Nolan

It would take 8 years to adequately train up and set up a replacement wing construction facility for Airbus. Their release was purely EU propaganda

If we can't get a contract agreed, then let's make a profit...

What a quite fantastic dramatisation of actual events. Awards have been won for less.

Though the way they express it is in a way I wouldn't choose to. In a free market economy companies are able to do the business where they want. Its for the government to create the systems to have the people in situation in our country for the best companies to employ.

Armstrong's last season for Celtic = Van Dijk's first half of the season for us. Heart wasn't in it. At that fee he looks to be a bargain.

I notice it is only remainers insisting on trying to imply the "extremist" nature on the people who voted for Brexit. It says more about you than it does about us who chose to vote to Leave the EU.

https://www.jacklopresti.com/news/my-statement-regarding-airbus "Yesterday, I had a meeting at the Airbus offices at Filton,*with their Senior Vice President Katherine Bennett, with other Senior Airbus managers,*and with Richard Harrington MP, the Minister for Business and Industry. Other Aerospace companies such as GKN and Rolls Royce were also present.* Airbus, who made a profit reported to be approaching £4bn last year, were requesting further taxpayer funded support from Government.*They have also invited the Prime Minister*to open their new ‘Wing of the Future’ facility in Filton. At no point was Brexit mentioned by Airbus. Airbus seem to be in a state of confusion about their position. One could be forgiven for thinking that some EU member state governments were using Airbus to try and influence the UK Government into giving them what they want in any future Brexit deal. Airbus have used these heavy handed tactics before. They threatened to leave the UK if we didn’t join the Euro, which, thank goodness, we didn’t. During the Referendum they tried to interfere in the democratic process by writing letters to their employees instructing them how to vote. In recent months, they have tried to interfere in what was a perfectly legal and legitimate take-over bid by Melrose for GKN, saying:*“It would be ‘practically*impossible’ to give new work to the Aerospace and Automotive Energy Group should the turnaround specialist take it over." This was another ridiculous empty threat from Airbus. Yesterday, there were GKN representatives around the boardroom table. We also undertook a visit to the GKN Western Approach facility where there was a lot of discussion regarding further investment in our area from both GKN and Airbus, as well as further collaboration between the two companies. This morning I have spoken with*Government colleagues, who have confirmed that we are working closely with companies to understand their concerns ahead of leaving the EU and alongside industry will invest almost £4bn by 2026 to ensure the UK remains a world leader in civil aerospace. On Monday, I will be meeting Greg Clark, the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, to discuss Airbus’ statement. The employment and wellbeing of my constituents as Member of Parliament for Filton and Bradley Stoke will always be my*highest*priority, and I am struggling to believe this sabre rattling from Airbus is helpful or credible".

Here's something else the BBC reported... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-44120525

I read to "consider". Because they can "consider" anything they want.

Does it even matter? I posted numbers for points won when Wilshere had minutes on the pitch and points when he didn't. I didn't give any analysis on the numbers just the numbers.

Those stats include all games he got minutes on the pitch. So the 3-1 loss at man city is one of the 4 losses. He also played a full 90 in the draws with Chelsea and liverpool.

Last season Premier League matches Arsenal with Wilshere P20 W11 D5 L4. 38 points. 1.9 ppg Arsenal without Wilshere P18 W8 D1 L9. 25 points. 1.38 ppg

Made up from the amount of money we paid into the EU in 2016 divided by 52. It's more than that now...

You tone of discourse does you no favours, locksy.

Went bother rebutting made up numbers? They haven't got anything right so far. There is no evidence to say they'll get anything related to Brexit right, now or in the future. I don't blame them. Theyre in the pockets of ardent remain organizations such as Goldman Sachs, but because of that they severely lack credibility.

We don't need someone who can provide assists and score goals?

FT stands for F***ing Tedious when it comes to Brexit.

No. It really isn't. It was always the Gross amount of money we paid to the EU each week.

Like I said earlier... Would Harry Reed say positive things to Maddison about the current Leicester manager?

The "economic hit" is rubbish though isn't it. We either pay £350mil a week or we don't. We could take an "economic hit" if we stayed in the EU. Everything but the £350mil is guesswork.

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/12691/11407972/southampton-and-leicester-agree-james-maddison-fee-with-norwich "One source has told Sky Sports News that Maddison prefers Southampton but he is still to decide which club he will join."

I think its whois Financials you believe. Those who have been wrong in every other step in the last three years who don't believe the "Brexit dividend" will come in. Or those that believe that if you don't give money to the EU you have that money to spend. Soubry and Grieve are lawyers, and set certainly haven't got anything right so far when it comes to how the economy would come to pass after the vote.

Should say Arch Remainer Sarah Woolaston of the Soubry / Grieve clique.

Or maybe Les doesn't have the Same power as he used to now the clubs directorship is more than just him, and there are more directors accountable.

Well if it's the choice between Southampton and Leicester, what can Harry Reed tell Maddison about Puel?