Jump to content

Lord Duckhunter

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    17,967
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Lord Duckhunter

  1. I slightly favour a win for West Ham. If Reading win, what a result that will be. That will give them confidence to come and win at our place, whereas a defeat will mean 2 out of 3 losess. I also think West Ham are a better side than them. If we win Sat it's pretty much done, but if we lose I'd rather be 5 ahead of Reading, than 6 ahead of West Ham.
  2. Andrew Neil said on This Week that he received a text from GG saying he had won. Him, Portillio and Alan Johnson were all of the opinion that it was bad for Millibandwagon. You can bet your last £ that the next PMQ's that Millibandwagon mentions "out of touch", this will be thrown back in his face. Our whole political system involves petty point scoring. Had Labour won this seat we would have had Millibandwagon, Balls and all banging on about the Budget, Fuel crisis and the 50% tax rate. I think it's funny that they are so out of touch they thought this was in the bag (although to be fair, so did the media)
  3. 10k,20k or 1 vote. Under FPTP it doesn't really matter. They were never going to win this seat and doubt if they ever will again. The political capital that can be made over Labour losing this seat is a lot greater than worrying about shipping votes where they were never going to win.
  4. As I said earlier, due to work I was watching this as result started to come in. The faces of the Labour people told the story, the Sky guy also said that the Tory and Lib/Dem people were throughly enjoying it. They would hardly be enjoying it, if it was such a bad night for them. It was a perfect end to a bad week for the Tory's.
  5. The problem is they are so deluded that you can't pick out which ones are Saints on a wind up.
  6. Yes, I got one in................
  7. Scott: TB hopefully will consider the long term prospects of PFC under any bid and choose the best one, not necessarily the highest one I thought that he had a legal requirement to get the most money for the creditors.
  8. But it's been a Labour stronghold since 1974 (apart from a brief spell when the sitting Labour MP joined the SDP). The Tories were never going to win this seat. Bad news for the voters of Bradford though, Millibandwagon has just announced he is going to visit them next week to find out why they voted the way they did.......
  9. I agree, it'll all kick off if this happens. Try to take the **** out of other professionals and you're liable to get kicked up in the air. Kelvin's got more class than to take it anyway.
  10. I just think the format is slightly wrong since they changed it to an investment. I cant help thinking that Sugar knows whose business idea he wants and wont fire people on the basis of the particular task.That bird fired the other night, shouldn't have gone, but I bet her investment idea was some sort of restaurant as that was all she went on about. Sugar thought, I dont want to invest in a restaurant, so sacked her. Last year was the same that Tom guy was hopeless, lost about 6 tasks running yet Sugar never fired him, turned out he had the best original idea (some curved nail file). It's a bit Dragons Denish for me. If Sugar doesn't want someone to work for him, then it should just be a cash prize or failing that Sgar shouldn't ask for their ideas until nearer the end, I just get the feeling his decisions are being based on stuff other than the tasks and I didn't get that feeleing under the previous format.
  11. I worked into the night last night and got home to turn on Sky News, the Labour faces at the count told their own story. They really thought they were going to win this one. If Ed Millibandwagon can't win Bradford what hope has he got, and he was supposed to have had a "good week". His party came second in a one horse race.He should forget who Cameron had for dinner and start worrying about who Balls and Cooper are inviting.
  12. Funny how the "Health and Safety" concerns arise now we have a Tory led coalition. A spokesman on Sky news this afternoon said the regulations were exactly the same under Labour. 2 questions for the lefties, Labour had 13 years to regulate and make things safer, why didn't they? And why was their no strike action on these "important" H&S concerns during their time in office. The union can't be playing politics as lefties are above that sort of thing, so it's all very strange...........
  13. Plus the bit about Dail mail readers, dont forget that important point.
  14. I hope these queues caused by the Daily Mail readers are going to form part of The Leveson Inquiry. I just hope to god Hugh Grant and Steve Coogan weren't stuck in a queue and late for appointments, otherwise the Beeb will be wheeling them out on newsnight tonight.
