Jump to content

Matthew Le God

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    31,623
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Matthew Le God

  1. Isn't this a stonewall?
  2. Matthew Le God

    Russia

    I'd guess the trigger was Truss saying she was fine with British nationals travelling to Ukraine to fight Russians.
  3. Every Premier League Friday night game (whoever is playing) is automatically put last on Match of the Day on a Saturday. They always prioritise the Saturday games as they feel there has been enough time for people to have seen highlights of the Friday game. It is not an anti Saints thing.
  4. The World Cup is in November and December, not the summer. Trippier has plenty of time to recover before the World Cup.
  5. We don't want Europe this season... because it would stop us getting Europe in the future? That is a daft argument. It wouldn't cause us to be relegated.
  6. Matthew Le God

    Russia

    Ukraine sign an agreement with Russia that they will demilitarise and never join NATO, Russian troops leave and then Ukraine rips up the agreement and joins NATO. If Russia can lie and double cross... so can Ukraine!
  7. Winning the FA Cup gets you into Europe, the revenue from a season in Europe + FA Cup prize and gate money would be significantly more than rising a couple of places higher in the league. I think we can go full strength both tonight and Wednesday, it is West Ham who play on Sunday who may need to rotate, not us.
  8. Matthew Le God

    Russia

    Pigeon post
  9. Matthew Le God

    Russia

    That article does not prove it at all. Nowhere in that article does it say the UK economy would collapse if one cable was cut, like was claimed in the earlier tweet.
  10. Answer can be found in this interview... https://amp.theguardian.com/football/2019/jul/17/che-adams-interview-southampton-non-league-thurnby-lodge
  11. Matthew Le God

    Russia

    When they signed up to NATO it was on the understanding they'd follow through with article 5. The whole purpose of signing up to NATO is for mutual self defence. If they aren't providing that then why are they still members?
  12. Matthew Le God

    Russia

    Significant difference between defending a Nato member vs a non Nato member. Nato members have an obligation to defend Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia etc, they don't for Ukraine.
  13. Manage Saints under new ownership!
  14. Matthew Le God

    Russia

    Have there been sanctions put on Belarus? Allowng an invasion to be staged and then take place through your territory shouldn't go unpunished. Plus their president has today said they may contribute with forces later on.
  15. Yet another sellout...
  16. Matthew Le God

    Russia

    Putin's claim that he wants the denazification of the leadership of Ukraine is a strange one. Especially as President Zelensky is Jewish!
  17. Matthew Le God

    Russia

    No I didn't. Why are you making up things I did not say?
  18. Matthew Le God

    Russia

    Why would countries stay in Nato if it didn't act on the key purpose of mutual self defence? There is no point in article 5 if it isn't used in a scenario when it should be.
  19. Matthew Le God

    Russia

    That didn't answer my question.
  20. Matthew Le God

    Russia

    Do you think Nato would then disband?
  21. Matthew Le God

    Russia

    Nonsense, I said Finland should be worried more than the Baltics and Poland. I didn't say the Baltics and Poland shouldn't be worried. However you cut that out of the quote!
  22. Matthew Le God

    Russia

    Do you agree that article 5 is fundamental to the existence of Nato and a key reason why countries signed up to it? Without it being triggered after an attack on one of its members it may as well fold as mutual self defence is the key purpose of it.
×
×
  • Create New...