Matthew Le God

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/58239578 😉😇 (Yes I know you mean in a league game, but you made it too easy)

We beat Leicester a few months after the 9-0 and that didn't stop commentators!

No it isn't. My question was in regard to him question playing two central holding midfielders and two attacking midfielders. "Just feel we are light in midfield again. 2 proper midfielders and 2 wingers."

What do you suggest as an alternative? 🤔

So the Redmond we've seen all season?

Do you formulate your rebuttals with crayons?

None of them!

No Premier League team has ever stayed up without winning in their first 14 games.

What is the point of such hypotheticals? That can be flipped to what would you say if Saints won?

The available managers list is considerably bigger than the two of Lampard and Allardyce. Why have you limited it to just them?

No

That is not how the rule works either! 🙄

The current scoreline is not an answer to the question I asked.

That isn't how handball works. The ball hitting someone's right is not automatically handball.

No, but we have in a few other games.

If anything it is more defensive than using the 442/4222 formation, as it has one less attacking player!

I was merely asking him why he held that opinion given the evidence to the contrary which shows we aren't remotely a long ball team.

Isn't this a forum... for discussion? All I did was ask for what he meant by it.

What about it don't you understand?

Why do you think that? It isn't how Saints play regardless of formation.

We've used it already on multiple occasions this season during games.

Back from injury, having missed the last 2 months...