aintforever

If the terms were reasonable why hasn't some other building company taken over - there are plenty of builders looking for work.

Some crimes though there is no doubt at all. It's when this is the case, and it's the most severe type of murder then the death penalty should be used.

I think he'll be off in January, might have a chance of keeping him here if we are looking odds on for promotion though.

True, still no need to have a dig at them though.

What, a League 2 club trying to make money! Dirty, money grabbing ****s

I think the pricing is spot on. Just think the dig at Shrewsbury is a bit pathetic.

You don't think it's hypocritical of a club owned by billionares, which has one of the highest ticket prices in the league, and introduced a booking fee and parking charges having a pop at Shrewsbury for trying to make money?

The Lampit thing makes sense now, get a respected FA person to take charge just to get the golden share, then one that's sorted put the Israeli property developer in control.

How much do these sites charge for buying and selling?

Glad it's cheap but the "lining their pockets" comment is a bit unnecessary. Not every club is owned by one of Europe's richest families, the FA Cup is the one chance for smaller teams to earn some decent money.

There's too many reasons to bother explaining every one. Most important reason is that the minute SFC knew they were trading insolvently they went into admin, and did everything by the book. AND we've been punished. -9 when you were already down is not a punishment.

I knew the average Skate was a bit thick but this PFC123 guy takes the ****. You need to be seriously retarded to think what happened at SFC is the same as pompey.

How could they possibly borrow more money, there is nothing left to secure anything on?

I would say I'm more left wing than right, I certainly would never vote Tory. There is obviously no evidence either way about the BBC's bias as it's subjective. It's just an impression I get from watching it and reading the website, any story that helps the left wing agenda seems to be covered with particular vigor.

It did improve when Lambert went off, I think Barnard's extra movement helps the team. I would drop him for the next game.

The BBC definitely have a left wing bias, that is pretty obvious. I suppose in this case they are directly effected by government cuts so are bound to be against them.

So that's the end of this thread then. The cheats have got away with it scot free. Sends a clear message to every club in the Championship - you might as well gamble on promotion and get your self 100million pound in debt - the very worst that could happen is you end up back where you were.

I think that's more to do with us being ****.

I don't have a problem with what Rooney earns, there's shed loads of money in football today, it's only right the players get the lion's share. I think Man Utd have made a mistake giving him so much though, I think he's already peaked. He's only 24 and he's got the body mass index of a pot bellied pig, god knws what he will look like when he gets past 25 and fills out.

They wont go bust, they are just trying to get away with not paying Gaydamak so they can go on another spending spree. Cheating ****s.

I don't buy that, the Chanrai sueing Gaydamak thing happened before Chanrai got involved in PFC. Why would Chanrai get involved with or put himself in a situation where he can be shafted by Gaydamak again? It doesn't make sense. Gaydamak and Chanrai are working together IMO.

I don't buy that, the Chanrai sueing Gaydamak thing happened before Chanrai got involved in PFC. Why would Chanrai get involved with or put himself in a situation where he can be shafted by Gaydamak again? It doesn't make sense. Gaydamak and Chanrai are working together IMO.

There's also the possibility that Gaydamak and Chanrai are both in this together for the same end and all this "Gaydamak's demands" stuff is just a convenient way of blaming the closure on someone a thousand miles away. I don't buy the way Chanrai 'accidently' ended up owning the club for one minute.

There's also the possibility that Gaydamak and Chanrai are both in this together for the same end and all this "Gaydamak's demands" stuff is just a convenient way of blaming the closure on someone a thousand miles away. I don't buy the way Chanrai 'accidently' ended up owning the club for one minute.

Won't happen, it's just threats to make Gaydamack to lower his demands - he will get nothing if it folds.