hypochondriac

Come on people don't be ridiculous. Everyone knows we need a DM, not sure why we would be looking at an attacking midfielder (certainly not barkley let's not be mental) or a striker unless we sack off long and send Gallagher on loan. DM and cb please.

It's our midfield where we have lost so much quality. Do we have any players in our team right now better than the likes of mane, Wanyama, Schneiderlin, Lallana? The answer is pretty much no. Our midfield has regressed significantly and we really need at least one real quality player to play alongside romeu. I'm very surprised we haven't brought that player in already. No idea why we bought this new cb.

I still think we will sell him, it will really damage us if we sell to Liverpool though.

So a load of hard left, angry disenfranchised youngsters who think the world owes them a living. What could go wrong?

I expected him to go this summer, I just don't think anyone will be happy if he goes to Liverpool.

No he doesn't, not by a long shot. It's those behind him that keep him there who are the real powerbrokers. Look at Kim's dad and how he sidelined his own father whilst he was still alive to see that.

Regardless of what anyone thinks of GM on here, he is entirely correct on this one.

I wasn't referring to kim personally. North Korean media called Obama a monkey.

Probably garner more interest if you post the picture up on here.

It's the bizarrest of bizarre outlooks to hate America and the west to the extent that you try to equate their actions to the monstrous regime in north Korea. America has their problems no doubt about it but it's not on the same planet as North Korea. Here is just one of many examples (read some books and see for yourself.) Edit: I was referring to aintforever here.

And the threats of raining down fire on the US and South Korea as well as the racist insults against the likes of Obama?

And the computer attacks, kidnappings, incarcerations, torture, murder of their own people, smuggling, fraud etc etc. It's a whole lot more than simply arming themselves and it's naive in the extreme to imagine that's all they are doing.

In what way is it defending itself?

That's true but it can also be a useful indicator about how we are going to play. Positive signs that the manager changed things around in the second half and seemingly it worked.

No one brought up Hillsborough except Liverpool fans. Again.

There's a reason they call it the self pity city and it's got nothing to do with Hillsborough. Look at the way they acted with Suarez for example- always someone else's fault and always playing the woe is me card.

Superb! Best not show them crab lungs' rant from the other day then...

Hilarious if he goes the amount t of people who will be disappointed. It's no different to every other time this has happened. I expected him to leave months ago so I'm not in the least bit bothered and interested to see how we spend the cash.

Have a lot of scouse mates. Coutinho is their best player by a fair distance- it's laughable to call him a squad player.

This is why you are referred to as an apologist for extremist islam. The US air force has people of all faiths in it including Muslims and people of no faith at all. It is clearly not a Christian organisation even if it has a number of Christians in it. Trying to pretend it is a Christian organisation in some bizarre attempt to claim US atrocities as Christians and thus to downplay or motigate the many atrocities committed by actual Islamic extremist organisations is just strange.

My struggle is how can non Muslims so confidently assert that the IS interpretation is a perversion of Islam given the violent actions of Muhammed who is referred to as "the perfect example" in the Qaran and given that we have entire countries that are supposedly devout Muslim countries that persecute homosexuals and have never heard of women's rights. Are they all perverting Islam? Seems to me that historically Islam very much has its roots in violence and subjugation and virtually every Middle Eastern Muslim country has at least some elements of barbarism that would be rejected by the West. Yet politicians still flatly deny that this has anything at all to do with Islam and its that falsehood that I think riles people most of all.

I'll reply to the rest of that later but let me assure you that as someone who was once in an amateur production of Ruddigore, I am well acquainted with the word Poltroon.

If we get in a decent DM and AM or RM depending on how we want to play then I'll be happy as long as we replace anyone who leaves.

I'd be interested to know what arguments or passages you found unreasonable but as you said, you've made your mind up already based on a twitter account so no need. I think if you were to read the book, you'd be surprise at some of the content. Pleas for no incitement to violence against Muslims under any circumstances and shunning physical conflict in favour of winning a battle of ideas because a conflict is giving the extremists what they want for example, ideas that I would not have expected from someone as disgusting and biased as you claim. I suppose the main difference is that I'm quite prepared to have a civil conversation regarding Islam and I'm happy to listen to opposing viewpoints. The trouble is, the usual response is to deflect onto other religions, discuss personalities rather than arguments that have been put forward and if that fails start calling people made up names like islamaphobic. As I said, happy to consider other points of view that differ from my own if you hold such views. Tadpole. (see I can write a meaningless word at the end of a post too.)

Have you read the book? Probably better to judge for yourself before flinging round words like disgusting based on a twitter feed.