INFLUENCED.COM

Hope, believe its a glitch, form is temporary class is permanent(unless your a keeper)

It is there in the public medium not to promote sales as you would your company or product but to ensure all are aware of their presence at SFC, as you were not aware they clearly have not got their message across to all, its a bolllox statement thats all, no different to the ex directors.

A lad, only just out of short trousers, organised something that got local and national exposure, yet an 'organisation' supposedly for the fans does nothing, this, at a time where they should be able capitalise on our situation by actively getting people to subscribe with disclosure on how, they as a body, will attempt to get those that control our club to act in "the best interest of the club"

Agree but would add "keep" to getting behind the lads. I appreciate Marys family ties to the club and all that has been done by her family historically, however, by her own admission she and others associated to her made a major error when they sided with Wilde initially, imo she demonstrated her naivety and so beleive her time would be better spent sourcing investors who are able to put something on the table for SFC that Lowe et al could not turn down as it would be clear it is the best thing "in the intrest of the club". If she is using this format to make that request I apologise, I just do not believe it to be the case and it will simply be a b!tch fest by all involved.

Is it too much to ask those 'senior' players with starting bonuses to forego the same to assist with our plight, also puts them in the window for their own progress, they are on a decent whack without these add ons

Posession counts for fu(k all if you aint got the end product, so many were poor last night, distinct lack of motivation, a rocket is required simple as

Call it Yin and Yang, I mean, he helped get Boris Johnson in office ffs

Still not someone I would categorise as a 'loser'

I remember a few posters warned against Wilde, GuidedMissile was one that immediatly springs to mind, Lowe warned us all about Wilde does that make him a good judge of character ? which then conflicts wholly with the current position. For me, too much 'blame' is put on fans for the wrongs of the club, our shareholders make the changes and the decisions, if they are influenced by fan opinion then it is they that must carry the can, larger more prominent shareholders failed to carry out due diligence on Wilde and some have cum their guts and said so, others say fu(k all and continued to draw salary/expenses throughout his tenure. There are far more out there in positions of influence that should and could have prevented the financial meltdown(if we can call it that). Fans are Fans and should have little or no responsibility, however, we must ensure our team gets the best support our town can offer, to that end, many are failing as some feel who is in the chair determines the level of support.

Agree, only someone new in the chair will achieve unity........... for a while !!!!!

It is not a genuine question, it is a further pop at another fan thinly disguised as a 'genuine question'

An industrious performance from most, would have taken a point before kick off but feel we should have pushed for the 3 but hey ho

Skacel has to rate as one of the most over hyped Saints players of recent times, rarely saw commitment from him or ability in line with his purchase price Not too impressed by Molyneaux's first show but have no option but to wait and see

Agree, just sad that this is the level of our expectation now, that said, for many years avoiding relegation was 'success'

"No good deed goes unpunished"

Do you also write for the Echo ?

A 'prominent' businessman comes out with what he believes is a way forward without having to back it up, as you are so 'well known' in the community why didn't you use this article to kick start your initiative ? its a nonsense that the Echo seem to let anyone get into print at the moment to talk about our situation, the comments section sums it up "I would put in £1000.....if I had it"

Sensationalism if you ask me, how credible would any threat be ? I would imagine little or no conviction with such a threat, agree it is unpleasant and brings yet more negative exposure to our club, in this instance both he/she/they who made the threat and Wilde should get some perspective.

If I was chairman we'd be at the other end of the table, have bigger crowds and no financial problems See, anyone can say it

I too hope Crouch does not let these chancers capitalise, they will probably see the alledged 6mil, reported to be enough to takeover at SMS, as their route in, fu(k em, I say, they put themselves up as white knights and failed to come good, they should not be allowed to sneak in for a very small percentage of what is alledged they/their consortium were about to invest. Has Merrington who was part of the consortium and championing these guys ever cum his guts about their current position ? (that said, if we are going into admin and these sh1t(unts can keep us out of it then let them do so, shallow I know but hey ho)

My point is its not 'their' its ours irrespective of opinion

Please explain what is considered as 'their lot' ?

"severage" as in harsh ? I think it is wrong to question his salary during his first spell with us, from memory it was VFM for a premiership chairman.

Agree and feel it was a bit of a game between them all, Crouch is aware they will not stump up 2mil each, they are aware Crouch will not stump up 6mil, still... grabbed a headline on the eve of yet another very important match for our club