Lord Duckhunter

£200 every time you see the doc is as nutty as banning the unemployed from driving IMO. But that wasn't my point, as well you know. Does somebodies random opinion equate to party policy? If you think this ukip nutters driving policy equates and reflects ukip policy, then charging £200 for doc visit equates and reflects labour policy. Personally I think lord Winston wanting to charge £200 to see doc is not labour policy and is misguided, and I think the same, about this'd ukip clown, but I wasn't the one posting one blokes opinion and claiming it reflected policy.

Here's the thing . I go to a doctor when I think I'm ill , it is free for me to see him ( well free in I don't actually pay him there and then ) . If he decides I am I'll. , he writes me a prescription and I pop to the chemist and pay for it. If I'm not ill , I go away keeping my wedge in my wallet . The establishment seem happy with this , I pay when I'm ill and it's free if I'm not . Surely if an portion of it should be free it should be the remedy . But god forbide if anyone suggests paying the doctor . You can pay the chemist, but not the doc . Weird

What are your thoughts on lord Winstons idea that we should pay £200 to see the doctor . Lord Warner ex labour health minister agrees with the principle , but suggests £ 10 per month charge. What would you think if a ukip supporter proposed it?

the sports team thing is Green Party policy, the unemployed not driving thing is one blokes idea, not party policy. Do you understand that important difference ?

God, I feel sorry for Jack Dromey tonight, I bet Harperson's got him sleeping in the spare room. I thought wimmins lib was all about ban the bra, do what you want. Here's some news , no women are forced onto page 3 against their will, they all went freely and I do believe the photographer is a bird. Surely the people demeaning women, are the ones who seem to be saying that the silly little things only go on page 3 because men have put the idea in their silly little heads. The elephant in the room is Murdoch , because he owns The Sun , outrage is exaggerated. Wimmin lib types especially loony Lucas stand up for prozzies, overlook slut marches and other protests that involve tits being displayed, they don't seem to have a problem with the women's institute flashing their ancient norks . Its only when a popular right wing paper does it that there's an issue.

You are taking one blokes views and seem to be turning them into ukip policy. Lords Winston and Warner both advocate charging to see a doctor, can I claim that as labour party policy? "I really trust these guys" with " our NHS"

Lol top trolling by The Sun , and Nicole does seem to have a nice pair . I reckon she's got a great personality too. I really hope they had a change of heart after all the Wimmin and metrosexuals started gloating , looks like they boobed. Hope to see Harriet Harperson on Daily Politics tomorrow , either her or that loon Lucas.

It makes it ok if it's legal. Child porn is not legal , so not being bothered about page 3 does not equate to not being bothered about child porn. They are completely different things

Sam fox with her baps out can not be compared to child porn

It was the labour mayor of Doncaster that gave them the story, how's that a " hatchet job" . The guardian would run the story if it was given to them by a Tory mayor about Cameron

Je suis Linda Lusardi

Racist bastards

You sound like my snap dragon. She reckons our away days are a pub crawl with a match chucked in the middle of it.

Putting my pedantic head on, its a John Fogerty song , not status ****ing quo.

You've missed out that English sports teams will only be able to play other nations the government approves of. That's England banned from Fifa , because their rules prohibit any government interference.

You only have to watch the second Broadchurch to see what happens when a great one off series suddenly becomes a second one because of the viewing figures. Its complete and utter garbage , and the storyline so thin its got anorexia . I really hope the Missing writers will do a better job.

Born in the city, but only because dad was working there. No family ties , mum was a Londoner and dad a Bournemouth man ( unbelievable to think in the early 60' s , he moved rather than face a " long commute by car ") Dad used to go home to see Boscombe play, but gradually started to pop down the dell. His job took us too the west country when I was about 10, but by then I had the bug. All my kids are saints fans and they get their occasional bit of stick as we live in Poole. I've had a bit at work ( funny how 45 years of this can be called " glory hunting" ) , shut one bloke up by taking passport into work. Apart from the football I have no affiliation with the city, and it doesn't feel like my home town. Poole does, despite only moving here in my 30's. But once a teams in your blood, its in your blood and you're stuck with it.

I'd be careful because although qpr are a smallish club , they do have a few twts following them . They're not as friendly as Fulham , and my cousin who is a st holder there reckons things aren't too good at present . things are getting a bit tense amongst the support, and they might not take another defeat too well.

Can only be Rickie or Jose IMO. The way Jose has grown and grown into the leaders role , I can see him managing the club one day.

Ron was full of praise for him yesterday.

It's really not do able. Anyone who thinks today was a good result for us is deluded IMO.

What are people on? Today's result was a bad one for us, make no mistake about that. City & Chelsea will be top 2 , so we need them to beat all the rest around us. If their top striker gets injured they have Bony & Dzeko , we have Long & Gallaghar. They were poor today, but their squad is far far superior to ours.

Arsenal home ,man utd and Newcastle away this year , 9 points unbelievable. Add to that the fact our 3 best players are missing, and its quite an achievement.

****ing wound me up last night. Kept banging on about it while HR was on the pitch, disproving their point. I also know that clubs are more scientific than that, I don't believe he could get to the size he is now without the club having some sort of idea. One of my lads was at a pro club for a while when he was 9. He was quite small for a goal keeper. But even at that age, they measured him, weighed him, and all sorts. Told me he'd be 6ft by the time he left school and they were right. I seem to remember something about the size of his knees and feet was one clue, if my memory serves. Anyway, he wasnt good enough, and I doubt this lad was either. I doubt clubs realise players for being too small any more. Slightly off subject , but was the commentator related to Shane long , he had a serious man crush otherwise.

Spot on. It pulls up the ladder . Had FFP started when the premier league started chelsea and city would be ****ed. Now a RA or a rich Arab couldnt do the same to villa or Everton.