hypochondriac

I have that in a picture frame!

Certainly not. Surely even you can see the difference between a scrounger who chooses not to work and gets propped up by the state, and a fellow human asking a favour from a fellow saints fan which would otherwise set him back a considerable amount of time and expense.

Well done to the likes of JustMike who offered to help out for free. I would do the same if I had skills in that area. Thanks for proving that community spirit is not dead.

Typical labour attitude.

Wonder how Richardson did?

Honourable man. Maybe he will be back at saints one day. Maybe.

I'll have them mate if they are going free. Where do I get them from?

Lol at people taking anything deppo says seriously. Honestly some posters on here are right mongs.

Well it does seem slightly odd to 'come out' on a forum when no one even knows your real name or identity (You're 'Mr X' for god sake).

Ess was ghey to me once so I can confirm the dormant sausage munching tendencies he tries to ignore.

According to the documentary maker, tourism actually falls during olympics. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8343784.stm

Was speaking to a guy who runs a documentary company. Currently doing one on the olympics and has been since 2006. He is livid about it, 100 year old parts of history in london just done away with. Houses bought up by compulsory purchase orders and people given much worse alternatives. All this PR about an olympic park when 90 percent of it is buildings with tiny bits of green in between. The IOC only pay for the ceremony and the rest of us pay for everything else. The IOC are made up of a very small group of people who make massive profits on every olympics and they are ambassadors so they don't even pay tax. And all this for a 2 week sporting event! It was very enlightening.

This thread will not end well.

I heard that al faraj was chanrai. Allegedly...

How do you know? I think we should have brought a striker and winger in earlier. Agreed?

Yes but my point is I think the money could have been better spent elsewhere.

That was really the point I was trying to make. Thanks for clarifying.

What would you have preferred? 200K on Dickson or on a winger or striker?

I just would have preferred to have seen Mills given a chance as one of our home grown players and maybe spent the money from Dickson on a fast striker or winger.

I still think it's a bit of an odd signing though seeing as we had Mills who is more than capable to fill in when required.

Really? Seems like Adkins prefers Harding at the moment and I'm inclined to agree.

Hmm. I can't agree with your opinion of Harding. One of my first names on the team sheet most weeks along with Fonte and Lallana.

Which is why I find it odd that Dickson would come here, especially when there was interest from CCC teams. I would much rather have gone somewhere to get regular playing time. Maybe that is just me though and I don't care so much about money.

Really been a bit of a disappointment since coming here and hasn't really made the impact I'm sure he hoped he would have done. Isn't better than Harding at left back and isn't really a left midfielder so I can't see him playing regularly this year. I bet the lad is so frustrated because I'm sure I remember when he signed him saying something that he came here to play regularly. I thought at the time he was a very odd signing considering we have Harding but the Brentford fans were adamant that he was better. I hope he comes good.

We have to start Guly after last week. Team should be: Davis Butterfield Fonte Seaborne Harding Puncheon Hammond Chaplow Lallana Guly Lambert Bench of: Bart, Schneiderlin, Dickson, Jaidi, Barnard, new striker guy, Martin (cracking bench now by the way.)