CB Fry

I find the above comments utterly fu cking clueless. I must have missed that mass immigration of people aged 60+ putting all the strain on the NHS. Pretty certain they were here already. Immigration of working age people to, you, know, work isn't the thing putting strain on public services. Only if you believe sh ite in the Daily Mail. Ditto wage stagnation. It's not immigration that has created an economy of high employment in sh it jobs. But immigration hasn't stopped the "high employment" part, funny that. It's almost like they haven't taken anyone's job. But I feel I've already wasted my time typing this out because it's not the story you want to hear and you know, send-em-all-back, its a swarm, it's breaking point, let's take back control and so on and so on. Personally I am looking forward to the day our outward looking forward thinking open for business standing alone Great Britain does a ground breaking trade deal with India, my understanding is we'll wrap that up no bother around Easter next year. And then we'll see another influx of lots more wonderful extra brown people into the country to live and work and do that funny dancing, definitely be a different colour skin and everything. Because you will be supportive of that, won't you?

https://news.sky.com/story/amp/new-brexit-leak-reveals-steep-costs-for-uk-industries-11240583?__twitter_impression=true And now the by-sector analysis. Looking rosy. Every time I see these reports I do share one opinion with the swivel-eyed Brexiteers babbling on about the Osborne-project-fear -never-happened-routine: these numbers have been spun. Forecasts are intrinsically and inevitably wrong - that's what they are. But these numbers have been spun because that's what governments do. They spin. There's magic political dust on these numbers. Remember that. They will have been spun to make them look more optimistic than they actually are. They've been sexed up to actually look that sh it. They've been massaged and filtered to wring out a positive message. The establishment created these numbers. The Prime Minister and DeExEU are leading this work. Just think what those numbers were like before the spinning started. Just think. Still, will of the people, eh?

I've been taken some financial advice and I am currently piling in Pan-Pipes on the futures market. It will be just so refreshing to have the power to choose them rather than the fu cking Flutes and Basoons being forced on us by the bloody Germans.

Jesus wept.

Didn't they "take a bullet" a couple of years back when they finished 10th? Following season: won the league. They've learned their lesson and no mistake.

Why does he look like Jimmy Bullard now?

Couldn't give a flying fu ck. My post was "it feels like". To me. My opinion. Going and play your computer game you tediously pointless dweeb.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/rugby-union/2017/12/28/rugby-now-full-cheating-underhand-tactics-threatening-engulf/ From that article.... We saw another example of that*last week when Worcester beat London Irish. Donncha O’Callaghan yanks on the hair of Saia Fainga’a, the London Irish hooker. Fainga’a gives him an open-handed slap to which O’Callaghan responds like he has been dropped by a Mike Tyson uppercut.* A*few weeks before that, Remi Tales does the same thing*in the Champions Cup for Racing 92*after Ellis Genge makes slight contact with his throat. He rolls*around on the floor until the referee awarded a penalty and then springs up right as rain. The amount of backchat towards referees has also gone through the roof. We have even seen*the start of players waving imaginary cards to the referee. .... What heroes, what gentlemen, what fine figures of men. Not like those howwible howwible football people.

If you don't think any rugby players can be petulant then god help you. The "rugby players are all wonderful gentlemen while footballers are all horrid" argument has been shown up to be total fu cking garbage time and again. Plenty of Rugby players, on all kinds of levels and throughout history have proven to be despicable cheating cu nts. Also, there is barely any debate on the pitch in rugby matches about who kicks goals because typically there is a much clearer designation of the role. It's as clear and defined a role as a goalkeeper in football. So obviously rugby players (What heroes, what saints, what gentlemen) don't debate that on the pitch.

I would think 36 points will be enough this season. It feels like a very low standard down there. Certainly if we continue our point-per-game record for the rest of the season then we'll be fine.

I can imagine rugby players passing blood capsules around to fake injuries in order to cheat during matches. I can imagine that really rather easily.

Liverpool have now conceded more Prem goals at Anfield in the games VVD has played (5) than they did all season before he joined (4). No idea if that is accurate but it's on Twitter and seems effing hilarious to me.

Perfect for us - we just need Liverpool to continue performing to stereotype - beat the big teams, choke versus the others. We need at least a point.

Any club that anyone thinks is bigger than West Ham is "so huge" now? What kind of hold has that club got over you?

He's played in it and been a first team coach in it at a high profile club. He's spent multiple seasons in this country and in the Premier League. He's not fresh off the boat.

What's your answer to the question?

Leicester last trophy: 2016 Everton: 1995 That's your measure from about three posts ago. What's your point?

Clocks most right a day are.

Most clocks are right all day.

I think 10 points will do it. The entire bottom half is dogsh it. 36 points I think will be plenty. All we need to stay up, sack him and hello Brendan in the summer.

Just sack the pri ck anyway.

Jay Rodriguez on so that means goals goals goals.

Okay then. Sure it would be party time on here if that was us.

WBA virtually down if they lose, so let's see what the pressure does to them.

Good point. I have reported this post.