hypochondriac

Knife wielding men taking hostages in France. Ho hum.

Bit late now. Much of this us down to Merkel and her white guilt opening the floodgates to anyone who fancied a trip to Germany.

Fair enough. It's the sort of routine thing that you see in western Europe from people with mental health issues all the time.

Good luck son! You caught me once when I foolishly posted late at night whilst also posting on here. You haven't managed it since...

It's more of a dangerous liaison that way.

Well either klopp or Henderson:

I'm pleased we've gone for bfs. He has a defined style, is good at getting the best out of players, is desperate for the job and has a back to basics approach that we need right now. He is a good pick imo

So actually complete and utter made up tosh. I was never upset about those claims and you were unable to substantiate what you said. Apology accepted. As ohio said, it's really not worth getting all upset about.

Kindly show where I was "upset" about Uniteds pr team writing something for Shaw to sign? Its a load of other people getting their knickers in a twist that anyone would even suggest something so heinous.

Indeed. Totally bizarre thing to get upset about.

Wow what an overreaction from some on here when someone dares to suggest that this was probably not written by Shaw but by Uniteds pr company even if he may have shared the sentiment.

Hmm. The cynic in me assumes this was some sort of pr thing because it's typed up on headed paper and he has just signed it at the bottom (he never struck me as the most erudite individual.) hopefully not.

OK well I disagree. I certainly disagree that any of those other players mentioned sums up that period better than keegan. It's the biggest transfer in our history.

I don't think it's precious to point out when you are being rude, particularly because I was perfectly civil to you. Par for the course from some on here though. I don't think our period of success in the late 70s to 80s was that short. Certainly longer than the 60 days you were claiming. It is my opinion as I previously stated that the players on the banner are not there as "legends" though most of them could be considered that. They are there to show the history of sfc and keegan sums up that as much as anyone else from the 80s.

Well no need to be rude about what was a perfectly civil conversation up until that point. My point which you have missed is that that era when we performed above ourselves and had a lot of success spanned a much greater time span that 60 games but that period was summed up by the signing of keegan and thus he is an appropriate figure for the banned despite not playing many games.

He represents the time when we had success and gave the big boys a bloody nose and shocked a lot of people. I think he represents that we'll as probably the biggest signing we have ever made.

Every time this comes up it shows that people misunderstand what each player represents. They are era defining players. Yes Fonte has had more of an impact than keegan but keegan definitely represents that era and should stay for that reason

Yep. If he mugged us off and left this summer I doubt everyone would be so keen!

This basically. They generally come back to bite you on the bum. Looks like a decent signing on the face of it though.

Both of those choices are rubbish. I'd prefer Liam Fox or Crabb

I disagree. It's not that we have overestimated how good they have been, it's that they have not performed as well when outside of our setup.

I think the statement that mane is replaceable will come back to bite some people on the bum. He's one of the best attacking players we have ever had and will be sorely missed.

What do we say when he is rubbish? Claude poo hell?

Have you read the reaction on social media, from many remain commentators in the media etc

No one was smugly gloating. Lots of people are saying it's the end of the world though, maybe you should be saving your advice about waiting for them.