CB Fry

Being that a metropolitan establishment man from London is the current Prime Minister and was also Prime Minister 2010-6 (and countless times before that) then it's hardly the worst idea in the world.

Latest poll puts RLB in front with the members. Absolute party time in Conservative central office if she wins. https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/labour-party/news/109116/labour-leadership-race-wide-open-poll-puts

Maya Yoshida cannot be the next Prime Minister. I don't think the public will believe that he is strong enough on defence.

Back on the actual topic instead of chatting absolute sh it about voter age and inclination. Those champions of democracy, Momentum, are playing an absolute blinder at the moment. North Korea me right up. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/labour-leadership-momentum-member-ballot-deputy-candidates-a9283826.html

Don't worry. I'm sure someone will be along in a minute to agree with you about how jolly awful I am.

Conflating the seismic changes happening to the print newspaper industry with political party affiliations is utterly moronic even by your exceptional standards.

Fair enough, I wasn't aware of that. Thanks. Her father was a Marxist academic so has something in common with Ed Miliband.

Can't say I am particularly hung up on my own gender or skin colour. I'm stuck with both and I don't think I have spent a nanosecond of my entire life being concerned about either. Thanks for your concern sweetheart. I think Starmer will get "the point" that you dismiss as irrelevant that piling on votes and vote and votes in safe Labour metropolitan seats is not going to actually allow the Labour party to win power and influence people's lives.

So, just to recap, hes done fu ck all and will go to the grave having done fu ck all. Still, you've previously stated you are wealthy enough to never have any concern with government legislation that impact the lives of the poorest so for you its only ever been about purity posturing. The archetypal Corbyn supporter. Cretins to a fu cking man. Lastly, as has been explained countless times on here, vote share is absolutely irrelevant. You get to govern not by stacking up vanity votes in Islington but by having enough broad appeal to win in Worcester or Workington or Swindon. Funnily enough he never got near that. Keep wa nking over your utterly pointless graph.

All white, too. Unfortunately for those with an interest in gender equality Starmer is by far the stand out candidate. Nandy strongest female and then after that three I don't think are remotely up to it. Jess Phillips does not have the gravitas/composure. Good for a soundbite and the new leader needs her in the tent. Long Bailey utterly vacuous Cretin disciple. Making gaffes all over the shop and shoes barely started. Also she has eyes like pi ss holes in the snow. And Thornbury is utterly repellent and voters would hate her. So Kier or Lisa for me.

Do a graph on all the legislation Jeremy Corbyn has passed that will have a actual impact on people's lives. Try and include every single one.

I don't remember telling anyone to "lighten up" on a thread that they have spent the whole time grizzling about the dystopian Orwellian state we are all apparently living in.

Yeah, because you've been a fu cking barrel of laughs on this thread so far.

Why would Boris Johnson have suddenly stood on a Remain ticket in an election he called specifically to deliver Brexit?

Funny that it's on all the newspapers and websites though. Is that just a spectacular coincidence?

I do hope you're not paying attention to evil newspaper journalists. They just make it all up, you know.

If Jesus had wept he would have wept to this post.

Surely we now all agree that anyone who slagged off the owner, or our transfer activities or new signings in the summer were just impatient and fickle fans who didn't have a clue what they were talking about? Because, as I understand it, everything is great now meaning everything was always great the whole time and anyone who complained earlier this season was a fickle impatient idiot with no long term view. That's right isn't it?

That Frankie and Benny's is going to be effing brilliant when it opens.

Absolutely nuts that people still believe this rubbish. He's got an agent, he knows about money, he's heard of the Champions League, he would have his own ambition that he has managed to formulate himself as a fully grown adult. People think humble little Saints players joining up with the England squad is something like Crocodile Dundee being shown around New York City for the first time. Mental.

The south coast is still theirs, right?

So what you're all saying is we were wrong to sack Pellegrino?

Not really. I despise him because he has created a Labour party that could never get elected by populating it with cranks and loons in all positions of influence. He couldn't run the machinery of the party, had no empathy with the public, couldn't appeal beyond his activist base. And every element of the party ended up under the control of the cretin and his band of acolytes. The newspapers say hes fu cking useless because he is fu cking useless. It would have been perfectly possible to have a Labour government post-Cameron, and perfectly possible to have squeaked victory in the EU referendum. I hold him hugely responsible for the first not happening and significantly responsible for the second not happening. So spare me the horsesh it about the howwible newspapers and the howwible meeeja. He had no media plan, his team didn't have a clue on how to manage messages, they were absolutely useless at rebuttals when attacked and pathetic at making the political weather and telling stories to persuade the public. All of this was obvious to me the day he got the job, I said so and so it proved. Utterly useless old cu nt turns out to be utterly useless? The newspapers didn't have to lift a finger.

It's really not that odd being that people suggest and recommend we do exactly the same thing with our own young players all the time for years and years and years.

There would have to be a Swansea level of capitulation for us to be relegated now. This run of form has changed everything. We've got 16 games to tot up the ten or twelve points required, whereas the bottom clubs are looking at around double that in the same time. I can't see us ending up as one of the three worst teams in the division now. The bottom four look like the contenders and it might not change much from here. I'm looking up now, not down.