NickG

totally agree. The way to get him out is to buy him out, anything else damages the club even more and does nothing to undermine him.

1/3 voting on this, probably more militant supporters forum don't back boycott. Its not going to work, will embarress decent fans and gain nothing but bad publicity for our club.

how did he lose his power last time? He totally ignored protests

also think some thought needs to be given to exactly what any protest is seeking to achieve, just remove Lowe -then what?

"Come on you reds"?

personally not convinced will work, so I will be going -although understand anyone choosing not to

failed is not the same as unproven. Some of those may still go down as good signings, others poor.

we have often, the previous seasons, played two up front -but with one playing much behind other -what we are calling one up front this year. More about players not being good enough /playing well enough than formation imho.

not saying we shouldn't change, just interesting thing on radio 5 other day a statition disproved all football myths about good time to score and changing manager gives instant boost -apparently it just as often makes no difference or things get worse. anyway back to saints - it gets to the stage that things do get in a rut and you need a catalyst to change -not sure if thats now just yet. His post match reactions worry me more and more. Would worry again, as did when calls for GB to go were made, who would we get? Anyone but GB proved disatrous -lets not do it again. Don't know enough about Hockaday's or Wotte's characters or desires to know whether they would be good bet.

would be interested to see Euell playing behind BWP. Euell with bit of presence to get knock downs etc and BWP with more pace and looking more likely in one on ones

someone buy shares and vote him out? Don't mean to sound glib but think thats the only way he will go and its that black and white

I am, by the last god knows how many years of management and boardroom changes. think most fans are, aren't we?

rests with someone with money and clout. He sat firm to the bitter end last time, didn't care about chants etc -only went when had no choice due to someone buying shares. I believe this is the only way it will change this time and why protests are counter productive. As they will not make the club any more attractive or successful - possibly the opposite.

eventually found the positive in this! Lowe / Crouch / LMc / Wilde / SISA etc are not news worthy and therefore will cause us less embaressment!

his head would be too big for anyone's body!

was just thinking about he maybe the reason - no idea his ability (Pulis) but one thing Wotton has is experience.

finishes with defiant "I am not resigning"

http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/saints/news/4000947.See_today_s_Daily_Echo_for_a_blow_by_blow_account_of_Saints__AGM/

nor me! (can't remember it but who knows!)

it was really good being a laughing stock with Lowe's comments and Arry etc. All it will achieve is embaress saints fans

http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/news/?page_id=11130

Happy Christmas and Best Wishes to all Saints fans. As my wife said once when I came home in a grump from a defeat "Why don't you just support someone better then?" But guess for us another similar year ahead!

who do you think would take over if he walked? Wilde?

wouldn't it be great for them all to go, not aiming high but someone with just enough money to 1) stabilise the club 2) appoint a new top chief exec/chairman perhaps with experience of another club then disappear into the background. Having said that thought Wilde was bringing most of that!

I don't know at all now, but when we were premiership and loaned out young/reserve players we didn't receive a fee and paid most (all in some cases I believe) of the wages. As the tables have now turned my guess is that likes of Cork and Pekhart cost very little, if anything. Rasiak /John etc bit different and would expect us to receive a fee and their wages paid.