egg

Of course its relevant. A baby has no idea of the concept of God, thus their is neither belief nor disbelief. Let's move this along. At what point do you say that babies start to develop faith in something other than themselves?

I think we agree that babies are born neither believing nor disbelieving in anything. You can slap whatever title you want om that, the principle is agreed.

Simple yes or know Matty - do you agree that a child is born with neither a belief nor disbelief in God or religion? The title slapped on it is irrelevant.

On your latter point. Proving the existence of a god will never happen as one can never scientifically prove the existence of faith, and by extension, who or what - if anything) they put their faith in. The truth though is that we all live by faith of sorts, the difference is the extent to which we acknowledge or accept that.

You're intelligent enough to appreciate that there is argument galore about the definition of atheism but, semantics aside, it must be accepted that a person is born with neither a belief nor disbelief in God or religion (the latter not being a requirement to believe in the former).

Glad it's not just me. We're born completely devoid of opinion on race, religion, faith, etc. Everything thereafter is learned, discovered, or imposed.

Yep. They looked a good outfit. Very organised and players who punched well above their reputations. Grillitsch stood out as a very good player.

An atheist disbelieves. We're born neutral, ie with neither a belief in a god or religion, nor a disbelief. To suggest that we're born atheist is as nonsensical as suggesting that we're born with belief.

Weight

I enjoyed that, decent game. Austria unlucky.

My thoughts. I'm not his biggest fan, but he's worth more than that.

No. The MLG and Turkish thing is actually amusing. Your little feud with LD is just irritating.

Fruit

Club

When he became a coach he was a kind of link man between dressing room and management, but not sure about the loan monitoring part, or his current role.

I don't either. I'm a fan of loaning players out to get games at a competitive level. A season at Crewe rather than baby-sitting 17 year old in our under 23's will do him the world of good.

There's logic in that Sue, but the club have as good as said that the policy is to develop them here, and that loans are for players on the way out.

Interesting if true. His contract is running down and he needs to play regularly. Stranger things have happened...and perhaps Lloyd Kelly appeals to us with some kind of deal.

Yep, good change. Has to lead to more open games.

It's not that I don't like, I don't see the point. Nobody knows. He might be injured. He might not. As an England fan, I hope he's not.

Daft question. What makes you think anyone on here would know. We could all speculate, and we get it that you think it's cos he's injured.

Logic says he won't play Sancho which is why I think he might. Dropping Grealish and Saka would make no sense, so that's a distinct possibility too.

Yep, he'll start Sterling for sure. I'd have Grealish 10 and Saka right who deserves it after the other night. Wouldn't surprise me though if Southgate drops him and throws Sancho in.

It's 2021. I couldn't give a monkeys what happened nearly 50 years ago.