hypochondriac

Take it up with angelman not me.

My post was just a copy and paste of what angelman wrote. Was the car roadworthy when you sold it? Yes or no?

To add to the above.... as the car wasn't sold without a SORN then it must be considered to be roadworthy, whether you said it was for spares or not. As it had no SORN then it has to be roadworthy. That it has 6 months MOT left is irrelevant - MOT does not give carte blanche to drive a car in an unroadworthy condition. It is merely a statement that the car passed on the day of the test and it is up to the owner to keep the car in a roadworthy condition. You are stuffed and potentially a criminal.

He says himself he sold it without a SORN which means that legally it must be roadworthy. It wasn't so he has broken the law.

So is the spelling.

How is it? You broke the law you little sh*t.

WIsh I knew who this guy was. I would be very tempted to get him some free legal advice to ensure that justice was done.

OK lets stick to what we know. You committed fraud When this is pointed out to you you stand by your crime and refuse to consider any sort of compensation to the victim of your crime So are you saying that you wouldn't do this again should the opportunity present itself? Removing the assumptions, what you have done is horrible, meanspirited and illegal. Again, you make me sick.

It wasn't learnt though, you ripped off the bloke, committed fraud and don't have the decency to offer a refund when this is pointed out to you. You have no moral fibre and would probably do it again to some other poor soul given the chance. People like you make me sick.

Go on giffgaff. Best move I ever made.

As angelman pointed out, with no SORN at the time of sale the car must be roadworthy. It wasn't so you broke the law.

He wanted people to support his side of things when he has actually broken the law. Taking the money since breaking the law and displaying no empathy towards the person they have blatently ripped off is pikey behaviour.

No it isn't! What angelman posted is the LAW! This sin't a matter of opinion.

You just admitted that you caused fraud and broke the law (it was just pointed out to you.) What you feel is irrelevant, you broke the law plain and simple and the fact that you won't do anything about it because you think he doesn't have the mental capacity to call you up on it is despicable to be honest. You don't 'feel' you've done anything wrong. Pathetic.

Previous occupants are easily found.

Right so you broke the law (as shown here) and then think it's OK because you totally ripped off someone with a lower IQ than yourself. Just because you may get away with something doesn't make it morally right or mean that you have broken the law any less. You have just admitted that you aren't bothered that you just committed fraud because you don't think the victim affected has the IQ to get his money back that he is rightfully entitled to. You are worse than I thought.

Good man. Jonny response?

Hopefully the judge would find against you. Whether you have broken the law is up for debate. If you are talking about the spirit of the law and about being a fellow human being and citizen of the world, you are a cockle and deserve everything that comes to you.

Definitive proof that jonny is wrong and also that he is a thieving dirty pikey. The vehicle didn't match the description given, whether he knew that or not is irrelevant. I hope the buyer finds him an teaches him a thing or two about justice.

Ohh jonny is a pikey He rips off blokes all day And if the convict finds him They're gonna make him pay.

That maybe so (though I would be surprised if you didn't have an inkling) but as I said, you display no empathy for the buyer and have generally acted like a t*sser. You asked for advice and mine is that if you don't want to be thought of as a meanspirited Kn*b in life then you should at least offer a partial refund. The fact that you won't speaks volumes.

The amount of money paid isn't really the point. The bloke thought he was getting something from an advert that misrepresented what he was actually getting. I really feel sorry for the bloke, he has been conned by this little sh*t but karma is a b*tch so he will get what is coming to him most likely.

Unbelievable Jonny you are a creep. OK so technically you will probably get away with it but that doesn't change the fact that you have really ripped a bloke off and then because he was stupid you think that's OK. Anyone with any empathy would offer at least a partial refund and it's sellers like you that give ebay a bad name. I hope you buy something in a similar situation one day and the seller tells you to do one. You certainly deserve to be ripped off yourself.

Not having teenage children doesn't mean I have no experience of these people. I have an auntie who works for no limits so i have plenty of experience. What I'm saying is there is little point in just labelling them as pond-life or c*nts because of one admittedly very stupid and offensive action. Says this person realises what he did when older, regrets it an then lives a decent life contributing to society, is he still pond life? I don't think that all the youth in this country are a lost cause. Maybe the fact that you don't live here an just see events like this in the paper in isolation leaves you with an inaccurate view of things.

What is wrong with both? A punishment to stop the short term type of this behaviour and an educational aspect to change the behaviour in the long term.