swannymere

It's too difficult to explain so have a look on the forum i mentioned in my earlier post.

That's what i thought but it's not them apparently.

I'd go with the Skoda, have a look around and see if there are any forum's for them, a 307 is a good alternative.

It can be bloody expensive, we had some friends from Brasil doing a small european tour and they found Paris more expensive than Dublin or London, it is a great city but you do have to hunt around for non-touristy bits.

I'd already checked out Wikipedia and i don't know what that Shadow Thieves reference is on about.

OK music lovers, a fellow poster on another forum has posted this, can anyone help? In my collection of mp3's I have one track that I can't for the life of me remember where I got it, although I must have had it for at least 6 years, and I have absolutely no idea who's performing it. I've had a few knowledgeable friends listen over the years and they have no idea either... so... It's an up-tempo version of Dreams (Stevie Nicks/Fleetwood Mac). It's a female duet and the opening singer sounds a little like Heather Small (M People). The other singer sounds a little like Stevie Nicks but with a Toya Wilcox lisp (or should that be lithp) I am 99.9% certain it's not one of the many Deep Dish versions. Any ideas anyone? Oh, Shazam doesn't recognise it - Unidentified track

What type of car do you want? Hatchback, Saloon, Estate etc. also anything it must or must not have? Remember some cars with low emissions only pay £35 a year in road tax. From personal knowledge i'd steer clear of Citroen, Renault and Peugeot saloons which seem to suffer alot of electrical issues whilst the hatchbacks from the same manufacturer are great, its a little odd. Personally i think your best bet are either a Peugeot 307, Citroen C3 or a Skoda Fabia.

Thanks, i knew somebody more articulate than myself would pop-up.

Possibly, but you're entitled to your opinion. HTH!

I'm not sure how to articulate what i want to say without making that vein throb on your forehead. I do think Human life is valuable but not invaluable, if you actually thought this through that would mean you wouldn't allow anybody to drink alcohol, eat sugary or fatty foods because they pose an even greater threat to human wellbeing. I'm aware i'm being facetious.

Still confused, would you like to explain your train of thought?

At no point did i even mention that i would break the law, i would stick to whatever restrictive limit is imposed and as for the so called experts deciding speed limits it's been proven that speed is not the main reason for accidents, by the AA and the RAC so who are these so called experts you're talking about?

I honestly have never thought of putting a value on it, what do you have in mind?

I must have been watching a different player, all the time he was with Saints he gave it 100% even if his talent wasn't quite all there.

Because they tend to be young ad on the verge of making the first team squad at whatever team they're at and it goes to their head, they think they've made it and stop giving 100%, a couple of loans around the league and a bit of maturity kicks in and they start trying again.

So 62 Million people should have stupidly restrictive driving rules imposed on them to save 100? I don't agree, just because we have a difference of opinion does not make me a ****. People driving like idiots should be punished with the full force of the law but driving at reduced speed limits isn't the answer.

Best news this season, thanks Adam!

Atomic Kitten

As of 30 mins. ago yes.

Who decided that being a good socialist meant living in the city? What about the Tolpuddle Martyrs? Falling short again dune, keep up old chap.

Usual ******** probably but have heard Pimpey are signing Wotton on a free to replace Brown.

If you want to drive then you're going to have to accept that there is potential for someone to be hurt or even killed, wether by accident or speeding. Personally i think that the idea of slowing everything down to crawling pace is ridiculous and that we have to accept a certain number of people will be killed, its not particularly palatable but should every driver suffer to save 100 or so lives a year? What is the acceptable trade off? Does slowing everybody down reduce the perception of risk and actually increase the risk? Should parents take more responsibility for the their children rather than seeking to blame others? Not going to be a popular opinion but it doesn't mean its wrong.

BNP apparently, probably one of Dune's mates.

Scooters are less dangerous than cars, you don't hear of many scooter riders being killed.

Took my Godson to a pre-season friendly at St.Mary's when he was 5, he lasted longer than i did, it was a complete bore-fest! He started taking a real interest after about his 3 game but then he was a in a question-a-minute-mode which didn't bother me but i think his dad was grateful for the tag-team answering. I think the interest is increased when they start school and they get to play every week in PE.