CB Fry

I have no idea what point you're trying to make.

Yep, thought you were going down that route. As soon as anyone driven by left wing ideology does anything bad, they're not left wing anymore. It's almost like China and the USSR just accidentally fell into totalitarianism. Your last sentence brings you right back on form, another pointless question. People on the left of the Labour party were complaining about Blair when he was winning three consecutive thumping majorities so what is happening now is business as usual. Its cute you seem to genuinely think this Corbyn thing represents a something new. He's just a rent-a-leftie doing his little turn for one fringe of the party. He'll scuttle off back to obscurity come September and that's that.

Listen up you forum ham and eggers. My friend Saint Nacho sees the worries on the faces of Southampton fans. He sees sadness but also hope for the season ahead, for new horizons to come. Saint Nacho shares your fears. Saint Nacho shares your hopes. Saint Nacho likes to see a new fellow Hispanic player in the squad, what with him definitely being Mexican and stuff. He done a new song and everything.

He lived almost his entire life as a key member of the communist party, that's what he did.

That's right. The sum total of the national economic benefit of subsidised childcare is that it will cover the cost of subsidised childcare. Not a penny more. This thinking is nearly as feeble as your EUSSR routine. Keep it up.

You could simply ignore the thread. It's pretty easy to ignore things you know.

I think we can all see who the person who "doesn't know much about history" is here. As I hinted at before, you're a decent attempt at a troll character on here but it's all a bit over-done. Stop trying so hard.

We will walk this group.

Yeah, he was, like, such a fatcherite and stuff.

....and every fifty or so posts some sap comes on here making out they have a higher understanding of this thread than the rest of us.

Why do you keep lecturing me about right wing thinking, then?

You don't really read what people post, do you sweetheart?

I'm starting to think you are sound kind of automated phrase generator. Just a random collection of non sequiturs adding up to nowt in particular. Keep it coming. Forum legend status awaits you.

He's the MP for that famous Tory stronghold, err, Islington.

Basically a paper/symbolic excersize, then? As you admit he won't win anyway, so when he doesn't the party will (I hope) pursue a sensible centre left social democratic agenda, presented in such a way that we actually get to see it in government. That's what I want to see and actually changing people's lives, like sure start, like the minimum wage and the investment in schools and hospital infrastructure amongst countless other things that Labour while did in power, that the hollow - headed sneeringly dismiss as Tory. You strike me as someone who wants to complain and campaign but from the comfort blanket of pressure group opposition. It suits you to have the Tories in power, and I have no doubt you'll be grizzling about "betrayal" within about five weeks of a Labour administration taking office. Corbyn will disappear off down the rabbit hole of cosy opposition, be that to conservatism or to the "they're all Tories" kneejerk horsesh it we get towards anyone with an eye for pragmatic social democracy. For the rest of us, let's hope someone comes forward to truly take on and beat the Tories. That's what I want. Changing the country for the better with Labour leading us into the 2020s.

I apologise. It definitely won't happen again.

If the forum was "politically neutral" then surely Hockey would have banned himself?

Unfortunately Alpine has already thoroughly analysed the squad numbers and concluded we won't be signing anyone. No space apparently.

You seem to have zero understanding of political discourse whatsoever. It's not difficult to find some people supporting a left wing politician, especially within the Labour party. The fact you have taken this five minute wonder as the start of some "populist" movement is effing hilarious. Look, an article in the Guardian says so. Gosh. Corbyn is a total non-entity, who when it comes to it is very unlikely to win anyway, at which point he can slink back to his Fabian Society newsletters and irrelevance. Anyway I am thoroughly enjoying your feeble bedsit political analysis, not just flirting with cliché but balls out ****ging it. If you could start calling the rest of us "crypto-fascists" that would really finish the look.

You're fast becoming one of my favourite contributors to the forum. Pretty breathtaking stuff you seem able to come out with.

You really couldn't have less of a clue, could you?

Well you've managed to ramble around making no coherent point too. Seriously, well done. 1. Corbyn is not and will not ever be popular with large swathes of the country. Walk down any high street in the land with his photo and see how many people even know who he is. I'd wager less than one in twenty. 2. Point me in the direction of any post by me, on any thread on this forum that suggests that I think "think everything is great and we're having such a wonderful time with this government". I've been a Labour voter for twenty odd years of voting. I don't want a total non entity like Corbyn leading that party because I want to see progressive social democracy in government, not a Labour party as glorified pressure group. That's closer to what "large swathes of the country" want.

You seem to be rambling around covering various vaguely connected themes but not really making any coherent point. Corbyn would be a disaster for Labour, and by extension the country as he'd be handing an unbroken decade of rule for the Tories on a silver platter. But yeah, kid yourself he's a "populist".

What part of "best team when everyone is fit" did you miss?

You got called a racist for posts like this: Keep it rational, now.