Matthew Le God

But we don't play one up front. Our massive up turn in form has been playing 4222 and has been adopted throughout the club, no reason to change that now even if Ings doesn't play.

10

Adams isn't a replacement as Adams is already a starter.

10% of his wages would be out of reach for League One and League Two clubs.

Regardless of us doing that or not. It doesn't require selling our best players to make the repayments.

Not sure how you've worked that out

Long's stats getting a nuking for the next FM update

Our first team will be back for that.

Only 4 of them are likely to start at the weekend.

Probably because it is a pandemic, they may not even be at the stadium and this game will have a tiny number of viewers with PL games on Sky tonight.

Theatre of Saints...

Yes it will have interest at a high 9% rate added to it. But it doesn't mean we should be selling the star players when there is no rush. If anything if it came to needing the cash there are other players with value you'd sell before the likes of JWP.

Watts was in the squad vs Leicester.

We don't need to sell our star players in 2021 to pay a debt where the first payment of lots of payments is not due until 2025!

This season's away kit does not have a sash. 😉 (The outfield home and 3rd kit do)

Lookman isn't really a striker.

You like my suggestion then? 😇

Because players may not want to hamper their chances of a move. Signing a 4 year contract rather than 5 gives them more flexibility to move on sooner. I have no problem with us being a stepping stone club for very talented young players. It is better to have great players for 2 years and sell, compared to plodding along with players other clubs don't want.

Heading back to Salzburg for attacking talent would be good if (and a big if) at all feasible...

Singing about twisting isn't twisting... it is singing 😋

I did not say you said that. It was showing the context of my original post by quoting the point I was replying to. 🙄

🙄 My post was responding to the claim... "We’ll sell this summer whether Ings wants to leave or not". That is the context of my reply! That is the point my post was responding to, not the twisted version CB Fry and yourself think I was talking about. If he does not want to leave, then he would not sign a contract with another club. A club can't force a player to sign a contract against his will.

1) You continue to take it out of context of what my original post was replying to. It said "We’ll sell this summer whether Ings wants to leave or not". If he does not want to leave, then he would not sign a contract with another club. 2) You final sentence is pathetic and petty.

How do you sell someone who refuses to sign a contract with another club?