VectisSaint

I'm with you basically, this is not about the 10 point deduction. If it is then Pinnacle are complete knobs (and I don't think they are). There is something more, maybe its additional point deductions, maybe its something else. The 10 point deduction and the fact that it was not appealable was there all along, no there is something else occurring here. If it were about the 10 points then logic would say bugger it, we'll start with -10 and still walk this league (especially if there is decent money to invest)

Well Pinnacle are extremely naive then (I don't actually believe this is the case by the way, there is something more going on here). If it was they only needed to have looked back at what happened to Leeds to have realised that this would be the case, and so why leave it until the last minute. All of this crap about legal requirements is missing the point. This is not a criminal law case, or even a commercial law case. These are the rules of a members only club. The members only club can make whatever rules they like as long as they are agreed by the members, and do not require members to act illegally. In this case the FL have every right (however unfair it may seem) to impose rules and demand agreement to those rules before admitting someone (or Saints in this case) as a member. At this moment in time Saints do not have a leg to stand on and no amount of gnashing of teeth will change this fact.

to Preston? I know lots of Londoners go to Old Trafford regularly, but Preston is even further away

Sorry Whitey but this is the whole point. The Football League is a Members Club. They can impose whatever rules they like, and there is nothing you can do about it. You either abide by their rules or you are not a member, simples. If and its a big if, the 10 point deduction is the sticking point then I have to admit that I think Pinnacle have been naive at best. The penalty will not be overturned, unless the FL want it to be. Pinnacle should forget it, get on with the takeover and just get round it by ensuring we win enough games to get promotion. My suspicion is that there is more to this though than the 10 point deduction. I certainly hope so.

The Football League's headquarters are in Preston, so going to London would be completely pointless.

No it didn't, we were in the FA Premier League at the time, nothing to do with the Football League.

Even though the source is probably directly involved and an employee of Sky?

If true we are ****ed, because any other takeover would face the same problem. All Fry can do now is get as much as he can for the assets and liquidate the plc/FC. This could be the end of the line folks.

Not sure I agree with all of that, but I do agree with the sentiment. I think this could all go seriously wrong, and I'm not sure I would lasy the blame only at the door of the FL. It seems to me a dereliction of duty by Fry and Pinnacle not to have had negotiations about this with the FL before today. They must have known that they needed FL approval, so why wait until the last minute? Hopefully my natural pessimism is all it is and all will be well come Monday.

or in the case of buying a football stadium more likely renegotiate the terms with the mortgage company and simply take over the payments.

Yes, you are misisng the fact that the debts that have to be paid are nothing like 30mil. It is not necessary to pay off the mortgage, only for it to be renegotiated, Aviya make more money by keeping the mortgage. The primary debt is the 4.5mill overdraft, there may be others but that is the bottom line. Of course if Pinnacle were to pay off the mortgage that would be grand, but I doubt that is an issue at this point in time.

Jerk

Brian Stanley Unfortunately as he is no longer a sitting MP (since 2005) his expense claims cannot be viewed, they are not redacted, they just are not there which seems wrong to me

Its the Football League, not the FA.

God, how depressing, please let it be KK, and not the Guv'nor.

I think I'll give you that it may have been since 1959 :-), but actually automatic 4 up/4 down between Div 3 and 4 (or level 3/4) was reintroduced in 1989 following 2 seasons (?) when the 21st placed team was not automatically relegated but took place in play-offs with the 4th, 5th and 6th teams from the 4th level). In any case, it was a bloody long time ago

It was new in 1989. One other thing that you may have missed as well, its 3 points for a win nowadays (as a Saints supporter that may be of less relevance than any other team)

Its been like that since yesterday at least, I commented on another thread yesterday afternoon.

Keegan will be fine as long as he has a decent right hand man/assistant manager. The good news is that even if he is successful it is unlikely he would leave us for someone else, since he has been in most of the top jobs already, I think only us and Scunny would tempt him out of managerial retirement.

I was going to say look on the BBC. When did that get updated? Last time I looked we had 0 and were in 17th place

Maybe someone is getting confused with all the stories of us having Matt back, 2+2=5

Well no actually. Its a newspapers job to report the news, thats why they are called what they are. Unfortunately in this day and age, they seem to think its their business to poke around and try to make up stories under the guise of "investigative journalism", what most would refer to as **** stirring.

Actually I can see it happening. I really don't think he would take on any other management job, I'm sure he's finished with top flight stuff, but maybe a whirl with a lower league team that he has connections with where there is not so much pressure - I think only us or Scunny would fit that particular bill. I seriously doubt it will happen, but its not beyond the realms with Matt and Lawrie involved.

1) True, given slow build ups he is very successful 2) True, so am I, do we need cheap? 3) How? he has never managed at this level, not thats necessarily a problem 4) You jest methinks

Zummit tells uz twuz caulkead dialectical Tiz how we speakz so you overners cannot understandz uz.