egg

Quick question. Do you want to know so that you can give him a round of applause for each sacking of a duff employee? I think he needs 3.

It throws up different answers all the time. Bizarre piece of kit. It'll probably tell me tomorrow that I'm the most obsessed cos I've asked who's obsessed despite having zero interest in the bloke.

The top 5 it gave me focused on "engagement" rather than context around "obsessed".

Hmm...

It threw up only 1 name when I linked the lounge domain and asked who the most obsessed was, and that name was number 1 when I asked for a top 5....

It didn't like that, so I asked which poster seemed most obsessed. The answer wasn't SoG.

AI knows SoG.

Apologies, I misread your post.

.

I still think incomings are conditional on outgoings. If Edozie doesn't go, then Fellows doesn't come, for example.

Although he wouldn't be back at West Brom, and available for selection, if it was. Something doesn't add up.

Based on what? Our first time squad has 29 players, with the wages to go with it. I can't see that becoming 32.

Yep, but it's a timing issue. If our targets have other options, but we can't complete until we shift players, then those targets potentially move elsewhere. The agents for Edozie, Aribo, etc will know that, ditto their potential clubs, thus the squeeze is on us re those wages and fees. Lots of possibilities over the next few days, but unwanted players and the clubs who want them have a fair bit of power in these situations.

Yep. He's not the Bazunu of CB's, but he's average, and not an essential this season imo. I'm not desperate to see him go, but id cash in for a decent offer. That would have to be a profit over what we paid though, not what we paid for him.

He's not referring to the ability to multi task and negotiate more than 1 incoming deal at a time. The point is that we need to actually shift players out before we can complete the incoming deals. That depends on clubs wanting our players and them wanting the move.

Yep. We'll be getting squeezed by buyers who know we need to ship players out, and by the players too. I share your caution that we may not get all the names we hope for because of the difficulty in shifting players out. Let's see what unfolds.

8 grand is a proper bargain 😉

There's absolutely no well wish to the club or the fans, just a bit me, me, me. Respectful, yes, but not the best message to put out imo. Anyways, he's gone, we get cash to build, so no drama.

Yep. Good luck to him, he'll need it - relegation beckons. I wonder which training ground he'll visit next summer?!

Hmm. Doesn't wish the club or the fans all the best, etc. Just about his growth. Doesn't suggest a happy parting to me.

Che Adams wore number 14 👀

If we're playing a back 4, and get a decent DM *, I'd be comfortable with losing THB for strong money. If we carry on playing a 3/5, we need him otherwise it's Bree and Taylor as back up CB's. * As good as the German lad sounds, he's played mostly as a CM rather than a DM, so I hope that he is what we're missing.

For he's a jolly good Fellows.

Yep. I don't like all these "advanced talks", "agreed in principle" reports. It ain't over til the man signs on the line. I do wonder if the deals are contingent on shifting more players through the exit.

Mate, you can't in all seriousness say that he hasn't scored 17+ championship goals in 11 years as a criticism, but overlook that he scored that amount in the PL 5 years ago. The facts - and you like a fact - make your point a bit shit. I'm not advocating getting Bamford btw, he's a busted flush.