Gemmel

Hey Dan, seems a certain headmaster isnt very happy with your reporting, judging by a letter i'm reading

Poisoned chalice. It will be very interesting to see who does take it, but they will be a dead man walking the moment they park their car in the old trafford car park

Serious question (And it's not loaded) What would you be advising Adam if you were his Dad? Ive raved about him, pretty much since the first game i saw him in and the lad is destined for an England cap and one of the big teams (I'm certain) So let's say in January a half way house comes along, say an Everton or Fulham or a Spurs comes knocking. Ive no idea what sort of money he is on now, but given his age, he would be looking at a four year contract at say 30k a week - He's made for life. If a Dad can advise his son on something that sets him up for life (Like Theo) As much as I love Saints, it would be very hard to advise on anything but a move. I hope I am wrong, I love watching him for Saints, but not sure your good family analogy is the right one.

They really couldn't ............could they ????? :smt060:smt060:smt060

I'm confused, You speak about people that saved the club and then refuse to acknowledge Leon's part in that. Whatever Saints fans thoughts on Crouch are, I can't get my head around the fact, he put his money in (When no one else was around) and that money effectively saved us from going out of business. Whatever peoples thoughts on him are, the reality is we owe him a huge thank you.

Called a ladies drink these days

Indeed. Thank you Mr Crouch.

Whilst I agree with a lot of what you say, I still think we probably have the largest wage bill in the division....money is still talking

Hart must stay at all costs

Ironic was the first word that came to mind when you quoted a thread thread talking about multiple log ins

Im guessing you still have a cherry of your own

One thing you have forgotten to mention is that Le Tiss was never charged or even spoken to by the police. (Which is the normal course of events), so with the exception of his own admission, he hasn't been accused of anything by the police. However given your sense of public duty and thirst for justice, the link below provides some 12,000 pages on the subject, which I trust you will read thoroughly before posting again on the matter. http://www.cps.gov.uk/publications/code_for_crown_prosecutors/codetest.html

Spot on

:confused:

Us :confused: (1st minute)

"Nice to see some good news at last. Maybe, just maybe, a 32000 seater is all that we need at the moment." NO SH!T SHERLOCK Quote above from the comments part of the portsmouth link

1986 Saints vs Liverpool at Whitehart lane First away game I was allowed to and only if we went on the offical travel coach.... Memories of the day Ian Rush broke my heart Mark Wrights broken leg Grid lock traffic on what must have been the M25 and fans running on to other coaches fighting. Stupid BBC cameraman who zoomed in on me smoking (Sorry Mum)

I think you find that the mods had to edit the mis- leading title of that thread, but I can't for the life of me think why.

:)

Your first point was so good,. i didn't want to ruin things and read the second. James is the weak link.

I was away on business last week and an email to a poster who lives there resulted in a top night out. For all the crap that gets posted on here, there are some genuinely top top lads that use this fourm and happy to help any Saints fans

You have tried to ruin another thread..... Id say ignorance is 19c

You raise some very interesting points and the bit about Crouch walking away when Liebherr came in doesn't make sense to me either (As previously posted). Crouch was a good fan long before he was anywhere near the board and I can't belive he has just walked away. You will read on here that he is now assoiciated with Eastleigh ( I don't know if that is true) but at the same time of helping out Saints he was also financially helping out Lymington. The next bit is second hand, so can't vouch for its authenticity, (But friend of a friend and all that bollcks) he wasnt interested in joining the new board and to be fair he had publicy said he had no interest in the Chaimans job again. I do think he saved the club, with his money and genuinely don't understand the bad press he gets. If money was given with terms and conditions, for me it changes nothing and quite frankly unless you were dealing with a drunken lottery winner, then of cause there would have been clauses and I hope he has got his money back. But if it is true that he no longer goes (Which I personally don't believe) then something has happened which the ordinary fans don't know about...... It certainly isn't about not getting a free ticket.

Sorry up and away, but that is total rubbish . ...... I believe a certain director did stay on. It was a condidtion set by Fry and his words were ... rupert lowe was reluctant, but it was the only terms on which we were prepared to take the case on. What you typed was twaddle

Actually lowe does play a part in this. I am certainly not sticking up for Fry as I do think he fooked up, but Fry only agreed to take SLH on, if lowe and the other execs resigned. As Alpine pointed out, this was hugely important on many levels, not least Crouch's funding that got us through the worst bits...... Do you really think he would have done that if lowe and his train were still there