Matthew Le God

Why did you pick yours? Looks like some important breaking Sky Sports News info so it stands out and everyone knows which thread to avoid for the next hour.

How do you read my mind? 🤔😃

It is updated in the opening post of this thread.

It is in the opening post of the thread.

It does when you compare our wage bill to a lot of European clubs. Saints can blow teams like Frankfurt out of the water for wages.

He has been appalling for the last 2+ years. Stoke struggling in the Championship even dropped him because of numerous gaffes. He is declining like Joe Hart did.

Evolution

Dinosaur

All that does is prove the character of God in the Bible is inept. If he is all knowing then he should know that a daft way to get his message across would be a book which would be copied and translated and differences appear over thousands of years. That is a really stupid way to get your message across. Yet it claims God is not the author of confusion, but a plan to get your message out using an old book that requires translation into many different languages is clearly flawed as the translations from the different versions you use above shows.

I'd prefer not to have a massive wage cut and would either see out my contract or expect Saints to make up the difference.

I'm not here to amuse you

Stephens was not signed aged 26, he signed as a 17 year old.

Why is that funny? Did you expect Danny Ings to show me his monthly payslip? 🙄

The wages on FM are often guesses if it hasn't been stated by a reliable source in the media.

River

It doesn't save their entire wage as they'd need to be subsidised. No club for example would sign Carrillo even at £1p if they had to match or get remotely close to his current wage. Same applies to lots of the others.

I'm not falling for that

They won't be able to say where it says which is parable and which is literal in the Bible... because it doesn't say. So there is no point asking them. Despite what the book claims about God not being the author of confusion... the book is riddled with confusion.

No it isn't. I have answered every question that can be answered. I only answer questions with a question if it is an ill-formed question. The question @Golactico wants you to answer is a question that has an answer. So it is not hypocritical. I think we can add hypocritical to your word list.

Answer a question for once! 🙄 1) Do you agree that if it is up to individuals to decide for themselves which bits are parable and which bits are literal then that is opening up for a disater of people disagreeing which is which? 2) Do you agree that such a book where it is unclear which is which is incompatible with the statement...? 1 Corinthians 14:33 For God is not the author of confusion

@Turkish won't answer it. He doesn't answer questions that show him out to be wrong!

The Bible claims... 1 Corinthians 14:33 For God is not the author of confusion If that is true, then why is it for humans to decide themselves which bits are parable and which are literal? That is how confusion and schisms start! This character God is very inept at getting his message across!