted January 4 Just now, Gloucester Saint said: And other fluids if Rasmus has visited and watched a 50 pass goalkeeper-CBs-Manning passing move. Nah, not needed, he just gulps those down 2
Gloucester Saint Posted January 4 Posted January 4 (edited) 1 minute ago, saintant said: Not another one 🙂 The club is getting more plants on this forum than Hilliers has in stock. Edited January 4 by Gloucester Saint 1 1
Fabrice29 Posted January 4 Posted January 4 Just now, Gloucester Saint said: Results and performance are directly linked to the fact midfield is conceded every single game and free headers are regularly conceded with 3 CBs. HTH. Our results and performances have been better with 3 CB's this season than 2. HTH. 1
LGTL Posted January 4 Posted January 4 2 minutes ago, DellBlockH said: Most people, outside of this forum, really don't give a toss about formation, just results and performance. Ah good. You can join the ‘formation makes no difference to results’ group. I think the chairman is Fabrice. 2 2
lambtiss Posted January 4 Posted January 4 3 minutes ago, Fabrice29 said: Stephens was an unused sub against Bristol when that run came to an end. We played 4 at the back. You know the point I was making. We had the best run of results in recent history playing 2 CBs. We brought Stephens back into the fold and started to play 3 CBs at the back and the results were much poorer. 3 CBs has never really worked for Saints. 2
hypochondriac Posted January 4 Posted January 4 5 minutes ago, DellBlockH said: Most people, outside of this forum, really don't give a toss about formation, just results and performance. Not sure you talk to but a number of people I talk to irl have brought up us playing so defensively whilst not winning games. 2
Fabrice29 Posted January 4 Posted January 4 Just now, lambtiss said: You know the point I was making. We had the best run of results in recent history playing 2 CBs. We brought Stephens back into the fold and started to play 3 CBs at the back and the results were much poorer. 3 CBs has never really worked for Saints. Yeah I know the point you were making. And the point I was making was it's not true. I just made mine with the facts. Never really worked except for the only time we've actually won games in a row this season. 1
tdmickey3 Posted January 4 Posted January 4 Just now, hypochondriac said: Not sure you talk to but a number of people I talk to irl have brought up us playing so defensively whilst not winning games. Ankerson 1
lambtiss Posted January 4 Posted January 4 3 minutes ago, Fabrice29 said: Our results and performances have been better with 3 CB's this season than 2. HTH. Please provide the stats to support that. 1
hypochondriac Posted January 4 Posted January 4 5 minutes ago, Fabrice29 said: Our results and performances have been better with 3 CB's this season than 2. HTH. How many games have we played with 2 cbs under this manager? 1
lambtiss Posted January 4 Posted January 4 1 minute ago, Fabrice29 said: Yeah I know the point you were making. And the point I was making was it's not true. I just made mine with the facts. Never really worked except for the only time we've actually won games in a row this season. You have just ignored the general point I was making by taking a sample if 1 match. Are you hard of thinking? 1
Fabrice29 Posted January 4 Posted January 4 1 minute ago, lambtiss said: Please provide the stats to support that. The two games that specifically come to mind this season we played 2 CB's are Hull and Portsmouth.
Fabrice29 Posted January 4 Posted January 4 (edited) 1 minute ago, lambtiss said: You have just ignored the general point I was making by taking a sample if 1 match. Are you hard of thinking? I just responded the the point you made. 15 minutes ago, lambtiss said: When we had our long unbeaten run in the Champ under RM, wasn't it achieved with 2 CBs .. THB and Bednarek? I seem to remember the run came to an end when Captain Shoehorn became available If you want to make more general point that isn't "the run came to an end when Stephens was shoehorned in" you're more than welcome to point to that evidence and I'll respond to that instead? Edited January 4 by Fabrice29
Lord Duckhunter Posted January 4 Posted January 4 1 minute ago, Fabrice29 said: The two games that specifically come to mind this season we played 2 CB's are Hull and Portsmouth. 2 horrendous performances, but they’ll be some excuse for that I’m sure. It can’t be 4 at the back because that’s the answer to all our problems. With our full backs, playing 4 at the back would be suicidal and our attacking performance won’t better Charlton, Leicester, Birmingham or WBA either…. 2
lambtiss Posted January 4 Posted January 4 1 minute ago, Fabrice29 said: The two games that specifically come to mind this season we played 2 CB's are Hull and Portsmouth. So 2 games are enough for you to write off trying out 2 CBs? That's silly, and not how stats work We also kept a clean sheet against Portsmouth. So you could claim that 50% of our matches with 2 CBs were clean sheets. 2
Colinjb Posted January 4 Posted January 4 "Same ol' shit, different day... Sports Republic go away......"
Fabrice29 Posted January 4 Posted January 4 5 minutes ago, hypochondriac said: How many games have we played with 2 cbs under this manager? 0. 1 minute ago, lambtiss said: So 2 games are enough for you to write off trying out 2 CBs? That's silly, and not how stats work We also kept a clean sheet against Portsmouth. So you could claim that 50% of our matches with 2 CBs were clean sheets. Well, not quite. There's also the wins we've had with 3 CB's. 1 1
OneMrsWallace Posted January 4 Posted January 4 13 minutes ago, LGTL said: Ah good. You can join the ‘formation makes no difference to results’ group. I think the chairman is Fabrice. Given that formation appears irrelevant for some, time for TE to test that theory with the primary school 'everyone up top' ploy. 1
DellBlockH Posted January 4 Posted January 4 12 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: Results and performance are directly linked to the fact midfield is conceded every single game and free headers are regularly conceded with 3 CBs. HTH. You may be right. You probably are. I was just commenting that getting a chant going about a formation is unlikely. I have never heard the people who sit near me, who are not shy of criticising just about every other aspect of the team and club, say "It's all down to playing 3 at the back". But thank you for the, not-at-all patronising lesson in football tactics. I will bear it in mind at the next home game and will be chanting "Not 3 at the back" if we're not winning by at least 3 goals.
lambtiss Posted January 4 Posted January 4 8 minutes ago, Fabrice29 said: I just responded the the point you made. If you want to make more general point that isn't "the run came to an end when Stephens was shoehorned in" you're more than welcome to point to that evidence and I'll respond to that instead? My original comment was that "I seem to remember the run came to an end when Captain Shoehorn became available". Your counter-evidence was that he was on the bench for the match when the run came to an end. So, you actually proved my point despite mis-quoting me.
S-Clarke Posted January 4 Posted January 4 Count me surprised when I just looked at the table and saw Watford, batshit crazy Watford, on their 3959395th manager of the season, in 4th. Whilst we're languishing down in 15th. The quality of the league this year is rubbish, there are no standout teams like there has been in the past. Yet we're somehow still contriving to be bottom half. No one can defend this, surely. Being mid-table in this league is like being marooned in a cesspit of misery. It's a horrible existence of nothingness. 'The championship is a great league, it's fun' argument falls down the pan when it's like this. It's misery. 2
Fabrice29 Posted January 4 Posted January 4 (edited) 3 minutes ago, lambtiss said: My original comment was that "I seem to remember the run came to an end when Captain Shoehorn became available". Your counter-evidence was that he was on the bench for the match when the run came to an end. So, you actually proved my point despite mis-quoting me. So did our run come to an end when we stopped play 2 CB's yeah? Btw, when Stephens actually played as a 3rd CB/Left back in the next game - we got back to winning ways. Just FYI. Edited January 4 by Fabrice29
Miltonaggro Posted January 4 Posted January 4 45 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: Atherley’s is open again tomorrow. He is excited that he has Ben Garner’s dry cleaning to do now. He’s banned from Atherley after Carbonaragate in 2010. Four made to measure Armani mini suits ruined. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now