Quite so. We can speculate all we like but we shall never know what difference putting out a full first team would have made. It could be that our league position would have been worse.
I've just been along the beach at Hamble for my constitutional walk. I was struggling along the gravel into the teeth of a gale when some runner came jogging past me.
Yes, this is from a Canadian website and there are many differences between North American and British English usage. They say 'different than' for example.
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/words/who-or-whom
Quite straightforward really. I don't agree with their use of who/whom. Modern English has superseded their archaic interpretation. I would use 'who' for subject and direct object (accusative) and 'whom' for indirect objects (dative).
Edit: I had a suspicion that they were using the North American interpretation and I've just noticed that it's a Canadian website.