egg

Simple questions based on a lack of knowledge don't aid discussion on a complex issue.

Bless. It really is too complex for you mate.

Err. You're involved. Or are you referring to the few people who liked MLG's tweet?

Good to know he's a detail man, and not someone looking to make a point at every opportunity. Or something.

Maybe it's them that finished him?

Your interpretation of the thread is your interpretation mate. I'm not getting drawn in beyond that.

I'm torn whether this thread is a contender for the worst in years, or brilliant because of MLG's pluckiness and inability to understand that he's being played like a piano.

You're a true hero Hypo 💙

Bless. You'd ignore my opinion if your crusade wasn't all about how you appear. As to the rest, the issue had gotten out of hand, sports governing bodies were at issue with each other, our law unclear, etc. Olympic rules were what they were, but your bigotry shone through on that issue. Clarity was needed, we now have it in the context of our law. Issue over for me.

Many do, but I've read your shite for years mate, and as I say, you don't convince me that your interest in this issue is centred around female safety. Being the fair minded man you claim to be, you'll respect my right to that opinion I'm sure.

Yep. The faux concern doesn't convince me either.

Involved is not impacted directly. You've been disproportionately frothing at the mouth over this since day 1. I'm not buying this uber nice guy front.

How women and girls are impacted by this is very different to how we as men are impacted by it. You've had a bee in your bonnet about this issue that goes way beyond a sense of security for them.

Dummy

The same applies to my wife, daughter and granddaughter. The clarity makes a difference to them. It'd be wrong to say that it impacts me though.

She'll have to use the ladies - there is no point having this change if 5 minutes later people are encouraging ignoring it and having inconsistency.

If you read my comment, you'd have seen that I recognise the need for the clarification. The decision makes huge differences for women, we all know that. What I don't get is the level of excitement by some on the issue, and I can't be doing with care/concern being used as a cover for bigotry. We've now got clarity of the obvious. Issue resolved for me.

An honest and sensible answer. Thanks. Who are you trying to kid. You'd have slaughtered SoG for answering like that.

Is transprickly a thing? Good word though.

Why are adult males so excited by this? We've got clarity, which was needed in law, but it not sure why people are rejoicing about something which makes no difference whatsoever to them.

Yesterday I bought a bagel for $3. Now I have a $3 trade deficit with the bagel shop! So I'm imposing a 145% reciprocal trade tariff on them. Today my bagel cost me $7.35. Art of the Deal!

No state of the art men's workout space?

The Dollar is devalued, all part of the plan imo. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cn4jjw30d5qt?post=asset%3Aac49dbd6-6fe7-4f54-ab75-e309358df63d#post

I'm assuming GM is on a wind up. That's the only credible explanation.

The market can't trust his volatility and unpredictability. Deals may help, but the US/Canada/Mexico had one of those and the market will know that they count for nothing. The markets will be on eggshells and further decline seems likely imo.