  15. LOL you couldn't make it up. Unions talk about a strike, Govt spokesmen make a bit of a hash over the message, all the papers report it, yet it's only Daily Mail readers who are causing the queues. Dont you just love lefties?
  16. Hardly the unions fault???? If the unions had no intention of striking we wouldn't need to think through a "strategy". We would just fill up when we needed fuel.
  17. I was listening to the press pass on talksport the other week and debt was being discussed. The general opinion was that rich foregin owners were a bad thing if they loaded debt onto the club, ala Man U, or wanted their money back in the end ala Gaydamak. They all seemed to think that putting money into the club for equity was fine and the only way to go. I'm a bit ignorant about these things, but is that what's happened here? Am I right in assuming that if things go tits up, we wont owe ML's family £33mil they will just lose that money?
  18. I see tomorrows Question Time is from Skatesville. Thank god Penny's not on it, otherwise we'd have a question about the poor local football fans. I still think one of the inbreds might bring it up............. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01f8ppv
  19. Since about Nov I've been thinking if we can be top going into April we'll go up. Would like to see Reading start to blip a bit and ease the pressure a touch, but we couldn't dream of a better situation.
  20. Isn't that the Andrew Davies who played for us, says he's been sent off 3 times this season now. I liked the way the bloke commentating said "the ref's lost complete control" like he's supposed to do something about it, it's hardly the refs fault. On Talksport the local media guy said the ref sent the 5 players off in the dressing room after. Crawley and their Manager have little class and like to wind people up.
  21. Want QPR to stay up as my Mum's family are from Ealing and all support them. One of my Fav away games. I wouldn't mind seeing Wolves drop ,after doing a Lowe and replacing MM with his right hand man. Would like Wigan to go as Dave Whelan is a ****. Keeps banging on about wage caps and clubs living within their means. Had they done so, they would still be in the 4th Division.He now wants to pull the ladder up and stop other teams doing the same. Blackburn, Steve Keen is a crap Manager. I feel sorry for their fans, they remind me of our Branfoot campaign. The press keep banging on about how Keen has proved them wrong. The fans get a bad press, but Keen is still crap whichever way you look at it.Would like to see them go down and prove the supporters right.
  22. I've never wanted my team to lose any game the past 40 years, and I'm not going to start now. Players aren't going to throw it, they dont have a hatred of rivals like supporters do. Any poor performance will be because the jobs done, and they've taken their eye off the ball, nothing else. Them sending us down was a myth anyway, we lost, had we won we would have stayed up. Dennis Law's back heel didn't send Utd down either, while we're on the subject.
  23. We already pay enough to our MP's and parties without spending anymore. As their expenses claims still show, we are paying eye watering amounts of money for things that every other working person has to pay for themselves.Why should the hard pressed tax payer be forced to shell out money because our political parties are incapable of regulating themselves and keep selling themselves to the highest bidder. These greedy bastards will find other ways of fethering their nests,even if the taxpayer funds them even more. There are rules in place, there are anti corruption laws and all donations should be published. If the parties acted in a correct manner and donations were just that, then the tax payer could keep their hand in their pockets. The arguement for state funding seems to be that unless they get it the parties will have to prostitute themselves and have policy influenced by large donors. The more they do that, the less they should be trusted with our money, but bizzarely the reverse seems to be true.To stop corruption lets give the corrupt people our money
  24. How do you explain the **** up he made at Wolves then?
  25. I cant see what the issue is, Kelvin deserves to be number 1 next season. It's strange it's even being discussed. Personally I think the number 2 keeper should be an older guy. It's a real tough job to train all week and then sit on the bench (provided Nigel picks a keeper) with little prospect of coming on, but having to be ready for the 1 in 100 chance that you do. If Nigel thinks Bart will replace Kelvin in the end, then he needs to go out on loan for a season, maybe to Boscombe or someone like that. You need a good solid pro as a back up, not a youngster with lots to prove. The odd Cup game is not enough when you're talking about the Premiership. I would be worried if Kelvin was out for the rest of this season and we're flying, I dread to think what Bart would be like at Old Trafford or Anfield.
×
×
  • Create New...