CB Fry

He's not a popularist left winger, he's a total non entity and won't be popular with the public. At best he's a shi t ter version of Ed Milliband. And yeah, your Bullingdon millionaire etc etc Boris would annihilate him in the 2020 election. Annihilate him on the votes of normal people.

Sensible stuff.

Three landslide election victories with majorities Cameron has got nowhere near. Some death. Prior to that, not one, not two, not three but four consecutive election defeats. Some roots. There's plenty of room for a centre right social democratic party capable of winning elections.

We signed Clasie last week.

Is it just me that finds the title of this thread REALLY ANNOYING?

Always nice to see you maintaining your considerably high standards of writing utter drivel on this forum.

I look on the main forum less than once a month for several years now, I just use Tapatalk. Does the job. The only downside is that I don't get to form an opinion of what goes or doesn't go on the banner.

They'll get somewhere else all right. A generation in increasingly irrelevant opposition. A Corbyn led Labour would get annihilated beyond belief by a Boris led Tory party. They'd get annihilated by a IDS-led Tory party to be honest.

Tell you what. I'll continue posting whatever I like wherever I like on this forum.

The fact that you are patting yourself on the back for that post demonstrates very clearly which one of us is out of our depth. Let's be clear, and it is something I have said several times now, I am not entering a debate with you. I've read enough of your drivel to not bother.

Mid-table league finish and a cup final and he's England manager this time next year.

As you would say, LOL.

As you would say, LOL.

Maybe make sure they don't eat any seafood or cross any busy roads either. Is there a radiator we can chain them both to for a week or so?

http://news.sky.com/story/1523470/cop-fatally-shoots-unarmed-motorist-in-head Bingo cards at the ready, everyone.

With a few outliers, yer typical league table will have the highest scorers and lowest conceded at the top and the lowest scorers and highest conceders at the bottom. It's boring but score more than the other lit will always do you right.

Hang on, my mistake, getting confused. In that case - him not being available for one friendly because he played in another friendly doesn't seem much to worry about. Koeman might have thought him running around vs no hopers is just what he needs right now.

Edited: cheers.

What is happening on Thursday? Not really keeping up with pre season matches.

That made me smile. He's exactly how you come across on here, grizzling about anyone daring to celebrate the England women's team doing well, droning on about "we fought a war for you youngsters" even though your generation didn't, and lest we forget the hilarity of your EUSSR routine. Country club bore to the bone.

Would you mind highlighting which of the last batch of replies need to be filed in the "reasoned/rational debate" pile. It's so difficult to tell them apart from the ham fisted troll drivel. I like to be able to drink in the posts when you're really trying and your little brain is composing a "reasoned" or "rational" response. I like the idea of you leaning back in your chair and congratulating yourself on how rational you're being. Anyway, a list of post numbers of your rational debate replies each night would be a jolly handy ready reckoner for us. Saves trawling through the reactionary, LOL-strewn barely literate garbage you also post. Because you are desperate to have a reasoned debate here aren't you, yes? Aren't you? So, post numbers please.

Well chuffed I guessed Alex Cherednik and Steve Wood.

I'm enjoying Lord D equating the Falklands War with some grand gesture of freedom. Hats off to the armed forces and the sacrifices they make but trying to apply the "we fought a war for you, son" rhetoric to the bloody Falklands is self righteous garbage. Males a change from his EUSSR routine, though.

Wow, what a change. What progress. Now, he done a "considered" response he have. And jolly proud of what he's done, too. And quite rightly. Well done you. Well done. Brace yourself, here it is: Hang on everyone, he done a "meaningful" response too.... In case you missed it. It's pretty meaningful, I've got to say. But this is my favourite post. So sweet, bless him.

Your rational debate stuff is going so well. You were just so right when you told us all that's what you wanted to have. The level of rational-ness in your posting has gone through the roof. Well done. What I like about you now is you've really taken to debating the issues, like a changed man. By no means are you just ham-fistedly typing in whatever infantile drivel enters your head in order to get some reaction and avoid engaging with any discussion point with anyone. Let's see how it's all going. 1. Simple abuse. 2% rational. 2. Have a little pop at the UK, for the 347th time on this forum, using the same "small country" line as several times previously. 3% rational. 3. Basic wasteof typing. 1%: 4. Flailing about gibberish ranting desperate for attention, 0.5%: 5. More flailing about gibberish. 2%. I think it is the LOLing at the end of each post that elevate your arguments to the level of high level rational-ness.