aintforever

I am aware that there are nasty little mouse like things called rats, and that they are killed as vermin. However it doesn't mean that it's right to kill animals for the fun of it. It's the killing for enjoyment I have issue with not the method of killing. Foxes should be controlled when they are being a pest in the most humane way possible, not ripped apart by dogs because it's something "fun" to do on a bank holiday.

I think is someone goes around killing rats for a laff they are also a c*nt.

Hunting is the exercise of power over a vulnerable prey. This is the source of pleasure it provides for those whose own lives and self-image are inadequate. Shooting should be used where needed for the purpose of control. It should never be done just for the pleasure in killing.

They both kill animals for fun, no difference in my view, except one is frowned upon because it is done by chavs. It shows a lack of intelligence if you enjoy killing animals for fun IMO.

I think we cashed it in and ended up with Forecast. Had no choice because we were skint.

Do you agree with dog fighting as well then?

I don't deny that, just think killing animals for fun is for c*nts.

Only the retarded resident nazi could interpret those graphs as falling temperatures.

What a surpise, our resident climate change denying nazi enjoys killing cute fluffy animals as well.

Target has to be champions but there shouldn't be any toys thrown out the pram if promotion isn't achieved this year. Adkins obviously has the ability to get teams promoted, it would be wise to give him time to build a team.

If anyone thinks what Boyle said about Afganistan makes him racist then they are thick. He was using strong language to highlight racism, there's a big difference. The show wasn't that funny but all this hysteria is nonsense. You can bet your life more people are going to watch the next show when all the saddos tune in just so they can get outraged at how offended they are - stupid ****s.

Don't watch it then, it's not a problem.

They go anywhere near a NATO nation and the USA will rip them a new ass hole. I don't know why anyone is concerned about Russia, it's just paranoia, they have no motivation for another Cold War.

Agree with Delldays, he totally deserves it. I don't know what you have to do to become a knight, but I think in modern day Britain, being a legend in the national sport, banging a spice girl and doing **** loads of charity work more than qualifies. Steve Redgrave was only good at a sport no one gives a **** about.

I don't see what Russia has got do with us.

He was excellent on Mock the Week but the new show is not as funny. The stand up is OK but the sketches are crap. I think his comedy works well on Mock the Week because it is broken up with more light hearted humour from the other comedians, when it is just Boyle it gets a bit much. I wish people would stop moaning about him though, if you don't like his humour **** off and watch something else.

Pinnacle paid them money so the administrator could sit on his fat arse earning shed loads more like. If the administrator sold the club to Liebherr a few months earlier it wouldn't have needed to be kept on a life support machine whilst Pinnacle dicked about.

He is right about the fixture pile up maybe working to our advantage as not many teams have our resources. If I was Nicola I would throw the chequebook at it, get a second eleven as strong as the first and we will rip this league a new ass hole when injuries and suspensions kick in.

Your solar rays theory doesn't seem to impress these guys, who use data collected by NASA. The quote below seems to indicate they might know what they are talking about. All your quotes are theories of how solar rays cause clouds which could effect temperature - that is already known. You don't show any measurements or data that conclusively show that solar rays have increased, clouds have increased and thet correlates to the temperature variations. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-11480916 "So we might have the ultimate paradox that in a globally warming world we'd have cold winters in Europe. But it would be an awful lot warmer in Greenland," he said. Professor John Shepherd, who studies climatic change at the National Oceanography Centre in Southampton, added: "The observations do show that solar radiation does some peculiar and interesting things, which will hopefully be revealed through future research. "As with all other known solar effects since measurements began, these effects are subtle and tiny - certainly nowhere near enough to explain any of the climate changes that we observe."

Where is the evidence for high energy particle streams causing changes in climate. It would be great if true.

I don't think scientists KNOW what change will do on any level, that's why billions is being spent on satellites that measure the thickness of ice and distribution of water around the globe. The effects are potentially catastrophic, but the UK could end up having some positive effects.

If the coalition fails Labour would romp it at the next election IMO, even though they picked the wrong brother he is still a million miles more electable than Gordon Brown. Plus they will have got the Iraq War monkey of their back.

You already are, just like you are hearing all sides to the 'smoking might cause cancer' and "the earth might be round' debate. There is every motivation in the world for scientists to disprove the man made climate change theory. If someone could find conclusive proof that it's not man made they would save the world billions, win a nobel prize and make themselves very very rich.

For someone who enjoys shooting holes in other people's theories you amazing fail to see gaping holes in your own. If climate change is some big socialist conspiracy how come all of the World's major countries have signed up to it? And your very own conservative government are about to blow £27billion on thousands of massive off shore windmills, which if what you say is true, would be the same as taking £27billion and setting fire to it. If it's supposed to be the scientists conning everyone you are assuming all the Worlds top scientific bodies are run by evil, lying socialists. Now we all know the most intelligent people are generally left wing but I think you are pushing the theory a bit far there! It appear to me that the only people refusing to accept what is quite obvious are people like you who value money and greed so much they are prepared to ruin the planet over it.

You make it sound like the opening games were a complete disaster, we played Plymouth of the park in the first half of that game and were unlucky to lose, the only other game we lost was against Premier League Bolton, even that wasn't a bad performance. We beat Bournemouth 2-0 and Bristol Rovers 4-0 away, the only shocking performance was the Orient draw. None of those opening games were close to how bad the 2-0 loss to Brentford was with Adkins' 'fit' side.