-
Posts
16,959 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by egg
-
You've told us elsewhere that on here you use a persona (grown adults don't do that by the way) . Flowing from that, explain what this means if I've misinterpreted your words Plus even if it was, being superficial on one forum for random Saints chat doesn't mean you are when in another role I'd put my shovel away if I were you mate.
-
Matthew, I really can't be arsed with another round of your doggedness. This started over us having a different opinion on whether JWP would offer more for England than Rice or Phillips. I said "we'll agree to differ" and on it goes, via a tangent or two. I judge players on what I see on the pitch. You judge them on what you see in a spreadsheet. I believe I understand the game. I believe you don't. I'm agreeing to differ. Have a good evening.
-
It's the honesty you don't like. You've boasted that you've been asked to scout football clubs. I've said that I find that hard to believe because your posts over the years suggest to me that you next to fuck all about football. If you feel the need to boast, don't bleat when you get some honest opinion back.
-
Seriously Matthew, arguing the merits of a footballer based on stats is ridiculous. They don't tell anyone how a player finds space, how he picks up the ball on the half turn, how he moves when he gets on the ball, whether he looks up before he gets the ball or has to think when he gets it, how quickly he releases the ball, whether he completes a pass by recycling it or by progressing play, etc etc. You won't get any of that on a spreadsheet. Turkish is right.
-
1. Don't be a plank. JWP is the inferior player. It's not about the manager. 2. The speed with which the ball is released, forward passing, runs into space, movement, aerial ability, strength, tackling are all areas where Phillips offers more. You can think otherwise, but to me there's a difference in quality in Phillips favour.
-
There's Saints tainted specs, but calling for Ings on the left wing is a bit much. Grealish, Sancho, Rashford for sure, but not Ings.
-
The tactics, personnel and subs were all wrong. Rice was deeper than needed. Philips was too distant from Rice, and making runs into dead ends that weren't being picked out. The full backs didn't get forward enough. Sterling was just shite. Foden and Mount were trying to get us going but had the useless Kane gave them no real options. Then the subs. Grealish on too late, but Foden off for him was nuts. Sterling off in a straight swap was obvious, or even braver, Phillips and giving Grealish a free ish role from the middle. Sancho would have given us pace and invention. Generally though, we were pedestrian, lacked creativity, and generally utter shite. Players poor. Southgate worse.
-
Highlight of the game was the Scottish fans. Amazing noise.
-
FFS!! I liked that TV!! Feckin' crazy decision. Sterling has been shite.
-
If he takes Mount or Foden off rather than Sterling, my TV is going out of the window.
-
This is dire. No creativity. No decent movement. Poor.
-
Now no longer interested in Gattuso. Options are reducing. I'm gonna put a few shekels on Martinez. Wouldn't rule out Nuno either.
-
The nature of the beast mate. We voted brexit to do trade deals with the rest of the world, and we ain't got the clout to insist on radical changes in the countries we deal with.
