Lord Duckhunter

He’s been average from day one. He just had a decent defence in front of him. Even when he was keeping clean sheet after clean sheet, I don’t recall brilliant saves, the other sides just didn’t hit the target. How many times have you seen him make saves that you think “how did he save that”. A dozen maybe, and 10 of those were in two games (Liverpool & Arsenal) Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I only turned on at the end and he was doing my ****ing head in. After goal difference, goals scored, head to head, yellow cards is better than tossing a coin. Mind you, Lawro could do it as he’s a top tosser Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

What did you want them to do, attack and maybe get caught on the break or play normally and maybe pick up 2 bookings. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I’m still waiting for Gaston the last great one with “potential “ to come good. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Genius Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Danny Murphy, what a ****ing helmet. Doing my head in. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

He’s not in the same class, big fanny won’t be haunting anyone. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

****ing hell, I bet you’re a laugh down the ale house. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Put him on ignore. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Manchester City home. Mane got a hat trick but Tadic was sublime that day. Pass and touch like Bally that day, no higher compliment than that. Wonderful performance. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Exactly. Although it’s not my pocket, it’s the shareholders who benefit. I’m just an employee who manages other employees. I’ve posted many times that the 3 things that suppress the poorest wages are 1. Immigration 2. Working families tax credits 3. Minimum wage. Immigration speaks for itself, it increases supply. Tax credits just subsidise employers and the minimum wage has become a benchmark rather than a floor. There’s absolutely no incentive to increase wages, and the minimum wage suppresses wage competition. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The ones with families have it topped up with benefits or the other half works full time, bringing in an equal amount. The single ones tend to be nippers or immigrants. The ones that voted and have discussed it,are pretty much all Leavers. Whelks parody is unfortunately wide of the mark as more than half of them are chicks. No titty pics I'm afraid.

I’m always weary of claiming why people voted, but I don’t think this is right. I think people didn’t believe Osborne’s predications or didn’t think it applied to them. If you’ve got nothing you’ve got nothing to lose. The people who work for me earn about 16K, I doubt they believe any Government would let them see their salary drop to £11,700. Of course the actual figure is based on slower growth in future years, but that got lost in all the project fear overkill. From my point of view, nothing’s more depressing than putting a price on independence or sovereignty. I felt the same about the SNP’s independence campaign. You either believe Scotland should be independent or you don’t, saying I do provided it doesn’t cost me money, is hardly Braveheart stuff. In actual fact there’s something quite heartening in people voting for principled, rather than monetary reasons. If Donald Trump agreed to pay every UK household 5k a year for 20 years provided The UK became a state of The US, I’m sure the Remoaners would turn that down, even though they’d be making themselves 100k poorer. Some things are more important than money. If you’re making independence & sovereignty decisions based on how it effects your finances, then ultimately everything has a price. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The time to start ****ing about and playing for second was during the Panama game when we were 3-0 up. Should have just taken that. I’ve no doubt Jose would have settled for a 3-0 then played out a boring 0-0 Thursday, job done. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

http:// Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

A normal country decides who can live in it. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Refereeing error then Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Exactly as I said. Poor refereeing is the issue, not VAR. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Less educated is quantifiable, less knowledgable about the issue isn’t. The reality is you’re showing extreme arrogance to assume that just because people didn’t agree with you, they had less knowledge of the subject. I’d imagine many many leave voters of my age will be in the same boat as me. Supportive of the EEC, until Maastricht when the nature of the beast changed. My educational level never changed, neither did my knowledge of the issue. What changed was the EEC, I didn’t suddenly become less educated, or less knowledgable of the issue. The other point you seem to be missing is the correlation between education and the vote. You seem to imply that people voted leave because they’re not as clever or educated. Have you ever thought that maybe the better educated had done better out of our relationship with The EU , than the lower educated. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Not going to happen, FIFA are adamant the final decision must be down to the on pitch referee. Rightly so imo. The issues yesterday wasn’t the VAR, the issue was poor refereeing. I was totally against any technology being involved, but seeing it in action has changed my mind. The problems are not down to VAR but pundits not understanding its remit, players still arguing and referees still making very poor decisions. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

My understand was it was ambiguous, with Liverpool claiming that the specific clause was that they had to “consider” any bid over £40mil. In other countries release clauses are actually buy out clauses. Technically the player buys out the remaining years of his contract, though clearly the money comes from the buying club. Don’t know what happens in England, but they do seem pretty rare. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I think some of you metro sexuals don’t get it. Women pundits- Played or managed zero games in men’s football, chick football is ****ing woeful, it’s not the same sport. They’ve done nothing to deserve being a pundit, if they didn’t have a vagina they wouldn’t be doing so. Women commentators- Don’t need any game experience, but their annoying whiny voices don’t suit football commentary. Women presenters- Just as good as men. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Having all these chicks on is just a tick box, they’re on because they’ve got a vagina, no other reason. None of them have played men’s football at any level and this is a men’s football competition. How would they feel if a bloke was a pundit on netball, they’d be kicking off about that. I’ve no problem with them hosting the show, but commentating and punditry, not for me. I would be insulted if I only got my job because I’ve got a co-ck. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Agreed Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Someone needs to shut that dopey bird on BBC highlights up. Her and that stuffed shirt Upson are hopeless Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk