sotonjoe

Is he really further down the Forest pecking order than David McGoldrick are are they just short of cash?

Which gym? Hopefully not mine.

The file is called Susanna Reid Fakes

Why don't you use one of your many girlfriends?

I think he just realised that he's up to doing the job himself.

I still can't empathise with this idea that the business (club) owe its customers (fans) an installment plan. Some people clearly have the notions of rights and privileges rather confused.

Where's Stu when you need him?

I think SRS should make his donation using one of those big fat comedy cheques and take a piccy to post on here.

hahahahahahahaha Now the next lol moment will be when SRS quietly lets slip that he has actually purchased one himself after a good month flogging gym memberships.

Because you don't have a BA in Marketing from Paisley University.

I just kicked VM into touch as they've over loaded my local network leaving my 20mb service only getting 10-12mb in the evenings. Well, speedtest claims it's that fast but I'm unconvinced. I'm bored with the TV and crappy home phone service on which 1471 has never worked properly and I can't have a free caller display service. So back to BT and gone for O2 broadband. O2 were offering three months free and £50 cashback through quidco so that's very cheap for 12 months.

http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/newshome/Nugent39s-car-vandalised.6425286.jp Worth a giggle.

I used to sell this stuff. There are so many cowboy companies out there in the 'industry' that it's unbelievable. I'd be very wary of paying anybody for this sort of service.

I got mine on the T-Mobile £15 a month for 18months. The upfront charge was £89. That too has 100 mins and 100 text, but you obviously get your choice of booster so I've got unlimited texts. As you know they obviously pulled all those contracts once they saw what their competitors were able to offer!

That seems rather one sided. On the other hand, she could be a troublesome employee who has gone one step too far by making critical (unprofessional?) remarks in the public domain (yes, Facebook and the internet IS the public domain), and has been suspended pending her permanent departure in order to avoid things escalating any further. The suspension may well be the best thing for all parties involved.

In a straight head to head it has to be the Desire. It's the iphone and then some, although as some have said the android market isn't quite up there with the appstore yet. It's growing though and all the apps you NEED are there. The fact that it only comes on £30+ a month contracts is a bit of a pain as it takes a bit of the value out of it. I'm running two of the buggers for £30 a month as I got in there early on release.

I guess they will send them out in installments.

that's not true at all as far as the Desire is concerned. I suspect you're referring to the old Heor etc.

had to pmsl when doing a side by side of the iphone 4 and the htc desire only to find that the desire still has a clearer, crisper and brighter screen through the menu system. People paying ihpone prices are NUTS

Fair enough if they don't want to offer season ticket holders reduced prices but why oh why can't we claim or 'own' seats. That always used to be part of the deal. You get your seat for the league games and the chance to claim it for the cup games. Starting to feel a little bit more aggrieved with each decision Saints make at the moment.

I think the shaking of a fence fits the description of the law you have posted very well. The law has been carefully worded and suggests that violent disorder can be any act which, if performed within a certain context, could cause somebody fear. It also clearly states that the reasonable person who might be scared can be hypothetical; in other words, they don't actually need to be there. This negates those claims which say this was an unfair sentence because there was "nobody there", or "they weren't shaking a fence" at anybody. That is an irrelevent facor when trying somebody for violent disorder. The police have clearly utilised the law to its potential here, even if they haven't actually handed out the maximum sentence. Now, debate the rights and wrongs of the violent disorder law if you will, but I don't think there's much to be said when it comes to debating whether or not this behaviour constituted violent disorder. It seems to fit your description very nicely indeed.

Details seem rather late on this to be honest. Last year we began preseason on the Saturday 4th July (not quite sure of date - 3rd / 4th? - it was the first weekend in July anyway) at Eastleigh. It was a hot 3pm kickoff if I remember correctly and rumours were rife about the 'Swiss takeover' which was then finally announced the following Monday. Bring that forward 12 months and you'd be lookg at a first preseason game NEXT SATURDAY. That clearly isn't going to happen now. Perhaps we started preseason early last year, but it still feels odd to have details of so few friendlies at this stage. If we do't hear details during next week, I'm going to think it's very strange,

I love this sort of discussion. What you essentially have is a group of guys who can't afford a BMW, trying to justfiy their choice of cheaper. Take money out of the equation and all you Seat lovers would have a BMW in a moment. Next you'll all be saying you shop in Lidl because they make nicer ready meals than Marks and Spencer.

Our loss? We were in for another manager then?

That'll give all those plastic fans citing the lack of installment plan as a reason for giving up their season tickets an excuse not go to the first game then.