Whitey Grandad

There seems to be a failure of logic around this evening.

So crap that we got promoted, apparently.

It bears repeating.

Yet we got promoted.

Sounds familiar.

Let me put it this way. If he weren't already our player, would we buy him for £40m?

https://www.saintsweb.co.uk/

Hell, yeah!

It is Dibling on a bit.

Two goals against Arsenal in that 'Last game at the Dell'. Not forgotten. Good grief. I've just had a look and that was over 24 years ago. Also I didn't realise that MLT's goal came in the last minute of normal time. Happy Days.

Perhaps I'm old fashioned but I was brought up on the principle that you don't draw attention to yourself.

I don't think any of us are.

What ????? You might have told me this when I was younger.

There you go again. Trust your own eyes. Not some random number generating alorithm.

McCarthy was nothing special in those games.

Wasn't that Ramsdale?

Oh but that's exactly what they are. It's a computer algorithm, and one based one based on very limited input data. The variance in output results is frightening. This is not a case of some team of experts analysing every nuance.

I suspect he's incapable of passing a mirror without stopping.

These are random computer generated numbers. No intelligent thought or interpretation was involved.

In what way was he the "worst keeper at this level"? We finished in the play off positions.

I would if I could remember 😔

I've done a couple of NCL cruises so far this year. Both were mostly full of Americans. On there own they are lovely but please don't let them gather together into a crowd. I can't stand that awful whooping that they do and when the Cruise Director comes out and says, "Make some noise!" Followed by, "Is everybody having a good time? Then, "I can't hear you! Is everybody having a good time?" Don't. Just don't.

Best to walk all three. Just to be sure.

If you win the toss then bat first. Surely?

That just goes to show how unreliable these 'statistics' are. The methodology used is worse than questionable and we have never established spread and variance in the published figures. Without that the results have no meaning and are just random numbers and in any list of random numbers one name will be at the bottom and another at the top. Far better to use your own eyes and experience and even then there will be a wide spread of opinions. My views are well known. He is 'OK' at best which might be enough for us this season but I would prefer someone better. I would also prefer someone with more of a dominating physical presence. I wasn't too impressed by Ramsdale last season to be honest and I think he got bullied off the ball on more than one occasion.