I was on the receiving end of many more stories of failings in the NHS when Labour were in power. I'm not saying everything is perfect in the NHS under the Tories, far from it, but to paint a picture of 'NHS = bad' under the Tories and 'NHS = good' under Non- Tories is simply wrong, in my experience.
The NHS achieved record satisfaction levels last year. Damn those nasty NHS trashing Tories....
Will do. My wife and sister-in-law work in the NHS so I'll consult them over the weekend. Can't think why they haven't mentioned its all going tits up before now though. Must have skipped their mind....
Indeed. Or, put another way...
37% of the Scottish electorate voted for separation last year whereas 35% of the electorate voted for the SNP last night.
And yet the media will continue to hold up the SNP as representing the views of the majority of Scotland when, in fact, its roughly a third.
Tories comfortably hold Labour target seat Swindon North. Crucially, the result is in line with the exit poll prediction.
Swindon North result:
CONS: 50.3% (+5.7)
LAB: 27.8% (-2.7)
UKIP: 15.4% (+11.7)
LD: 3.3% (-14.0)
GRN: 3.3% (+2.3)
Opinion polls leading up to the election predicted a 3% - 4% swing to Labour in this seat, but instead its a 5% swing to the Tories....
Or....Trousers will keep an open mind on whether its an issue with policy or implementation/interpretation of policy because the "facts" aren't conclusive
The guidelines do appear somewhat woolly and/or poorly worded: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/416930/dwpf15-0315.pdf
I can't find a definitive list of what is considered to be a "good reason". Surely there needs to be fixed and clear criteria rather than it being left open to interpretation. Being too ill to attend a meeting surely counts as a "good reason"?
Sounds like another case of a common sense policy poorly implemented to me.