Matthew Le God

A gnostic atheist would make that claim. But gnostic atheism is a sub set and shouldn't be applied to all atheists.

Why is that funny?

Clearly a typing mistake.

I agree, babies don't believe in anything. Non belief in a god = atheist. So babies are atheist. You still have not grasped that being an atheist does not automatically mean you claim knowledge there are no gods. I really don't know how I can break this down any simpler for you. You and @egg aren't grasping the basics. Do you agree that... knowledge is a subset of belief. You can be an... 1) agnostic atheist 2) gnostic atheist 3) agnostic theist 4) gnostic theist ???

I don't know, but when indoctrination/brainwashing starts is irrelevant to babies being born atheist. Faith is the excuse people make for believing in something without evidence. If you had good evidence... you wouldn't need faith.

Agnosticism deals with knowledge... not belief. It is not a third option when discussing belief. Knowledge is a subset of belief. You can be a... 1) agnostic atheist 2) gnostic atheist 3) agnostic theist 4) gnostic theist Both you and @Turkish haven't grasped this. Belief in god is binary, you either believe or you don't believe. Atheism is not the claim there are no gods. If you don't believe in a god then you are an atheist. So babies are atheist.

Try answering the question 🙄

You haven't grasped the basic definitions of the key terms.

When it comes to the question... 'Do you believe in a god' what do you think the options are?

Why is it laughable?

When it comes to the question... 'Do you believe in a god' what do you think the options are?

You are still unable to grasp the basics of what an atheist and theist is. Atheist = not believing in a god. It doesn't require a choose to be made. There are two option... 1) You belief in a god or gods 2) You don't believe in a god or gods There is no 3rd option. So yes, you are ignorant of the basics of this discussion.

Which makes all babies atheist. Not believing in a god = atheist. You are bringing 'disbelief' into it when that is irrelevant.

My previous answer to Turkish one post up explains.

This post just further highlights your ignorance on this topic. Theism and atheism is a binary choice of belief in a god, there is no 3rd option! You either believe in a god (theist) or you do not believe in a god (atheist). Every baby there has ever been does not believe in a god so is an atheist. Agnosticism deals with knowledge... not belief. It is not a third option when it comes to belief. Agnosticism is a subset of both atheism and theism.

Atheist = not holding a belief in god Babies do not have a belief in God = every baby there has ever been is/was an atheist The indoctrination and brainwashing happens when children are older.

Cameraperson #StayWoke

Like every other person on the planet you were born an atheist. Babies are not Christian, Muslim etc as the indoctrination and brainwashing happens later in life. How have you determined it to be impossible for you to become an atheist for a second time?

It isn't 'extra', all players are expected to follow fitness programmes over the summer.

1) What problem are you claiming he is an equal part of? 2) Why is it nonsense to think some players in a squad are better than others? Is Danny Ings in the same class of striker as Shane Long? Ings and Ward-Prowse are our best players. 3) On what is that based?

They have not announced an extension to his contract. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/57618624

A cheap solution...

You follow me...

Hard to believe that it is the true reason. Saints kept on smaller players from the same cohort. If they didn't think they'd be big enough for one role, they could find a different role for them. Plus the medical department would have been fully aware they could grow taller after the age of 16 when released.