Lord Duckhunter

The ones with families have it topped up with benefits or the other half works full time, bringing in an equal amount. The single ones tend to be nippers or immigrants. The ones that voted and have discussed it,are pretty much all Leavers. Whelks parody is unfortunately wide of the mark as more than half of them are chicks. No titty pics I'm afraid.

I’m always weary of claiming why people voted, but I don’t think this is right. I think people didn’t believe Osborne’s predications or didn’t think it applied to them. If you’ve got nothing you’ve got nothing to lose. The people who work for me earn about 16K, I doubt they believe any Government would let them see their salary drop to £11,700. Of course the actual figure is based on slower growth in future years, but that got lost in all the project fear overkill. From my point of view, nothing’s more depressing than putting a price on independence or sovereignty. I felt the same about the SNP’s independence campaign. You either believe Scotland should be independent or you don’t, saying I do provided it doesn’t cost me money, is hardly Braveheart stuff. In actual fact there’s something quite heartening in people voting for principled, rather than monetary reasons. If Donald Trump agreed to pay every UK household 5k a year for 20 years provided The UK became a state of The US, I’m sure the Remoaners would turn that down, even though they’d be making themselves 100k poorer. Some things are more important than money. If you’re making independence & sovereignty decisions based on how it effects your finances, then ultimately everything has a price. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The time to start ****ing about and playing for second was during the Panama game when we were 3-0 up. Should have just taken that. I’ve no doubt Jose would have settled for a 3-0 then played out a boring 0-0 Thursday, job done. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

http:// Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

A normal country decides who can live in it. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Refereeing error then Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Exactly as I said. Poor refereeing is the issue, not VAR. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Less educated is quantifiable, less knowledgable about the issue isn’t. The reality is you’re showing extreme arrogance to assume that just because people didn’t agree with you, they had less knowledge of the subject. I’d imagine many many leave voters of my age will be in the same boat as me. Supportive of the EEC, until Maastricht when the nature of the beast changed. My educational level never changed, neither did my knowledge of the issue. What changed was the EEC, I didn’t suddenly become less educated, or less knowledgable of the issue. The other point you seem to be missing is the correlation between education and the vote. You seem to imply that people voted leave because they’re not as clever or educated. Have you ever thought that maybe the better educated had done better out of our relationship with The EU , than the lower educated. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Not going to happen, FIFA are adamant the final decision must be down to the on pitch referee. Rightly so imo. The issues yesterday wasn’t the VAR, the issue was poor refereeing. I was totally against any technology being involved, but seeing it in action has changed my mind. The problems are not down to VAR but pundits not understanding its remit, players still arguing and referees still making very poor decisions. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

My understand was it was ambiguous, with Liverpool claiming that the specific clause was that they had to “consider” any bid over £40mil. In other countries release clauses are actually buy out clauses. Technically the player buys out the remaining years of his contract, though clearly the money comes from the buying club. Don’t know what happens in England, but they do seem pretty rare. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I think some of you metro sexuals don’t get it. Women pundits- Played or managed zero games in men’s football, chick football is ****ing woeful, it’s not the same sport. They’ve done nothing to deserve being a pundit, if they didn’t have a vagina they wouldn’t be doing so. Women commentators- Don’t need any game experience, but their annoying whiny voices don’t suit football commentary. Women presenters- Just as good as men. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Having all these chicks on is just a tick box, they’re on because they’ve got a vagina, no other reason. None of them have played men’s football at any level and this is a men’s football competition. How would they feel if a bloke was a pundit on netball, they’d be kicking off about that. I’ve no problem with them hosting the show, but commentating and punditry, not for me. I would be insulted if I only got my job because I’ve got a co-ck. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Agreed Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Someone needs to shut that dopey bird on BBC highlights up. Her and that stuffed shirt Upson are hopeless Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Another good reason for stadium expansion, increase the odds. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

F**k verbal Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

You're all over the place chump. One post you're moaning about us fans bending over and taking it up the rectum, moaning about the club going backwards and next you're proposing we give a poorer player a chance. If replacing Ryan Bertrand with Targett isnt taking it up the rectum or a downgrade I don't know what is. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nope. It'll be a win win. More jobs for the very people the democrats claim to care about, and triggering lefties whilst doing so. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

When are these people paid to give their opinions going to learn the rules Upson " it's a pen and a red card", no it's ****inb not . The rules changed. It's bad enough having chicks giving their opinions, without blokes getting stuff wrong Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What on earth makes you think he's my idol. He's great at trolling lefties and it shines a massive light on their hypocrisy. The best thing about him is the people he upsets. God how they must praying that the economy screws up. They look at it from the wrong angle, instead of wondering how on earth he persuaded millions to vote for him, they should be wondering how awful the democrats are that a moron beat them. Instead of addressing that and looking in the mirror, they're just attacking him non stop, further playing to his narrative and fighting the battle on his ground. Keep it up and he'll get another term.

What would the democrats say if Trumps old man rigged the election with Sam Giancana's help, used and abused a famous film star, left some poor bird to drown in an upturned car, and used a cigar to penetrate a White House intern, before lying about it. Trumps a bloody choir boy compared to the liberal heroes of yesteryear Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It’s made the games better. Who wants yellow cards thrown around like confetti? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

American attitude towards illegal immigration has always been harsh, and racist long long before Donald Trump. Nobody could get elected without sounding tough on it. It was racist way back in the 80’s, and I should know having been an illegal in Florida for over 4 years. I’ve been on building sites when they turned up and rounded up the Mexican workers, never once checking the status of us white guys. The people we worked for, both contractors and the public, knew we were illegal but didn’t give a Shiite because we weren’t Mexican or Haitian. I was arrested for disorderly intoxication, charged, fined and never once had my immigration status checked. A Scouse taxi driver I knew served time for hitting his girlfriends lover with a tire wrench. Once he’d served his time he was sure he’d be deported, but no he was just released and INS never got involved. I only knew of one white bloke that got deported (his ex grassed him up), but I knew of hundreds of Mexican labourers in that time. It’s not racist because the president is, it’s racist regardless of who the president is. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

People writing him off before he’s even signed need to have a look at themselves. Perhaps I’m a bit old fashioned but I’ll wait to see him play for Saints. I also believe clubs our size have to sign some players with potential, there are 26 year olds in Scotland who are at the peak of their game. Obviously you wouldn’t want to sign one of them, but part and parcel of scouting is identifying the ones that can improve. Put the guy with better players, in a better league and he could blossom into it. Amateurs like us wont be able to tell, but a professional scouting set up, that’s monitored him for months, if not years, could do. Championship players don’t stay championship standard their whole career, some thrive at a higher level. Maybe he’s one, maybe he’s not, but £7mil is peanuts in the modern game. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

It’s no coincidence that the Fulham manager is also a Serb. He’s caused Rafa nothing but trouble, so personally I wouldn’t take the chance. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk